Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A nuclear power plant releases water into a nearby lake every afternoon at 4:51pm. Environmental researchers are concerned that fish are being driven away from the area around the plant. They believe that the temperature of the water discharged may be a factor. The scatterplot shows the temperature of the water (in degrees Celsius) released by the plant and the measured distance (in meters) from the outflow pipe of the plant to the nearest fish found in the water on eight randomly chosen afternoons.

Here are computer output from a least-squares regression analysis on these data and a residual plot:

a. Explain why a linear model is appropriate for describing the relationship between temperature and distance to the nearest fish.

b. Write the equation of the least-squares regression line. Define any variables you use. c. Interpret the slope of the regression line.

d. Compute the residual for the point(29,78). Interpret this residual.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part a. The dots in the residual plot appear to be randomly scattered about zero, which indicates that the linear model is appropriate.

Part b. y=-73.64+5.7188x

Part c. On average the distance to the nearest fish increases byb=5.7188mper°CPart d. The predicted distance is14.2052 meters higher than the actual distance, when the temperature is29°C.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1. Explanation

A linear model is appropriate for describing the relationship between temperature and distance to the nearest fish because the pattern in the scatterplot does not contain a lot of curvature and the pattern in the residual plot does not contain a lot of curvature either. Moreover, the dots in the residual plot appear to be randomly scattered about zero, which indicates that the linear model is appropriate.

02

Part (b) Step 1. Explanation

It is given that researchers want to study about is the temperature of the water discharged by the plants causes harm to the fishes of the water body or not. Thus, a scatterplot was been made on the temperature and distance to the nearest fish. Then, computer output from a least square regression analysis on these data and residual plot information is given in the question.

From that we know that, the coefficients for the regression line is listed under the heading "Coef" and the constant is the intercept. Also, temperature is the slope. Thus, now we can calculate the regression line as:

y=-73.64+5.7188x

Where x=Temperature of the water released.

03

Part (c) Step 1. Explanation

It is given that researchers want to study about is the temperature of the water discharged by the plants causes harm to the fishes of the water body or not. Thus, a scatterplot was been made on the temperature and distance to the nearest fish. Then, computer output from a least square regression analysis on these data and residual plot information is given in the question.

From part (b), we know that the regression line is as follows:

y=-73.64+5.7188x

The slope as we know, is coefficient of xin the least square regression equation and represents the average increase or decrease of yper unit of x.

Thus, we have b=5.7188

So, we can interpret that on average, the distance to the nearest fish increases byb=5.7188mper°C

04

Part (d) Step 1. Explanation

It is given that the point is (29,78), which implies that,

x=29andy=78

Now, we know from part (b), that the regression line is as follows:

y=-73.64+5.7188x

Let us now find out the predicted value, which can be calculated by evaluating the least square regression line at x=29. Thus, we have,

y^=-73.64+5.7188x=-73.64+5.7188(29)=92.2052

Now, as we know residual is the difference between the actual value and the predicted value. Thus it is calculated as:

Residual =y-y^

=78-92.2052=-14.2052

Thus, we conclude that, the predicted distance is14.2052 meters higher than the actual distance, when the temperature is29°C.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Children make choices Refer to Exercise 15.

a. Explain why the sample results give some evidence for the alternative hypothesis.

b. Calculate the standardized test statistic and P-value.

c. What conclusion would you make?

A researcher wished to compare the average amount of time spent in extracurricular activities by high school students in a suburban school district with that in a school district of a large city. The researcher obtained an SRS of 60high school students in a large suburban school district and found the mean time spent in extracurricular activities per week to be 6hours with a standard deviation of 3hours. The researcher also obtained an independent SRS of 40high school students in a large city school district and found the mean time spent in extracurricular activities per week to be 5hours with a standard deviation of 2hours. Suppose that the researcher decides to carry out a significance test of H0: μsuburban=μcity versus a two-sided alternativ

The P-value for the test is 0.048. A correct conclusion is to

a. fail to reject H0because0.048<α=0.05. There is convincing evidence of a difference in the average time spent on extracurricular activities by students in the suburban and city school districts.

b. fail to reject H0because 0.048<α=0.05. There is not convincing evidence of a difference in the average time spent on extracurricular activities by students in the suburban and city school districts.

c. fail to reject H0because0.048<α=0.05. There is convincing evidence that the average time spent on extracurricular activities by students in the suburban and city school districts is the same.

d. reject H0because 0.048<α=0.05. There is not convincing evidence of a difference in the average time spent on extracurricular activities by students in the suburban and city school districts.

e. reject H0because 0.048<α=0.05 . There is convincing evidence of a difference in the average time spent on extracurricular activities by students in the suburban and city school districts.

Two samples or paired data? In each of the following settings, decide whether you should use two-sample t procedures to perform inference about a difference in means or paired t procedures to perform inference about a mean difference. Explain your choice.

a. To compare the average weight gain of pigs fed two different diets, nine pairs of pigs were used. The pigs in each pair were littermates. A coin toss was used to decide which pig in each pair got Diet A and which got Diet B.

b. Separate random samples of male and female college professors are taken. We wish to compare the average salaries of male and female teachers.

c. To test the effects of a new fertilizer, 100 plots are treated with the new fertilizer, and 100 plots are treated with another fertilizer. A computer’s random number generator is used to determine which plots get which fertilizer.

An agricultural station is testing the yields for six different varieties of seed corn. The station has four large fields available, located in four distinctly different parts of the county. The agricultural researchers consider the climatic and soil conditions in the four parts of the county as being quite different, but are reasonably confident that the conditions within each field are fairly similar throughout. The researchers divide each field into six sections and then randomly assign one variety of corn seed to each section in that field. This procedure is done for each field. At the end of the growing season, the corn will be harvested, and the yield (measured in tons per acre) will be compared. Which one of the following statements about the design is correct?

a. This is an observational study because the researchers are watching the corn grow.

b. This a randomized block design with fields as blocks and seed types as treatments.

c. This is a randomized block design with seed types as blocks and fields as treatments.

d. This is a completely randomized design because the six seed types were randomly assigned to the four fields.

e. This is a completely randomized design with24treatments—6 seed types and 4 fields.

The correlation between the heights of fathers and the heights of their grownup sons, both measured in inches, isr=0.52. If fathers’ heights were measured in feet instead, the correlation between heights of fathers and heights of sons would be

a. much smaller than 0.52.

b. slightly smaller than 0.52.

c. unchanged; equal to 0.52.

d. slightly larger than 0.52.

e. much larger than 0.52.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free