Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The National Halothane Study was a major investigation of the safety of anesthetics used in surgery. Records of over 850,000operations performed in 34major hospitals showed the following death rates for four common anesthetics:

There seems to be a clear association between the anesthetic used and the death rate of patients. Anesthetic C appears to be more dangerous.

a. Explain why we call the National Halothane Study an observational study rather than an experiment, even though it compared the results of using different anesthetics in actual surgery.

b. Identify the explanatory and response variables in this study.

c. When the study looked at other variables that are related to a doctor’s choice of anesthetic, it found that Anesthetic C was not causing extra deaths. Explain the concept of confounding in this context and identify a variable that might be confounded with the doctor’s choice of anesthetic.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. Since records are used, no treatment was deliberately imposed on individuals and thus the study is an observational study.

b. The experimental variable is the anaesthetics and the response variable is the effect of the anaesthetic that is the death rate.

c. The type of the surgery is the variable.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1. Explanation

The National Halothane study an observational study rather than an experiment even though it compared the results of using different anaesthetics in actual surgery because An experiment deliberately imposes some treatment on individuals in order to observe their responses. An observational study tries to gather information without disturbing the scene they are observing.

Since records are used, no treatment was deliberately imposed on individuals and thus the study is an observational study.

02

Part (b) Step 1. Explanation

The explanatory variable is the one that is changed in order to see the effect on the response variable.

The experimental variable is the anaesthetics used in the surgery because it is used in the experiment and its result is the response variable is the effect of the anaesthetic that is the death rate controlled by the anaesthetics.

03

Part (c) Step 1. Explanation

Variables are confounded when their effects on a response variable cannot be distinguished. One possible confounding variable is type of surgery. If one anaesthesia is used more often with a type of surgery that has a higher death rate anyway, we wouldn’t know if the death rate was higher because of the anaesthesia type or the surgery type.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Miami's car colorsUsing a webcam, a traffic analyst selected a random sample of 800cars traveling on I-195in Miami on a weekday morning. Among the 800cars in the sample, 24%were white. The margin of error for this estimate is 3.0percentage points.

a. Would you be surprised if a census revealed that 26%of cars onI-195 in Miami on a weekday morning were white? Explain your answer.

b. Explain how the traffic analyst could decrease the margin of error.

A louse-y situation A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine compared two medicines to treat head lice: an oral medication called ivermectin and a topical lotion containing malathion. Researchers studied 812 people in 376 households in seven areas around the world. Of the 185 households randomly assigned to ivermectin, 171 were free from head lice after 2 weeks, compared with only 151 of the 191 households randomly assigned to malathion.

a. Calculate the difference (Ivermectin – Malathion) in the proportion of households that were free from head lice in the two groups.

One hundred trials of a simulation were performed to see what differences in proportions would occur due only to chance variation in the random assignment, assuming that the type of medication doesn’t matter. The results are shown in the dotplot.

b. There is one dot at 0.09. Explain what this dot means in this context.

c. Use the results of the simulation to determine if the difference in proportions from part (a) is statistically significant. Explain your reasoning.

A simple random sample of 1200 adult Americans is selected, and each person is asked

the following question: “In light of the huge national deficit, should the government at this

time spend additional money to send humans to Mars?” Only 39% of those responding

answered “Yes.” This survey

a. is reasonably accurate because it used a large simple random sample.

b. needs to be larger because only about 24 people were drawn from each state.

c. probably understates the percent of people who favor sending humans to Mars.

d. is very inaccurate but neither understates nor overstates the percent of people who favor

sending humans to Mars. Because simple random sampling was used, it is unbiased.

e. probably overstates the percent of people who favor sending humans to Mars.

Tonya wanted to estimate the average amount of time that students at her school spend on Facebook each day. She gets an alphabetical roster of students in the school from the registrar’s office and numbers the students from 1 to 1137. Then Tonya uses a random number generator to pick 30 distinct labels from 1 to 1137. She surveys those 30 students about their Facebook use. Tonya’s sample is a simple random sample because

a. it was selected using a chance process.

b. it gave every individual the same chance to be selected.

c. it gave every possible sample of size 30 an equal chance to be selected.

d. it doesn’t involve strata or clusters.

e. it is guaranteed to be representative of the population.

Foster care versus orphanages Do abandoned children placed in foster homes do better than similar children placed in an institution? The Bucharest Early Intervention Project found statistically significant evidence that they do. The subjects were 136young children abandoned at birth and living in orphanages in Bucharest, Romania. Half of the children, chosen at random, were placed in foster homes. The other half remained in the orphanages. (Foster care was not easily available in Romania at the time and so was paid for by the study.) What conclusion can we draw from this study? Explain your reasoning.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free