Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

More Olympics Athletes who participate in the shot put, discus throw, and hammer throw tend to have different physical characteristics than other track and field athletes. The scatterplot shown here enhances the scatterplot from Exercise 5 by plotting these athletes with blue squares. How are the relationships between height and weight the same for the two groups of athletes? How are the relationships different?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Similarities:

For both groups, there is a linear and positive relationship between height and weight, with no outliers.

Differences:

For discus throwers, hammers throwers, and shot putters, the link between height and weight is weaker. Weights for discus throwers, hammers throwers, and shot putters should be higher than for other athletes.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

In Blue: Athletes from shot put, discus throw, hammers throw

In Black: Other track and field athletes

02

Explanation

Similarities:

Note that

Because the pattern slopes upwards for both groups of athletes in the scatterplot, this demonstrates a positive relationship between height and weight for both groups.

And

There is no substantial curvature in either group's points, and both groups' associations appear to be linear.

Also,

Neither group appears to have outliers because there are no significant deviations from the pattern in the other points.

Differences:

Note that

Because the squares appear to be spread out more than the dots in the scatterplot, there appears to be a weaker association between height and weight for athletes like the hammer throw, discus throw and shot put.

Also,

The weight of athletes in the hammer throw, discus throw, and shot put appears to be higher than the weight of other athletes in the scatterplot because most of the squares are above the dots.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Will I bomb the final? We expect that students who do well on the midterm exam in a course will usually also do well on the final exam. Gary Smith of Pomona College looked at the exam scores of all 346 students who took his statistics class over a 10-year period. 17 The least-squares line for predicting final-exam score from midterm-exam score was yโž=46.6+0.41x . Octavio scores 10 points above the class mean on the midterm. How many points above the class mean do you predict that he will score on the final? (This is an example of the phenomenon that gave โ€œregressionโ€ its name: students who do well on the midterm will on the average do less well, but still above average, on the final.)

More Starbucks In Exercises 6 and 12, you described the relationship between fat (on Page Number: 204 grams) and the number of calories in products sold at Starbucks. The scatterplot shows this relationship, along with two regression lines. The regression line for the food products (blue squares) is y^=170+11.8x. The regression line for the drink products

(black dots) is y^=88+24.5x

a. How do the regression lines compare?

b. How many more calories do you expect to find in a food item with 5 grams of fat compared to a drink item with 5 grams of fat?

The stock market Some people think that the behavior of the stock market in January predicts its behavior for the rest of the year. Take the explanatory variable x to be the percent change in a stock market index in January and the response variable y to be the change in the index for the entire year. We expect a positive correlation between x and y because the change during January contributes to the full yearโ€™s change. Calculation from data for an 18-year period gives x = X=1.75%sx=5.36%y=9.07%sy=15.35%r=0.596

(a) Find the equation of the least-squares line for predicting full-year change from January change. Show your work.

(b) The mean change in January is x=1.75%. Use your regression line to predict the change in the index in a year in which the index rises1.75% in January. Why could you have given this result (up to roundoff error) without doing the calculation?

Long strides The scatterplot shows the relationship between x = height of a student (in inches) and y = number of steps required to walk the length of a school hallway, along with the regression line y^=113.6โˆ’0.921x

a. Calculate and interpret the residual for Kiana, who is 67 inches tall and took 49 steps to walk the hallway.

b. Matthew is 10 inches taller than Samantha. About how many fewer steps do you expect Matthew to take compared to Samantha?

Husbands and wives The mean height of married American women in their

early 20s is 64.5 inches and the standard deviation is 2.5 inches. The mean height of married men the same age is 68.5 inches with standard deviation 2.7 inches. The correlation between the heights of husbands and wives is about r = 0.5.

a. Find the equation of the least-squares regression line for predicting a husbandโ€™s height from his wifeโ€™s height for married couples in their early 20s.

b. Suppose that the height of a randomly selected wife was 1 standard deviation below average. Predict the height of her husband without using the least-squares line.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free