Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

For women, pregnancy lasts about 9 months. In other species of animals, the length of time from conception to birth varies. Is there any evidence that the gestation period is related to the animal's lifespan? The first scatterplot shows Gestation Period (in days) vs. Life Expectancy (in years) for 18 species of mammals. The highlighted point at the far right represents humans. a) For these data, \(r=0.54\), not a very strong relationship. Do you think the association would be stronger or weaker if humans were removed? Explain. b) Is there reasonable justification for removing humans from the data set? Explain. c) Here are the scatterplot and regression analysis for the 17 nonhuman species. Comment on the strength of the association. d) Interpret the slope of the line. e) Some species of monkeys have a life expectancy of about 20 years. Estimate the expected gestation period of one of these monkeys.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Removing humans could strengthen the relationship; it's reasonable since humans are outliers. Without humans, the association appears stronger. The slope indicates gestation change per year of life expectancy. Use regression line to estimate for monkeys.

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing the Effect of Removing Humans

Since humans are the outlier with a large life expectancy compared to other mammals, removing them could potentially strengthen the correlation (increase the value of \(r\)), as they may skew the data. Therefore, without the human data point, the relationship might appear stronger.
02

Justification for Removing Humans

Humans have significantly different life expectancy and cultural factors influencing gestation that do not apply to other species. Therefore, it is reasonable to remove them to assess the typical relationship for non-human mammals.
03

Comment on Association Strength Without Humans

After removing humans, if the scatterplot and regression analysis show a correlation coefficient, \(r\), larger than 0.54, it indicates a stronger relationship. The analysis without humans likely shows a clearer trend if the outlier is removed.
04

Interpreting the Slope of the Regression Line

The slope of the line in a linear regression gives the expected change in the gestation period (in days) for each additional year of life expectancy. Thus, it can be interpreted as how much longer the gestation period tends to be for species that live one additional year.
05

Estimating Gestation Period for Monkeys

To estimate the gestation period for monkeys with a life expectancy of 20 years, use the linear equation obtained from the regression analysis: \( \text{Gestation Period} = \text{Intercept} + (20 \times \text{Slope}) \). Substituting 20 for life expectancy provides the estimated gestation period for these monkeys.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scatterplot
A scatterplot is a type of graph that uses Cartesian coordinates to display values of two variables for a set of data. Each dot on the plot represents an observation. In the context of comparing gestation periods and life expectancy across different mammalian species, a scatterplot can be a valuable visualization tool.

The scatterplot reveals how gestation periods relate to life expectancy by displaying these two variables on the x and y axes. Clusters of points and their spread can indicate trends, patterns, or potential correlations. For instance, if points tend to form a line or curve, there might be a relationship between the variables. The scatterplot showing data for 18 species, including humans, can illustrate the degree and nature of the association between gestation period and lifespan.
  • Helps in identifying outliers such as humans with a significantly different life expectancy.
  • Useful for visually assessing if there is a linear relationship between the two variables.
  • Provides a foundation to further analyze with other statistical tools like correlation and regression.
Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient, often represented by the symbol \( r \), measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. It ranges from -1 to 1. A value close to 1 indicates a strong positive relationship, while a value close to -1 indicates a strong negative relationship. A value around 0 suggests no linear relationship.

In our exercise, the correlation coefficient \( r = 0.54 \) suggests a moderate positive relationship between gestation periods and life expectancy among the surveyed species.

Removing an outlier, such as the human data point, may increase \( r \) if humans skew the overall pattern observed among other mammals. This is because outliers can disproportionately influence the correlation, either masking or exaggerating the true relationship of the bulk of the data.
  • Indicates the degree and direction of association between gestation and lifespan.
  • Helps to gauge whether modifications, like removing outliers, make patterns clearer.
  • Aids in determining how linear the observed relationship is.
Regression Analysis
Regression analysis examines the relationship between dependent and independent variables, often to make predictions or understand underlying patterns. It provides a line of best fit through data points in a scatterplot, allowing us to quantify the relationship.

The equation of the line, usually written as \( \text{Gestation Period} = \text{Intercept} + (\text{Slope} \times \text{Life Expectancy}) \), captures this relationship. Here, the slope represents the expected change in the gestation period for each additional year of life expectancy. This interpretation is crucial for understanding how one variable impacts the other in a predictable pattern.

For example, if the regression line after removing human data shows a slope that indicates increasing gestation days with more life expectancy years, this suggests a clearer pattern than when humans were included. For species like monkeys with a life expectancy of 20 years, we can substitute this value into the regression equation to estimate their gestation period.
  • Used for predicting values, such as estimating a monkey's gestation period based on life expectancy.
  • Helps in understanding the nature of the relationship between gestation and lifespan.
  • Provides a statistical method to interpret and quantify patterns observed in a scatterplot.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Here's a plot showing the federal rate on 3 -month Treasury bills from 1950 to 1980 , and a regression model fit to the relationship between the Rate (in \%) and Years since 1950 (www.gpoaccess.gov/eop/). Dependent variable is: Rate R-squared \(=77.4 \% \quad s=1.239\) \(\begin{array}{ll}\text { Variable } & \text { Coefficient } \\ & 0.640282\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{ll}\text { Intercept } & \text { u.to } 40 \\\ \text { Year }-1950 & 0.247637\end{array}\) a) What is the correlation between Rate and Year? b) Interpret the slope and intercept. c) What does this model predict for the interest rate in the year \(2000 ?\) d) Would you expect this prediction to have been accurate? Explain.

A student who has created a linear model is disappointed to find that her \(R^{2}\) value is a very low \(13 \%\) a) Does this mean that a linear model is not appropriate? Explain. b) Does this model allow the student to make accurate predictions? Explain.

A researcher studying violent behavior in elementary school children asks the children's parents how much time each child spends playing computer games and has their teachers rate each child on the level of aggressiveness they display while playing with other children. Suppose that the researcher finds a moderately strong positive correlation. Describe three different possible cause-and-effect explanations for this relationship.

Suppose a researcher studying health issues measures blood pressure and the percentage of body fat for several adult males and finds a strong positive association. Describe three different possible causeand-effect relationships that might be present.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free