Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Do hummingbirds prefer store-bought food made from concentrate or a simple mixture of sugar and water? To find out, a researcher obtains 10identical hummingbird feeders and fills 5, chosen at random, with store-bought food from concentrate and the other 5 with a mixture of sugar and water. The feeders are then randomly assigned to 10possible hanging locations in the researcher’s yard. Which inference procedure should you use to test whether hummingbirds show a preference for store-bought food based on the amount consumed?

a. A one-sample z-test for a proportion

b. A two-sample z-test for a difference in proportions

c. A chi-square test for independence

d. A two-sample t-test

e. A paired t-test

Short Answer

Expert verified

The correct option is (d) A two-sample t-test

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A researcher obtains 10 identical hummingbird feeders and fills 5, chosen at random, with store-bought food from concentrate and the other 5 with a mixture of sugar and water.

02

Explanation

There are ten feeders in total: five with water/sugar and five with store-bought food. To avoid bias, everything is randomised. As a result, the data will look like this:

Feeder 1: Sugar/Water - for the amount consumed

Feeder 2: Store-bought - for the amount consumed

And so forth. There are two distinct populations. For proportion, you will not utilise the z-test because it requires a big sample size.

Because we only have one factor, the chi-square test for independence would be useless (sugar water or store-bought).

Because the observations are not paired in any way, a paired T-test is useless.

As a result, a two-sample t-test is the best option, but because this is a tiny sample, it's critical that the population is normally distributed, which may or may not be the case. As a result, option (d) is the proper choice.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Could mud wrestling be the cause of a rash contracted by University of Washington students? Two physicians at the university’s student health center wondered about this when one male and six female students complained of rashes after participating in a mud-wrestling event. Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of students who participated in the event. The results, by gender, are summarized in the following table.

Here is some computer output for the preceding table. The output includes the observed counts, the expected counts, and the chi-square statistic.

From the chi-square test performed in this study, we may conclude that

a. there is convincing evidence of an association between the gender of an individual participating in the event and the development of a rash.

b. mud wrestling causes a rash, especially for women.

c. there is absolutely no evidence of any relationship between the gender of an individual participating in the event and the subsequent development of a rash.

d. development of a rash is a real possibility if you participate in mud wrestling, especially if you do so regularly.

e. the gender of the individual participating in the event and the development of a rash are independent.

Multiple Choice Select the best answer for Exercises 23-28. Exercises 23-28 refer to the following setting. To see if students with longer feet tend to be taller, a random sample of 25students was selected from a large high school. For each student, x=footlength&y=heightwere recorded. We checked that the conditions for inference about the slope of the population regression line are met. Here is a portion of the computer output from a least-squares regression analysis using these data:

Which of the following would have resulted in a violation of the conditions for inference?

a. If the entire sample was selected from one classroom

b. If the sample size was 15instead of 25

c. If the scatterplot of x=footlength&y=heightdid not show a perfect linear relationship

d. If the histogram of heights had an outlier

e. If the standard deviation of foot length was different from the standard deviation of height

A Harris poll found that 54%of American adults don’t think that human beings developed from earlier species. The poll’s margin of error for 95%confidence was 3%. This means that

a. there is a 95%chance the interval (51%,57%) contains the true per cent of American adults who do not think that human beings developed from earlier species.

b. the poll used a method that provides an estimate within 3% of the truth about the population in 95%of samples.

c. if Harris conducts another poll using the same method, the results of the second poll will lie between 51%and 57%

d. there is a 3% chance that the interval is incorrect.

e. the poll used a method that would result in an interval that contains 54%in95% of all possible samples of the same size from this population.

If P(A)=0.2and P(B)=0.52 and events A and B are independent, what is P(A or B)?

a. 0.1248

b. 0.28

c. 0.6352

d. 0.76

e. The answer cannot be determined from the given information.

Nicole and Elena wanted to know if listening to music at a louder volume negatively impacts test performance. To investigate, they recruited 30volunteers and randomly assigned 10volunteers to listen to music at 30decibels, 10volunteers to listen to music at 60decibels, and 10volunteers to listen to music at 90decibels. While listening to the music, each student took a 10-question math test. Here is computer output from a least-squares regression analysis using role="math" localid="1654167255833" x=volumeand y=numbercorrect:

PredictorCoefSECoefTPConstant9.90000.752513.1560.0000Volume0.04830.01164.1630.0003S=1.55781R-Sq=38.2%R-Sq(adj)=36.0%

Is there convincing evidence that listening to music at a louder volume hurts test performance? Assume the conditions for inference are met.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free