Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A smash or a hit?Researchers asked 150 subjects to recall the details of a car accident they watched on video. Fifty subjects were randomly assigned to be asked, “About how fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?” For another 50 randomly assigned subjects, the words “smashed into” were replaced with “hit.” The remaining 50 subjects—the control group—were not asked to estimate speed. A week later, all subjects were asked if they saw any broken glass at the accident (there wasn’t any). The table shows each group’s response to the broken glass question.

(a) What proportion of subjects were given the control treatment?

(b) Find the distribution of responses about whether there was broken glass at the accident for the subjects in this study using relative frequencies.

(c) What percent of the subjects were given the “smashed into” treatment and said they saw broken glass at the accident?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part (a) 0.3333

Part (b) 19.33% said YES and 80.67% said NO.

Part (c) 10.67%

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1. Given information.

The given table is:

02

Part (a) Step 2. Determine the percentage of individuals who received the control treatment.

Total Subjects included in this study: 150

50 subjects were assigned to each performed treatment. Therefore in the control treatment, 50 subjects were included.

Its proportion is:

50150=0.3333

03

Part (b) Step 1. Determine the distribution of responses for the individuals concerning whether there was broken glass at the accident. 

First, we need to find the row total for each row,



“Smashed into”
“Hit”
Control
Row Total
Yes167629
No344344121

Yes: A total of 29 subjects responded "YES".

291500.1933or19.33%

No: A total of 121 subjects responded "NO".

1211500.8067or80.67%

From the above data, we can conclude that about 19.33% of respondents said "YES" and 80.67% said "NO" when they were asked whether they observed broken glasses.

04

Part (c) Step 1. Determine the percentage of individuals who were given "smashed into" treatment and reported shattered glass.

Total Subjects included in this study: 150

Respondents that said yes to “smashed into” treatment and also observed broken glass include: 16 subjects

Their percentage is:

161500.1067or10.67%

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Feeling sleepy? Refer to Exercise 45. Describe the shape of the distribution.

Die rolls Imagine rolling a fair, six-sided die 60 times. Draw a plausible graph of the distribution of die rolls. Should you use a bar graph or a histogram to display the data?

Watch that caffeine! The U.S. Food and Drug Adminis tration (USFDA) limits the amount of caffeine in a 12-ounce can of carbonated beverage to 72 milligrams. That translates to a maximum of 48 milligrams of caffeine per 8-ounce serving. Data on the caffeine content of popular soft drinks (in milligrams per 8-ounce serving) are displayed in the stemplot.

Part (a). Why did we split stems?

Part (b). Give an appropriate key for this graph.

Part (c). Describe the shape of the distribution. Are there any outliers?

Enhancing creativity Do external rewards—things like money, praise, fame, and grades —promote creativity? Researcher Teresa Amabile recruited 47 experienced creative writers who were college students and divided them at random into two groups. The students in one group were given a list of statements about external reasons (E) for writing, such as public recognition, making money, or pleasing their parents. Students in the other group were given a list of statements about internal reasons (I) for writing, such as expressing yourself and enjoying wordplay. Both groups were then instructed to write a poem about laughter. Each student’s poem was rated separately by 12 different poets using a creativity scale. 26 These ratings were averaged to obtain an overall creativity score for each poem. Parallel dotplots of the two groups’ creativity scores are shown here.

Part (a). Is the variability in creativity scores similar or different for the two groups? Justify your answer.

Part (b). Do the data suggest that external rewards promote creativity? Justify your answer.

Feeling sleepy? Students in a high school statistics class responded to a survey designed by their teacher. One of the survey questions was “How much sleep did you get last night?” Here are the data (in hours):

Part (a). Make a dotplot to display the data.

Part (b). Experts recommend that high school students sleep at least 9 hours per night. What proportion of students in this class got the recommended amount of sleep?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free