Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Coaching and SAT scores (10.2) What we really want to know is whether coached students improve more than uncoached students and whether any advantage is large enough to be worth paying for. Use the information above to answer these questions:

(a) Is there good evidence that coached students gained more on average than uncoached students? Carry out a significance test to answer this question.

(b) How much more do coach students gain on the average? Construct and interpret a 99% confidence interval.

(c) Based on your work, what is your opinion: do you think coaching courses are worth paying for?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a). Yes, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that coached students are getting more on average than the uncoached students.

b). Thus, the confidence interval is (1.0002,15).

c). No, it is not worth paying.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step1: Given Information

x¯1=29,x¯2=21

s1=59,s2=52

n1=427,n2=2733

02

Part (a) Step 2: Explanation

The test statistic formula is:

t=x¯1-x¯2s12n1+s22n2

The null and alternative hypotheses for the provided case are:

H0:μ1=μ2

H1:μ1μ2

The test statistic is computed as:

t=x¯1-x¯2-μ1-μ2s12n1+s22n2

=29-21592427+5222733

=2.646

03

Part (a) Step 3: Explanation

The degree of freedom is calculated as:

df=minn1-1,n2-1=min(427-1,2733-1)=426

The p-value:

P-value=0.0042

In this case, P-value =0.00424>0.05

The null hypothesis could not be rejected which is not showing the sufficient evidences for the claim at significance level of 5%.

04

Part (b) Step 1: Given Information

Confidence level is95%.

05

Part (b) Step 2: Explanation

The 95%confidence interval using Ti-83calculator is:

06

Part (c) Step 1: Given Information

Confidence level is95%.

07

Part (c) Step 2: Explanation

The above computed confidence interval is very close to the value 0 . Thus, no larger gain is being earned which implies that it is not worth paying for.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Toyota or Nissan? Are Toyota or Nissan owners more satisfied with their vehicles? Let’s design a study to find out. We’ll select a random sample of 400Toyota owners and a separate random sample of 400Nissan owners. Then we’ll ask each individual in the sample: “Would you say that you are generally satisfied with your (Toyota/Nissan) vehicle?”

(a) Is this a problem with comparing means or comparing proportions? Explain.

(b) What type of study design is being used to produce data?

41. Literacy rates Do males have higher average literacy rates than females in Islamic countries? The table below shows the percent of men and women at least 15years old who were literate in 2008in the major Islamic nations. (We omitted countries with populations of less than3million.) Data for a few nations, such as Afghanistan and Iraq, were not available.

T10.11. Researchers wondered whether maintaining a patient's body temperature close to normal by heating the patient during surgery would affect wound infection rates. Patients were assigned at random to two groups: the normothermic group (patients' core temperatures were maintained at near normal, 36.5°C, with heating blankets) and the hypothermic group (patients" core temperatures were allowed to decrease to about34.5°C). If keeping patients warm during surgery alters the chance of infection, patients in the two groups should have hospital stays of very different lengths. Here are summary statistics on hospital stay (in number of days) for the two groups:

Groupnx¯sxNormothemic10412.14.4Hypothermic9614.76.5

(a) Construct and interpret a 95%confidence interval for the difference in the true mean length of hospital stay for normothermic and hypothermic patients.

(b) Does your interval in part (a) suggest that keeping patients warm during surgery affects the average length of patients' hospital staves? Justify your answer.

A driving school wants to find out which of its two instructors is more effective at preparing students to pass the state’s driver’s license exam. An incoming class of 100students is randomly assigned to two groups, each of size 50. One group is taught by Instructor A; the other is taught by Instructor B. At the end of the course, 30of Instructor A’s students and 22of Instructor B’s students pass the state exam. Do these results give convincing evidence that Instructor A is more effective?

Min Jae carried out the significance test shown below to answer this question. Unfortunately, he made some mistakes along the way. Identify as many mistakes as you can, and tell how to correct each one.

State: I want to perform a test of

H0:p1-p2=0

Ha:p1-p2>0

where p1=the proportion of Instructor A's students that passed the state exam and p2=the proportion of Instructor B's students that passed the state exam. Since no significance level was stated, I'll use σ=0.05

Plan: If conditions are met, I’ll do a two-sample ztest for comparing two proportions.

Random The data came from two random samples of 50students.

- Normal The counts of successes and failures in the two groups -30,20,22, and 28-are all at least 10.

- Independent There are at least 1000 students who take this driving school's class.

Do: From the data, p^1=2050=0.40and p^2=3050=0.60. So the pooled proportion of successes is

p^C=22+3050+50=0.52

- Test statistic

localid="1650450621864" z=(0.40-0.60)-00.52(0.48)100+0.52(0.48)100=-2.83

- p-value From Table A, localid="1650450641188" P(z-2.83)=1-0.0023=0.9977.

Conclude: The p-value, 0.9977, is greater than α=0.05, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is no convincing evidence that Instructor A's pass rate is higher than Instructor B's.

A better drug? In a pilot study, a company's new cholesterol-reducing drug outperforms the currently available drug. If the data provide convincing

evidence that the mean cholesterol reduction with the new drug is more than 10 milligrams per deciliter of blood (mg/dl) greater than with the current drug, the company will begin the expensive process of mass-producing the new drug. For the 14 subjects who were assigned at random to the current drug, the mean cholesterol reduction was 54.1mg/dlwith a standard deviation of 11.93mg/dl.For the 15 subjects who were randomly assigned to the new drug, the mean cholesterol reduction was 68.7mg/dlwith a standard deviation of13.3mg/dl.Graphs of the data reveal no outliers or strong skewness.

(a) Carry out an appropriate significance test. What conclusion would you draw? (Note that the null hypothesis is notH0:μ1-μ2=0-

(b) Based on your conclusion in part (a), could you have made a Type I error or a Type Il error? Justify your answer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free