Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A local high school makes a change that should improve student satisfaction with the parking situation. Before the change, 37% of the school’s students approved of the parking that was provided. After the change, the principal surveys an SRS of 200 of the over 2500 students at the school. In all, 83 students say that they approve of the new parking arrangement. The principal cites this as evidence that the change was effective. Perform a test of the principal’s claim at the α=0.05 significance level.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is not enough evidence to conclude the principal’s claim at5%significance level.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

Percentage of students approved of the parking that was provided = 37%

After the change, the principal surveys an SRS of 200of the over 2500students at the school.

The number of students that approve of the new parking arrangement = 80

02

Explanation

The number of students is n = 200

The number of students that approve of the new parking arrangement is x = 83

Population proportion is p = role="math" localid="1654320587832" 37%=0.37

p0=1-p=1-0.37=0.63

Calculating, p-=xn=83200=0.415

The null and alternative hypotheses,

H0:p=0.37Ha:p>0.37

Using,

role="math" localid="1654321022197" z=p-p0P01p0n=0.415-0.630.63(0.37)200=0.0937

Hence there is not enough evidence to conclude the principal’s claim at 5%as the p-value is less than the significance levelα=0.05

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Slow response times by paramedics, firefighters, and policemen can have serious consequences for accident victims. In the case of life-threatening injuries, victims generally need medical attention within 8 minutes of the accident. Several cities have begun to monitor emergency response times. In one such city, the mean response time to all accidents involving life-threatening injuries last year was M 6.7 minutes. Emergency personnel arrived within 8 minutes after 78% of all calls involving life-threatening injuries last year. The city manager shares this information and encourages these first responders to “do better.” At the end of the year, the city manager selects an SRS of 400 calls involving life-threatening injuries and examines the response times.

(a) State hypotheses for a significance test to determine whether the average response time has decreased. Be sure to define the parameter of interest.

(b) Describe a Type I error and a Type II error in this setting, and explain the consequences of each.

(c) Which is more serious in this setting: a Type I error or a Type II error? Justify your answer.

Pressing pills A drug manufacturer forms tablets by compressing a granular material that contains the active ingredient and various fillers. The hardness of a sample from each batch of tablets produced is measured to control the compression process. The target value for the hardness is μ=11.5. The hardness data for a random sample of 20tablets are

11.62711.61311.49311.60211.36011.37411.59211.45811.55211.46311.38311.71511.48511.50911.42911.47711.57011.62311.47211.531

Is there significant evidence at the5% level that the mean hardness of the tablets differs from the target value? Carry out an appropriate support your answer.

A software company is trying to decide whether to produce an upgrade of one of its programs. Customers would have to pay \(100for the upgrade. For the upgrade to be profitable, the company needs to sell it to more than 20%of their customers. You contact a random sample of 60customers and find that 16 would be willing to pay \)100for the upgrade.

(a) Do the sample data give good evidence that more than 20%of the company’s customers are willing to purchase the upgrade? Carry out an appropriate test at the A=0.05significance level.

(b) Which would be a more serious mistake in this setting—a Type I error or a Type II error? Justify your answer.

(c) Other than increasing the sample size, describe one way to increase the power of the test in (a).

Flu vaccine A drug company has developed a new vaccine for preventing the flu. The company claims that fewer than 5%of adults who use its vaccine will get the flu. To test the claim, researchers give the vaccine to a random sample of 1000adults. Of these, 43get the flu.

(a) Do these data provide convincing evidence to support the company's claim? Perform an appropriate test to support your answer.

(b) Which kind of mistake - a Type I error or a Type II error-could you have made in (a)? Explain.

(c) From the company's point of view, would a Type I error or Type Il error be more serious? Why?

According to the Web site sleepdeprivation.com, 85% of teens are getting less than

eight hours of sleep a night. Jannie wonders whether this result holds in her large high school. She asks an SRS of 100 students at the school how much sleep they get on a typical night. In all, 75 of the responders said less than 8 hours.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free