Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Association. Suppose you were to collect data for each pair of variables. You want to make a scatterplot. Which variable would you use as the explanatory variable and which as the response variable? Why? What would you expect to see in the scatterplot? Discuss the likely direction, form, and strength. a) Long-distance calls: time (minutes), cost b) Lightning strikes: distance from lightning, time delay of the thunder c) A streetlight: its apparent brightness, your distance from it d) Cars: weight of car, age of owner

Short Answer

Expert verified
Explanatory variables: a) time, b) distance, c) distance, d) age of owner. Likely: a) positive linear, b) positive linear, c) negative non-linear, d) no clear pattern.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

We are tasked with identifying explanatory and response variables for pairs of data, predicting scatterplot characteristics like direction, form, and strength.
02

Determine Variables for Pair a

For long-distance calls, time (minutes) and cost are given. The explanatory variable is usually the one that suggests cause or helps predict. Therefore, time (minutes) is the explanatory variable, and cost is the response variable.
03

Predict Scatterplot for Pair a

As time increases, the cost would likely increase, suggesting a positive direction (direct correlation). The form may be linear if the cost increases consistently with time. Strength would depend on factors affecting call rates.
04

Determine Variables for Pair b

For lightning strikes, the distance from lightning affects the time delay of the thunder. Thus, the distance is the explanatory variable and the time delay is the response variable.
05

Predict Scatterplot for Pair b

As the distance from a lightning strike increases, the time delay of the thunder increases, suggesting a positive direction. The form is likely linear. The strength should be strong, as the speed of sound is fairly constant.
06

Determine Variables for Pair c

For a streetlight, apparent brightness changes with your distance from the light. Distance from the streetlight is the explanatory variable, and apparent brightness is the response variable.
07

Predict Scatterplot for Pair c

As distance increases, apparent brightness decreases, suggesting a negative direction (inverse correlation). It might form a non-linear (possibly exponential decay) pattern. The strength is potentially strong since brightness diminishes rapidly with distance due to the inverse square law.
08

Determine Variables for Pair d

For cars, there isn't a clear causative relationship, but if choosing, the age of the owner might generically seem to influence the weight of car preference. Owner age could be the explanatory variable, while car weight is the response variable.
09

Predict Scatterplot for Pair d

There's no inherent correlation expected in strength or form. We might not predict any specific direction, form, or strength due to the lack of causal or predictable relationship.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Explanatory Variable
An explanatory variable, also known as an independent variable, is the one that is used to explain or predict another variable, known as the response variable. In the context of a scatterplot, the explanatory variable is typically plotted along the x-axis. It represents the variable that you suspect might be influencing or causing changes in another variable. For example, in long-distance phone calls, the time spent on the call (in minutes) is the explanatory variable. We hypothesize that this variable will affect the cost of the call, which would be the response variable. Choosing the right explanatory variable helps us better understand the relationship between variables and predict outcomes more accurately.
Response Variable
The response variable, or the dependent variable, is the outcome you are trying to predict or explain. It is usually plotted on the y-axis in a scatterplot. This variable changes in response to variations in the explanatory variable. Consider the example of a streetlight: as your distance from the light changes, the apparent brightness alters. Here, the apparent brightness is the response variable as it is dependent on the distance from the light. By examining how the response variable changes with different values of the explanatory variable, we can gain insights into the nature and strength of the relationship between the two variables.
Correlation Direction
Correlation direction refers to the general trend seen in a scatterplot, indicating how two variables are related. The direction can be:
  • Positive (Direct Correlation): As the explanatory variable increases, the response variable also increases. An example of this is the relationship between the time spent on a phone call and its cost; more time generally means higher cost.
  • Negative (Inverse Correlation): As the explanatory variable increases, the response variable decreases. For instance, as the distance from a streetlight increases, the apparent brightness decreases.
  • No Correlation: There's no discernible pattern or consistent trend in how the variables are related, such as in the case of car weight versus the age of the owner. Here, no specific correlation or trend might appear because there is no inherent causative relationship.
Understanding these directions helps in interpreting the scatterplot data and predicting the relationships in other similar datasets.
Data Visualization
Data visualization involves representing data in a visual context, like a scatterplot, to make it easier to see patterns, trends, and outliers. Scatterplots are particularly useful as they display the relationship between two quantitative variables. By plotting each pair of corresponding data points from two variables, we can visually analyze how one affects the other. When visualizing data, it is important to:
  • Choose appropriate scales for the axes to accurately reflect the data range.
  • Label each axis with the correct variables to avoid confusion.
  • Look for overall patterns, clusters, or outliers that can inform further analysis or raise questions about underlying causes.
Effective data visualization not only aids in data analysis by providing clear insights into variable relationships but also helps communicate findings in a more intuitive and impactful way.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Association. Suppose you were to collect data for each pair of variables. You want to make a scatterplot. Which variable would you use as the explanatory variable and which as the response variable? Why? What would you expect to see in the scatterplot? Discuss the likely direction, form, and strength. a) Apples: weight in grams, weight in ounces b) Apples: circumference (inches), weight (ounces) c) College freshmen: shoe size, grade point average d) Gasoline: number of miles you drove since filling up, gallons remaining in your tank

Prediction units. The errors in predicting hurricane tracks (examined in this chapter) were given in nautical miles. An ordinary mile is \(0.86898\) nautical miles. Most people living on the Gulf Coast of the United States would prefer to know the prediction errors in miles rather than nautical miles. Explain why converting the errors to miles would not change the correlation between Prediction Error and Year.

Correlation conclusions II. The correlation between Fuel Efficiency (as measured by miles per gallon) and Price of 150 cars at a large dealership is \(r=-0.34\). Explain whether or not each of these possible conclusions is justified: a) The more you pay, the lower the fuel efficiency of your car will be. b) The form of the relationship between Fuel Efficiency and Price is moderately straight. c) There are several outliers that explain the low correlation. d) If we measure Fuel Efficiency in kilometers per liter instead of miles per gallon, the correlation will increase.

Association. Suppose you were to collect data for each pair of variables. You want to make a scatterplot. Which variable would you use as the explanatory variable and which as the response variable? Why? What would you expect to see in the scatterplot? Discuss the likely direction, form, and strength. a) When climbing mountains: altitude, temperature b) For each week: ice cream cone sales, air-conditioner sales c) People: age, grip strength d) Drivers: blood alcohol level, reaction time

Correlation errors. Your Economics instructor assigns your class to investigate factors associated with the gross domestic product (GDP) of nations. Each student examines a different factor (such as Life Expectancy, Literacy Rate, etc.) for a few countries and reports to the class. Apparently, some of your classmates do not understand Statistics very well because you know several of their conclusions are incorrect. Explain the mistakes in their statements below. a) "My very low correlation of \(-0.772\) shows that there is almost no association between \(G D P\) and Infant Mortality Rate." b) "There was a correlation of \(0.44\) between \(G D P\) and Continent."

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free