Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Cellular telephones and life expectancy. A survey of the world's nations in 2004 shows a strong positive correlation between percentage of the country using cell phones and life expectancy in years at birth. a) Does this mean that cell phones are good for your health? b) What might explain the strong correlation?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) No, correlation does not imply causation. b) The correlation could reflect socio-economic factors or development level.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Correlation and Causation

Correlation indicates a statistical relationship between two variables, where changes in one variable are associated with changes in another. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because cell phone usage and life expectancy are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.
02

Evaluating the Health Impact of Cell Phones

To determine if cell phones are good for health, we need to establish causation through rigorous scientific studies demonstrating that cell phone usage directly improves health. The correlation alone, without such evidence, does not support the conclusion that cell phones have a beneficial impact on health.
03

Exploring Other Possible Explanations

The strong correlation between cell phone usage and life expectancy could be due to other factors. For instance, countries with higher percentages of cell phone users might also have better healthcare systems, higher incomes, or more developed economies, all contributing to longer life expectancies.
04

Considering Socio-Economic Factors

Countries with more access to technology, including cell phones, often have higher levels of socio-economic development. This development often correlates with better education, improved healthcare, and infrastructure, which can lead to higher life expectancy. Therefore, the correlation observed may be a reflection of the general advances accompanying economic development and not the direct effect of cell phone usage.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Life Expectancy
Life expectancy is the average number of years a person can expect to live. It serves as a key indicator of a nation’s health and well-being. This metric is influenced by various factors, including healthcare, living standards, and lifestyle choices. Increases in life expectancy often suggest that a country is making strides in improving disease prevention and healthcare access.

However, it is important to understand that life expectancy is just an average. It doesn't capture individual differences in health, genetics, or personal circumstances. Nonetheless, by examining life expectancy trends and related data, we can glean insights into the broader health patterns of a population.
Socio-Economic Factors
Socio-economic factors pertain to the social and economic conditions that affect people's lives. Key elements include income level, education, occupation, and cultural influences. These factors significantly influence health outcomes and quality of life.

A nation with high socio-economic development typically provides its citizens with better healthcare and education systems. Access to quality healthcare allows for better prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. Education increases health literacy, empowering individuals to make informed health choices. Therefore, the socio-economic context greatly shapes a nation's life expectancy.
  • Higher income levels often lead to better access to healthcare services.
  • Improved education fosters greater health awareness and healthier lifestyles.
  • Stable occupations and jobs lead to better access to fresh food and a safer living environment.
Health Impact
When discussing the health impact of technology like cellular phones, it's essential to differentiate between correlation and causation. Correlation is simply a relationship between two variables, while causation indicates that one variable actually causes the other to change.

In the case of cell phones, their widespread usage may correlate with life expectancy, but this doesn't necessarily imply that using cell phones leads to longer life spans. For cell phones to be considered beneficial for health, there must be direct evidence showing a health-enhancing impact.

Moreover, while cell phones offer features like health apps or easy access to health information, attributing life expectancy improvements to these factors alone would be an oversimplification. A thorough investigation with controlled studies would be needed to establish any direct health benefits of cell phone usage.
Cellular Usage
Cellular usage refers to the prevalence of mobile phone adoption and how individuals use these devices in their daily lives. In today's world, mobile phones are almost ubiquitous and offer various benefits, such as connectivity, access to information, and convenience.

High cellular usage often mirrors a country's technological advancement and integration into the global digital economy. It can also reflect the general affluence of a nation, as people need disposable income to afford mobile devices. This affluence, development, and connectivity can inadvertently correlate with better healthcare systems and infrastructure, explaining the observed strong correlation with life expectancy.
  • Mobile phones enable better communication and coordination of healthcare services.
  • They offer quick access to emergency services and information.
  • Usage patterns can reflect broader socio-economic trends.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Association. A researcher investigating the association between two variables collected some data and was surprised when he calculated the correlation. He had expected to find a fairly strong association, yet the correlation was near 0 . Discouraged, he didn't bother making a scatterplot. Explain to him how the scatterplot could still reveal the strong association he anticipated.

Association. Suppose you were to collect data for each pair of variables. You want to make a scatterplot. Which variable would you use as the explanatory variable and which as the response variable? Why? What would you expect to see in the scatterplot? Discuss the likely direction, form, and strength. a) When climbing mountains: altitude, temperature b) For each week: ice cream cone sales, air-conditioner sales c) People: age, grip strength d) Drivers: blood alcohol level, reaction time

Baldness and heart disease. Medical researchers followed 1435 middle-aged men for a period of 5 years, measuring the amount of Baldness present (none \(=1\), little \(=2\), some \(=3\), much \(=4\), extreme \(=5\) ) and presence of Heart Disense \((\mathrm{No}=0\), Yes \(=1)\). They found a correlation of \(0.089\) between the two variables, Comment on their conclusion that this shows that baldness is not a possible cause of heart disease.

Association. Suppose you were to collect data for each pair of variables. You want to make a scatterplot. Which variable would you use as the explanatory variable and which as the response variable? Why? What would you expect to see in the scatterplot? Discuss the likely direction, form, and strength. a) T-shirts at a store: price each, number sold b) Scuba diving: depth, water pressure c) Scuba diving: depth, visibility d) All elementary school students: weight, score on a reading test

Correlation conclusions I. The correlation between Age and Income as measured on 100 people is \(r=0.75 .\) Explain whether or not each of these possible conclusions is justified: a) When Age increases, Income increases as well. b) The form of the relationship between Age and Income is straight. c) There are no outliers in the scatterplot of Income vs. Age. d) Whether we measure Age in years or months, the correlation will still be \(0.75\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free