Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Improving health A large company's medical director launches a health promotion campaign to encourage employees to exercise more and eat better foods. One measure of the effectiveness of such a program is a drop in blood pressure. The director chooses a random sample of 50employees and compares their blood pressures from physical cams given before the campaign and again a year later. The mean change (after - before) in systolic blood pressure for these 50employees is -6and the standard deviation is 19.8.

(a) Do these data provide convincing evidence of an average decrease in blood pressure among all of the company's employees during this year? Carry out a test at the α=0.05significance level.

(b) Can we conclude that the health campaign caused a decrease in blood pressure? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Yes, there is sufficient evidence

(b)No

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1 : Given Information 

Given in the question that,

Population meanμ=0

Sample mean(x)=-6

Sample sizen=50

Sample standard deviations=19.8we have to find Do these data provide convincing evidence of an average decrease in blood pressure among all of the company's employees during this year.

02

Part (a) Step 2 :Explanation

The formula to compute the test statistic is:

t=x-μsn

using the information, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

H0:μ=0

Hα:μ<0

H0:μ<0

Using the Ti-83 calculator the output is:

The p-value is less than the significance level. Thus, decision is written as the rejection of the null hypothesis

At 5%significance level, there are sufficient evidence to support the provided claim.

03

 Part (b) Step 1: Given Information

Given in the question that,

Population meanμ=0

Sample meanx¯=-6

Sample sizen=50

Sample standard deviations=19.8we have to find Can we conclude that the health campaign caused a decrease in blood pressure.

04

Part (b) Step 2: Explanation 

Because the outcome of an observational study is unaffected, and the case presented is an observational study. As a result, no conclusion can be formed at this time.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is significance good for? Which of the following questions does a significance test answer? Justify your answer.

(a) Is the sample or experiment properly designed?

(b) Is the observed effect due to chance?

(c) Is the observed effect important?

Study more! A student group claims that first-year students at a university study 2.5hours per night during the school week. A skeptic suspects that they study less than that on average. He takes a random sample of 30first-year students and finds that x=137minutes and sx=45minutes. A graph of the data shows no outliers but some skewness. Carry out an appropriate significance test at the 5%significance level. What conclusion do you draw?

After checking that conditions are met, you perform a significance test of H0:μ=1versus Hα:μ1. You obtain a Pvalue of 0.022. Which of the following is true?

(a) A95%confidence interval for μwill include the value 1

(b) A 95%confidence interval forμwill include the value 0.

(c) A99% confidence interval forμwill include the value 1

(d) A 99%confidence interval for μwill include the value 0

(e) None of these is necessarily true.

Refer to Exercise 1. In Simon’s SRS, 16 of the students were left-handed. A significance test yields a P-value of 0.2184.

(a) Interpret this result in context.

(b) Do the data provide convincing evidence against the null hypothesis? Explain.

For the job satisfaction study described in Section 9.1, the hypotheses are

H0:μ=0Ha:μisnotequalto0

where μis the mean difference in job satisfaction scores (self-paced machine-paced) in the population of assembly-line workers at the company. Data from a random sample of 18workers gave x=17and sx=60

Calculate the test statistic. Show your work.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free