Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Child care and aggression A study of child care enrolled 1364 infants and followed them through their sixth year in school. Later, the researchers published an article in which they stated that “the more time children spent in child care from birth to age 4½, the more adults tended to rate them, both at age 4½and at kindergarten, as less likely to get along with others, as more assertive, as disobedient, and as aggressive.”

a. What are the explanatory and response variables?

b. Is this an observational study or an experiment? Justify your answer.

c. Does this study show that child care makes children more aggressive? Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part(a) The explanatory variable is the amount of time children spend in child care as newborns, and the response variable is hostility at an older age.
Part(b)The research is based on observation.

Part(c) No, this study does not show that child care makes children more aggressive

Step by step solution

01

Part(a) Step 1 : Given information

We need to find explanatory and response variables for given study.

02

Part(a) Step 2 : Simplify

In this study, infants are followed through their sixth year of school to see if the amount of time they spend in child care has an impact on their personalities, such as if they are more assertive, disobedient, or aggressive.
As a result, we may argue that time spent in child care is an independent variable, whereas violence at an older age is a dependent variable because it is reliant on time spent.
As a result, the time spent in child care as a newborn is an explanatory variable, while violence at a later age is a response variable.

03

Part(b) Step 1 : Given information

We need to find is this an observational study or an experiment.

04

Part(b) Step 2 : Simplify

The children were observed throughout their sixth year of school in this study, but the researchers had no influence over the youngsters and hence no treatments were administered to them.
As a result, the researchers did not assign therapies to the children, making this an observational study.

05

Part(c) Step 1 : Given information

We need to find that does this study show that child care makes children more aggressive.

06

Part(c) Step 2 : Simplify

We learn that the study is an observational study in portion (b).
Because the outcome could be influenced by the hidden variables, it is impossible to say if child care is the source of the infants' aggressiveness.
The temperament of the parents could be a hidden variable, as children tend to have the same temperament as their parents, and the temperament of the parents could impact their decision to leave the child in child care.
It is preferable to conduct an experiment rather than an observational research since there is less likelihood of the lurking variable influencing the outcome.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Improving response rate -How can we reduce the rate of refusals in telephone surveys? Most people who answer at all listen to the interviewer’s introductory remarks and then decide whether to continue. One study made telephone calls to randomly selected households to ask opinions about the next election. In some calls, the interviewer gave her name; in others, she identified the university she was representing; and in still others, she identified both herself and the university. For each type of call, the interviewer either did or did not offer to send a copy of the final survey results to the person interviewed.

a. List the factors in this experiment and state how many levels each factor has.

b. If the researchers used every possible combination to form the treatments, how many treatments were included in the experiment?

c. List two of the treatments.

Tonya wanted to estimate the average amount of time that students at her school spend on Facebook each day. She gets an alphabetical roster of students in the school from the registrar’s office and numbers the students from 1 to 1137. Then Tonya uses a random number generator to pick 30 distinct labels from 1 to 1137. She surveys those 30 students about their Facebook use. Tonya’s sample is a simple random sample because

a. it was selected using a chance process.

b. it gave every individual the same chance to be selected.

c. it gave every possible sample of size 30 an equal chance to be selected.

d. it doesn’t involve strata or clusters.

e. it is guaranteed to be representative of the population.

Sampling the forestTo gather data on a 1200-acre pine forest in Louisiana, the U.S. Forest Service laid a grid of 1410equally spaced circular plots over a map of the forest. A ground survey visited a sample of 10%of the plots.

a. Explain how you would use a random number generator to choose an SRS of 141plots. Your description should be clear enough for a classmate to carry out your plan.

b. Use your method from part (a) to choose the first 3plots.

Foster care versus orphanages Do abandoned children placed in foster homes do better than similar children placed in an institution? The Bucharest Early Intervention Project found statistically significant evidence that they do. The subjects were 136young children abandoned at birth and living in orphanages in Bucharest, Romania. Half of the children, chosen at random, were placed in foster homes. The other half remained in the orphanages. (Foster care was not easily available in Romania at the time and so was paid for by the study.) What conclusion can we draw from this study? Explain your reasoning.

A louse-y situation A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine compared two medicines to treat head lice: an oral medication called ivermectin and a topical lotion containing malathion. Researchers studied 812 people in 376 households in seven areas around the world. Of the 185 households randomly assigned to ivermectin, 171 were free from head lice after 2 weeks, compared with only 151 of the 191 households randomly assigned to malathion.

a. Calculate the difference (Ivermectin – Malathion) in the proportion of households that were free from head lice in the two groups.

One hundred trials of a simulation were performed to see what differences in proportions would occur due only to chance variation in the random assignment, assuming that the type of medication doesn’t matter. The results are shown in the dotplot.

b. There is one dot at 0.09. Explain what this dot means in this context.

c. Use the results of the simulation to determine if the difference in proportions from part (a) is statistically significant. Explain your reasoning.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free