Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

I collect an SRS of size n from a population and compute a 95%confidence interval for the population proportion. Which of the following would produce a new confidence interval with larger width (larger margin of error) based on these same data?

(a) Use a larger confidence level.

(b) Use a smaller confidence level.

(c) Increase the sample size.

(d) Use the same confidence level, but compute the interval n times. Approximately5% of these intervals will be larger.

(e) Nothing can guarantee absolutely that you will get a larger interval. One can only say that the chance of obtaining a larger interval is 0.05.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Correct answer is (a) Use a larger confidence level

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Given in the question that, I collect an SRS of size nfrom a population and compute a 95%confidence interval for the population proportion .

02

Explanation

(a) A larger confidence level leads to better accuracy and thus the confidence interval will becomes wider.

(b) A smaller confidence level will decrease the accuracy and thus lessen the width of the confidence interval.

(c) Increasing the sample size increases the accuracy and thus the width of the confidence interval decreases.

(d) This method does not lead to ONE larger confidence interval.

(e) Incorrect, because (a) is a valid method to obtain a larger interval.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A researcher plans to use a random sample of n=500families to estimate the mean monthly family income for a large population. A99%confidence interval based on the sample would be ______ than a 90% confidence interval.

(a) narrower and would involve a larger risk of being incorrect

(b) wider and would involve a smaller risk of being incorrect

(c) narrower and would involve a smaller risk of being incorrect

(d) wider and would involve a larger risk of being incorrect

(e) wider, but it cannot be determined whether the risk of being incorrect would be larger or smaller

Prayer in school A New York Times/CBS News Poll asked the question, โ€œDo you favor an amendment to the Constitution that would permit organized prayer in public schools?โ€ Sixty-six percent of the sample answered โ€œYes.โ€ The article describing the poll says that it โ€œis based on telephone interviews conducted from Sept. 13 to Sept. 18 with 1664adults around the United States, excluding Alaska and Hawaii. . . . The telephone numbers were formed by random digits, thus permitting access to both listed and unlisted residential numbers.โ€ The article gives the margin of error for a 95%confidence level as 3percentage points.

(a) Explain what the margin of error means to someone who knows little statistics.

(b) State and interpret the 95% confidence interval.

(c) Interpret the confidence level.

What inference method will you use? Check that the conditions for using this procedure are met.

In a poll,

I. Some people refused to answer questions.

II. People without telephones could not be in the sample.

III. Some people never answered the phone in several calls.

Which of these sources is included in the ยฑ2%margin of error announced for the poll?

(a) I only

(b) II only

(c) III only

(d) I, II, and III

(e) None of these

Power lines and cancer (4.2,4.3)Does living near power lines cause leukemia in children? The

National Cancer Institute spent 5 years and $5million gathering data on this question. The researchers compared 638children who had leukemia with620who did not. They went into the homes and actually measured the magnetic fields in children's bedrooms, in other rooms, and at the front door. They recorded facts about power lines near the family home and also near the mother's residence when she was pregnant. Result: no connection between leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of the kind produced by power lines was found.

(a) Was this an observational study or an experiment? Justify your answer.

(b) Does this study show that living near power lines doesn't cause cancer? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free