Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Refer to Exercise 38.

a. Find the probability of getting a difference in sample means x¯M−x¯Wx¯M-x¯Wthat’s greater than 2inches.

b. Should we be surprised if the sample mean height for the young men is at least2 inches greater than the sample mean height for the young women? Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part a. The probability is 0.9949

Part b. No.

Step by step solution

01

Part a. Step 1. Given information

From the previous exercise, we have:

μ=4.8σ=1.0883x=2

02

Part a. Step 2. Explanation

The z score is the value decreased by the mean and divided by the standard deviation. Then we have,

z=x-μσ=2-4.81.0883=-2.57

Now we will determine the value of the probability, that is:

P(x¯M-x¯W2)=P(Z>-2.57)=1-P(Z<-2.57)=1-0.0051=0.9949=00.49%

03

Part b. Step 1. Explanation

It is given that:

z=x-μσ=2-4.81.0883=-2.57

And the probability is 0.9949.

Thus, a probability is considered to be small when the probability is less than 0.05.

We then note that the probability of the mean differencex¯M-x¯W being at least two is large which means that it is unlikely that the mean difference is at least two and thus we would be not be surprised if the sample mean height for the young men is at least two inches greater than the sample mean height for the young women. Thus, we should not be surprised.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Broken crackers We don’t like to find broken crackers when we open the package. How can makers reduce breaking? One idea is to microwave the crackers for 30seconds right after baking them. Randomly assign 65newly baked crackers to the microwave and another 65to a control group that is not microwaved. After 1day, none of the microwave group were broken and 16of the control group were broken. Let p1be the true proportions of crackers like these that would break if baked in the microwave and p2be the true proportions of crackers like these that would break if not microwaved. Check if the conditions for calculating a confidence interval forp1-p2met.

Better barley Does drying barley seeds in a kiln increase the yield of barley? A famous experiment by William S. Gosset (who discovered the t distributions) investigated this question. Eleven pairs of adjacent plots were marked out in a large field. For each pair, regular barley seeds were planted in one plot and kiln-dried seeds were planted in the other. A coin flip was used to determine which plot in each pair got the regular barley seed and which got the kiln-dried seed. The following table displays the data on barley yield (pound per acre) for each plot.

Do these data provide convincing evidence at the α=0.05level that drying barley seeds in a kiln increases the yield of barley, on average?

A researcher wants to determine whether or not a 5-week crash diet is effective over a long period of time. A random sample of 15five-week crash dieters is selected. Each person’s weight (in pounds) is recorded before starting the diet and 1year after it is concluded. Do the data provide convincing evidence that 5-week crash dieters weigh less, on average, 1year after finishing the diet?

Artificial trees? An association of Christmas tree growers in Indiana wants to know if there is a difference in preference for natural trees between urban and rural households. So the association sponsored a survey of Indiana households that had a Christmas tree last year to find out. In a random sample of 160rural households, 64had a natural tree. In a separate random sample of 261urban households, 89had a natural tree. A 95%confidence interval for the difference (Rural – Urban) in the true proportion of households in each population that had a natural tree is -0.036to0.154. Does the confidence interval provide convincing evidence that the two population proportions are equal? Explain your answer.

Which of the following describes a Type II error in the context of this study?

a. Finding convincing evidence that the true means are different for males and females when in reality the true means are the same

b. Finding convincing evidence that the true means are different for males and females when in reality the true means are different

c. Not finding convincing evidence that the true means are different for males and females when in reality the true means are the same

d. Not finding convincing evidence that the true means are different for males and females when in reality the true means are different

e. Not finding convincing evidence that the true means are different for males and females when in reality there is convincing evidence that the true means are different.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free