Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Association. A researcher investigating the association between two variables collected some data and was surprised when he calculated the correlation. He had expected to find a fairly strong association, yet the correlation was near 0 . Discouraged, he didn't bother making a scatterplot. Explain to him how the scatterplot could still reveal the strong association he anticipated.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A scatterplot might reveal a strong non-linear association, even if the correlation is near 0.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Correlation Coefficient

The correlation coefficient, denoted as \(r\), measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. A correlation near 0 indicates a very weak linear relationship, implying that the data points do not follow a linear trend.
02

Recognize Non-linear Associations

If the relationship between the two variables is non-linear (for example, quadratic, exponential, or another form of curve), the correlation coefficient might be near 0, even though there is a strong association of a non-linear nature.
03

Create the Scatterplot

Plot the data on a scatterplot to visually inspect the relationship between the variables. By doing this, you can directly observe patterns, clusters, or any type of non-linear relationship that won't be reflected by the correlation coefficient alone.
04

Analyze the Scatterplot

Look for shapes or trends in the data points on the scatterplot. For example, a parabolic shape (U or inverted U), exponential growth or decay, or any circular or spiral pattern could suggest a non-linear relationship not captured by the correlation coefficient.
05

Conclude with a Visual Analysis

Based on the scatterplot's visual representation, determine if there is indeed a strong association between the variables, just not in a linear form. This emphasizes why scatterplots are crucial for identifying relationships that the correlation coefficient may miss.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Non-linear relationships
Continuous data can often be complex and not follow a straight line. Non-linear relationships occur when two variables are related, but their relationship doesn't create a straight line when graphed. This could be a curve, like a parabola or an exponential growth pattern. These types of relationships are not appropriately measured by the correlation coefficient, which only assesses linear connections.
A common example of a non-linear relationship is a quadratic relationship, where one variable might increase as another increases, but only up to a point, after which it decreases,— creating an inverted U-shape. Recognizing the specifics of these associations can help in understanding the real dynamics underlying the datasets.
Scatterplot analysis
A scatterplot is a type of graph used to visually represent the relationship between two variables. Each point on the graph corresponds to one observation (or data point) comprising a pair of numbers.
By examining the distribution and arrangement of these points, patterns such as clusters or outliers can be distinguished. This visual representation can uncover trends and relationships, whether they are linear or non-linear.
Creating a scatterplot is an essential step in data analysis because it provides a visual understanding that numerical statistics, such as the correlation coefficient, may not reveal. Being a simple yet powerful tool, it allows researchers to observe directly the nature of the relationships within their data, making it clear if relationships are present—even in non-linear forms.
Correlation coefficient
The correlation coefficient, denoted by 'r', is a numerical measure that assesses the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. It ranges between -1 and 1.
  • If 'r' is close to 1, it indicates a strong positive linear relationship.
  • If 'r' is close to -1, it suggests a strong negative linear relationship.
  • A value near 0 implies little to no linear relationship.
However, this measure has its limitations. When the underlying relationship is non-linear, the correlation coefficient can be very close to zero—even when a strong association exists.
Understanding the limitation of 'r' is crucial, as it reaffirms the importance of using additional analysis methods, such as scatterplot inspections, to fully comprehend data relationships.
Linear vs non-linear associations
It's important to distinguish between linear and non-linear associations when studying relationships between variables. Linear associations involve a straight-line relationship where changes in one variable predict changes in another at a constant rate. These associations are easily captured by the correlation coefficient.
Non-linear associations, on the other hand, entail relationships that are not constant—they could involve curvature, peaks, or troughs. Because these patterns deviate from a straight-line form, the correlation coefficient might fail to capture the essence of these associations. This is why non-linear associations can appear inconsequential if the analysis relies solely on a correlation coefficient, emphasizing the necessity for visual tools like scatterplots to explore the true nature of the connections. Understanding both types helps provide a comprehensive picture and avoid misinterpretations in data analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Correlation errors. Your Economics instructor assigns your class to investigate factors associated with the gross domestic product (GDP) of nations. Each student examines a different factor (such as Life Expectancy, Literacy Rate, etc.) for a few countries and reports to the class. Apparently, some of your classmates do not understand Statistics very well because you know several of their conclusions are incorrect. Explain the mistakes in their statements below. a) "My very low correlation of \(-0.772\) shows that there is almost no association between \(G D P\) and Infant Mortality Rate." b) "There was a correlation of \(0.44\) between \(G D P\) and Continent."

Height and reading. A researcher studies children in elementary school and finds a strong positive linear association between height and reading scores. a) Does this mean that taller children are generally better readers? b) What might explain the strong correlation?

Income and housing. The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (www.ofheo.gov) collects data on various aspects of housing costs around the United States. Here is a scatterplot of the Housing Cost Index versus the Median Family Income for each of the 50 states. The correlation is \(0.65\). a) Describe the relationship between the Housing Cost Index and the Median Family Income by state. b) If we standardized both variables, what would the correlation coefficient between the standardized variables be? c) If we had measured Median Family Income in thousands of dollars instead of dollars, how would the correlation change? d) Washington, DC, has a Housing Cost Index of 548 and a median income of about \(\$ 45,000\). If we were to include DC in the data set, how would that affect the correlation coefficient? e) Do these data provide proof that by raising the median income in a state, the Housing Cost Index will rise as a result? Explain.

Cellular telephones and life expectancy. A survey of the world's nations in 2004 shows a strong positive correlation between percentage of the country using cell phones and life expectancy in years at birth. a) Does this mean that cell phones are good for your health? b) What might explain the strong correlation?

Association. Suppose you were to collect data for each pair of variables. You want to make a scatterplot. Which variable would you use as the explanatory variable and which as the response variable? Why? What would you expect to see in the scatterplot? Discuss the likely direction, form, and strength. a) Long-distance calls: time (minutes), cost b) Lightning strikes: distance from lightning, time delay of the thunder c) A streetlight: its apparent brightness, your distance from it d) Cars: weight of car, age of owner

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free