Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Reporting cheating What proportion of students

are willing to report cheating by other students? A

student project put this question to an SRS of 172

undergraduates at a large university: “You witness two

students cheating on a quiz. Do you go to the professor?”

The Minitab output below shows the results of a

significance test and a 95% confidence interval based

on the survey data.18

(a) Define the parameter of interest.

(b) Check that the conditions for performing the significance test are met in this case.

(c) Interpret the P-value in context.

(d) Do these data give convincing evidence that the actual population proportion differs from 0.15? Justify your answer with appropriate evidence.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part (a) Population proportion

Part (b) If p-value is less than 0.05 implies the test is significant.

Part (c) 0.146>0.05, Test is not significant.

Part (d) No conclusion can be drawn

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1. Parameter of interest

The Minitab output represents the confidence interval of the population proportion. So, the parameter of interest is the population proportion.

02

Part (b) Step 1. Decision Criteria 

The criteria for testing whether the hypothesis test is significant or not. In other words, if the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis is less than 0.05 implies that the test is significant.

03

Part (c) Step 1. Interpretation

It can be observed that the p-value is less than 0.05, that is,

0.146>0.05

As a result, the test is insignificant as there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

04

Part (d)  Step 1 Conclusion 

It can be observed that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and the test is not significant. So, no conclusion can be made about the claim.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Does this paper give convincing evidence that the mean amount of sugar in the hindguts under these conditions is not equal to 7mg? Justify your answer.

Which of the following 95%confidence intervals would lead us to reject H0 : p=0.30 in favor of

Ha :p not equal to 0.30 at the 5% significance level?

(a)(0.29,0.38)(c)(0.27,0.31)(e)Noneofthese(b)(0.19,0.27)(d)(0.24,0.30)

An SRS of 100 postal employees found that the average time these employees had worked at the postal service was 7years with standard deviation 2years. Do these data provide convincing evidence that the mean time of employment M for the population of postal employees has changed from the value of 7.5 that was true 20years ago? To determine this, we test the hypotheses H0:μ=7.5versus Ha:μ7.5using a one-sample ttest. What conclusion should we draw at the 5%significance level?

(a) There is convincing evidence that the mean time working with the postal service has changed.

(b) There is not convincing evidence that the mean time working with the postal service has changed.

(c) There is convincing evidence that the mean time working with the postal service is still 7.5 years.

(d) There is convincing evidence that the mean time working with the postal service is now 7years.

(e) We cannot draw a conclusion at the 5% significance level. The sample size is too small.

“I can’t get through my day without coffee” is a common statement from many students. Assumed benefits include keeping students awake during lectures and making them more alert for exams and tests. Students in a statistics class designed an experiment to measure memory retention with and without drinking a cup of coffee one hour before a test. This experiment took place on two different days in the same week (Monday and Wednesday). Ten students were used. Each student received no coffee or one cup of coffee, one hour before the test on a particular day. The test consisted of a series of words flashed on a screen, after which the student had to write down as many of the words as possible. On the other day, each student received a different amount of coffee (none or one cup). (a) One of the researchers suggested that all the subjects in the experiment drink no coffee before Monday’s test and one cup of coffee before Wednesday’s test. Explain to the researcher why this is a bad idea and suggest a better method of deciding when each subject receives the two treatments.

(b) The data from the experiment are provided in the table below. Set up and carry out an appropriate test to determine whether there is convincing evidence that drinking coffee improves memory.

What is significance good for? Which of the following questions does a significance test answer? Justify your answer.

(a) Is the sample or experiment properly designed?

(b) Is the observed effect due to chance?

(c) Is the observed effect important?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free