Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Music and memory Does listening to music while studying help or hinder students’ learning? Two statistics students designed an experiment to find out. They selected a random sample of 30students from their medium-sized high school to participate. Each subject was given 10minutes to memorize two different lists of 20words, once while listening to music and once in silence. The order of the two word lists was determined at random; so was the order of the treatments. The difference (Silence − Music) in the number of words recalled was recorded for each subject. The mean difference was 1.57and the standard deviation of the differences was 2.70.

a. If the result of this study is statistically significant, can you conclude that the difference in the ability to memorize words was caused by whether students were performing the task in silence or with music playing? Why or why not?

b. Do the data provide convincing evidence at theα=0.01 significance level that the number of words recalled in silence or when listening to music differs, on average, for students at this school?

c. Based on your conclusion in part (a), which type of error—a Type I error or a Type II error—could you have made? Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. Yes we can conclude that the difference in the ability to memorize words was caused by whether students were performing the task in silence or with music playing.

b. Yes, there is convincing evidence at the α=0.01significance level that the number of words recalled in silence or when listening to music differs, on average, for students at this school.

c. We have made a Type I error.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a): Step 1: Given information

We have been given that we have a random sample of 30students and the mean difference was 1.57and the standard deviation of the differences was 2.70.

We need to find out whether the difference in the ability to memorize words was caused by whether students were performing the task in silence or with music playing.

02

Part (a): Step 2: Explanation

We note that the selected students are a random sample and the order of treatments was randomly assigned to the students and this implies that the result needs to be due to the treatments themselves, as the randomization ensures that the result cannot be due to other variables except the treatment.

03

Part (b): Step 1: Given information

We have been given that we have a random sample of 30students and the mean difference was 1.57and the standard deviation of the differences was 2.70.

We need to find out do the data provide convincing evidence at the α=0.01significance level that the number of words recalled in silence or when listening to music differs, on average, for students at this school.

04

Part (b): step 2: Explanation

Given:

n=Samplesize=30x¯d=Meandifferences=1.57sd=Standarddeviationofdifferences=2.70α=Significancelevel=0.01

Now we will carry out a hypothesis test for the population mean difference:

H0=Nullhypothesis(H)a=AlternativehypothesisH0:μd=0Ha:μd0Nowwewilldeterminethevalueofteststatistics:t=x¯d-μdsdnt=1.57-02.70303.185

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of test statistics.

Degree of freedom n-1=30-1=29

The test is a two-tailed test so we double the boundaries of the P-value.

0.002=20.001<P<20.0025=0.005nowatt=3.185anddegreeoffreedom=30-1=29,pvalue=0.00344

If P-value is less than the significance level then reject the null hypothesis

P<0.01RejectH0

Yes, there is convincing evidence at the α=0.01significance level that the number of words recalled in silence or when listening to music differs, on average, for students at this school

05

Part (c): Step 1: Given information

We have been given that we have a random sample of 30students and the mean difference was 1.57and the standard deviation of the differences was 2.70.

We need to find out that based on part a which type of error—a Type I error or a Type II error—could we have made.

06

Part (c): Step 2: Explanation

We could have only made a Type I error (if we made an error) because we have rejected the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Children make choices Many new products introduced into the market are

targeted toward children. The choice behavior of children with regard to new products is of particular interest to companies that design marketing strategies for these products. As part of one study, randomly selected children in different age groups were compared on their ability to sort new products into the correct product category (milk or juice). Here are some of the data:

Researchers want to know if a greater proportion of 6- to 7-year-olds can sort correctly than 4- to5-year-olds.

a. State appropriate hypotheses for performing a significance test. Be sure to define the parameters of interest.

b. Check if the conditions for performing the test are met.

Have a ball! Can students throw a baseball farther than a softball? To find out, researchers conducted a study involving 24randomly selected students from a large high school. After warming up, each student threw a baseball as far as he or she could and threw a softball as far as he she could, in a random order. The distance in yards for each throw was recorded. Here are the data, along with the difference (Baseball – Softball) in distance thrown, for each student:

a. Explain why these are paired data.

b. A boxplot of the differences is shown. Explain how the graph gives some evidence that students like these can throw a baseball farther than a softball.

c. State appropriate hypotheses for performing a test about the true mean difference. Be sure to define any parameter(s) you use.

d. Explain why the Normal/Large Sample condition is not met in this case. The mean difference (Baseball−Softball) in distance thrown for these 24students is xdiff = 6.54yards. Is this a surprisingly large result if the null hypothesis is true? To find out, we can perform a simulation assuming that students have the same ability to throw a baseball and a softball. For each student, write the two distances thrown on different note cards. Shuffle the two cards and designate one distance to baseball and one distance to softball. Then subtract the two distances (Baseball−Softball) . Do this for all the students and find the simulated mean difference. Repeat many times. Here are the results of 100trials of this simulation

e. Use the results of the simulation to estimate the P-value. What conclusion would you draw ?

Friday the 13thRefer to Exercise 88.

a. Construct and interpret a 90%confidence interval for the true mean difference. If you already defined parameters and checked conditions in Exercise 88, you don’t need to do them again here.

b. Explain how the confidence interval provides more information than the test in Exercise 88.

Artificial trees? An association of Christmas tree growers in Indiana wants to know if there is a difference in preference for natural trees between urban and rural households. So the association sponsored a survey of Indiana households that had a Christmas tree last year to find out. In a random sample of 160rural households, 64had a natural tree. In a separate random sample of 261urban households, 89had a natural tree. A 95%confidence interval for the difference (Rural – Urban) in the true proportion of households in each population that had a natural tree is -0.036to0.154. Does the confidence interval provide convincing evidence that the two population proportions are equal? Explain your answer.

A random sample of 200New York State voters included 88Republicans, while a random sample of 300California voters produced141Republicans. Which of the following represents the 95%confidence interval for the true difference in the proportion of Republicans in New York State and California?

a. (0.440.47)±1.96((0.44)(0.56)+(0.47)(0.53)200+300)

b. (0.440.47)±1.96((0.44)(0.56)200+(0.47)(0.53)300)

c. (0.440.47)±1.96(0.44)(0.56)200+(0.47)(0.53)300

d. (0.440.47)±1.96(0.44)(0.56)+(0.47)(0.53)200+300

e. (0.440.47)±1.96(0.45)(0.55)200+(0.45)(0.55)300

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free