Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Can a vegetarian or low-salt diet reduce blood pressure? Men with high blood pressure are

assigned at random to one of four diets: (1) normal diet with unrestricted salt; (2)

vegetarian with unrestricted salt; (3) normal with restricted salt; and (4) vegetarian with

restricted salt. This experiment has

  1. one factor, the type of diet.
  2. two factors, high blood pressure and type of diet.
  3. two factors, normal/vegetarian diet and unrestricted/restricted salt.
  4. three factors, men, high blood pressure, and type of diet.
  5. four factors, the four diets being compared.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Our required answer is option (c): two factors, normal/vegetarian diet and unrestricted/restricted salt.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

We need to find out number of factors in experiment given to us. Experiment has four diets:

  1. normal diet with unrestricted salt.
  2. vegetarian with unrestricted salt.
  3. normal with restricted salt.
  4. vegetarian with restricted salt.
02

Explanation

Factors are variables whose levels are changed by the experimenter, and hence these variables are within his control.

Four diets given in experiment are:

  • normal diet with unrestricted salt.
  • vegetarian with unrestricted salt.
  • normal with restricted salt.
  • vegetarian with restricted salt.

We can see that we have either normal or vegetarian diet. So this can be considered as one of the factor. And we have also options between restricted and unrestricted salt that is second factor of our experiment.

So concluding we have two factors that are normal/vegetarian diet and unrestricted/restricted salt in our experiment.

Hence, option cis our required answer.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Researchers randomly selected1700 people from Canada who had never suffered a

heart attack and rated the happiness of each person. Ten years later, the researchers

followed up with each person and found that people who were initially rated as happy

They were less likely to have a heart problem.

Which of the following is the most

appropriate conclusion based on this study?

a. Happiness causes better heart health for all people.

b. Happiness causes better heart health for Canadians.

c. Happiness causes better heart health for the1700people in the study.

d. Happier people in Canada are less likely to have heart problems.

e. Happier people in the study were less likely to have heart problems.

Suppose that 35% of the voters in a state are registered as Republicans, 40% as

Democrats, and 25% as Independents. A newspaper wants to select a sample of 1000

registered voters to predict the outcome of the next election. If it randomly selects 350

Republicans, randomly selects 400 Democrats, and randomly selects 250 Independents,

did this sampling procedure result in a simple random sample of registered voters from

this state?

a. Yes, because each registered voter had the same chance of being chosen.

b. Yes, because random chance was involved.

c. No, because not all registered voters had the same chance of being chosen.

d. No, because a different number of registered voters was selected from each party.

e. No, because not all possible groups of 1000 registered voters had the same chance of

being chosen.

Weekend birthdays Over the years, the percentage of births that are planned cesarean

sections has been rising. Because doctors can schedule these deliveries, there might be

more children born during the week and fewer born on the weekend than if births were

uniformly distributed throughout the week. To investigate, Mrs. McDonald and her class

selected an SRS of 73people born since1993 . Of these people, 24were born on Friday,

Saturday, or Sunday. To determine if these data provide convincing evidence that fewer than43%37 of people born since 1993were born on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday, 100simulated SRSs were selected. Each dot in the graph shows the number of people that were born on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday in a simulated SRS of 73people, assuming that each person

had a 43%chance of being born on one of these three days.

a. Explain how the graph illustrates the concept of sampling variability.

b. Based on the data from the study and the results of the simulation, is there convincing

evidence that fewer than 43%of people born since 1993were born on Friday, Saturday,

or Sunday? Explain your answer.

Foster care versus orphanages Do abandoned children placed in foster homes do better than similar children placed in an institution? The Bucharest Early Intervention Project found statistically significant evidence that they do. The subjects were 136young children abandoned at birth and living in orphanages in Bucharest, Romania. Half of the children, chosen at random, were placed in foster homes. The other half remained in the orphanages. (Foster care was not easily available in Romania at the time and so was paid for by the study.) What conclusion can we draw from this study? Explain your reasoning.

Layoffs and โ€œsurvivor guiltโ€ Workers who survive a layoff of other employees at their location may suffer from โ€œsurvivor guilt.โ€ A study of survivor guilt and its effects used as subjects 120students who were offered an opportunity to earn extra course credit by doing proofreading. Each subject worked in the same cubicle as another student, who was an accomplice of the experimenters. At a break midway through the work, one of three things happened:

Treatment 1: The accomplice was told to leave; it was explained that this was because she performed poorly.

Treatment 2: It was explained that unforeseen circumstances meant there was only enough work for one person. By โ€œchance,โ€ the accomplice was chosen to be laid off.

Treatment 3: Both students continued to work after the break. The subjectsโ€™ work performance after the break was compared with their performance before the break. Overall, subjects worked harder when told the other studentโ€™s dismissal was random.

Describe how you would randomly assign the subjects to the treatments

a. using slips of paper.

b. using technology.

c. using Table D.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free