Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Car thefts. The National Insurance Crime Bureau reports that Honda Accords, Honda Civics, and Toyota Camrys are the cars most frequently reported stolen, while Ford Tauruses, Pontiac Vibes, and Buick LeSabres are stolen least often. Is it reasonable to say that there's a correlation between the type of car you own and the risk that it will be stolen?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, there is a correlation between car type and theft risk, as certain types are stolen more frequently.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Definition of Correlation

Correlation refers to a statistical relationship, be it positive or negative, between two variables. Here, we are considering a possible relationship between the type of car and the likelihood of it being stolen.
02

Identify the Variables

In this context, the variables involved are the 'type of car' and the 'risk of theft.' The type of car is categorical, while the risk of theft is quantitative, expressed as the frequency of reported thefts.
03

Examine the Data Provided

The problem states that certain models (Honda Accords, Honda Civics, and Toyota Camrys) are most frequently stolen, whereas others (Ford Tauruses, Pontiac Vibes, and Buick LeSabres) are the least frequently stolen. This contrast suggests some cars face higher theft risk than others.
04

Assess the Presence of a Correlation

Based on the information provided, there appears to be a relationship between the type of car and the risk of theft. Some car types face a higher risk of being stolen while others face a lower risk. Such a pattern suggests a correlation between these variables.
05

Consider Potential Confounding Factors

Though there seems to be a correlation, it’s important to consider that other factors (such as car popularity, availability, or other characteristics) might also influence theft rates, which are not detailed here.
06

Conclusion: Evaluate Reasonableness of Correlation

Given the data, it is reasonable to suggest that there exists a correlation between the type of car and the risk of it being stolen based on observed trends. However, determining causation or deeper insights would require more detailed data analysis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Categorical Variables
When discussing the type of car you own, we refer to what is known as a categorical variable. Categorical variables classify data into distinct groups or categories. In the context of car thefts, each car model represents a unique category.
For example:
  • Honda Accord
  • Honda Civic
  • Toyota Camry
  • Ford Taurus
  • Pontiac Vibe
  • Buick LeSabre
These categories or groups help analyze and understand different data points based on the type or category they belong to. While categorical variables do not provide numerical data, their descriptive nature is essential in identifying trends or relationships, such as which car types are more prone to theft.
Quantitative Analysis
Quantitative analysis involves examining numerical data to uncover patterns and insights. In the car theft scenario, the 'risk of theft' is a quantitative measure.
The risk is often calculated as the frequency or rate of thefts for each car type. You can think of it as:
  • "How often is a Honda Accord reported stolen?"
  • "What's the theft rate for a Toyota Camry compared to a Ford Taurus?"
Quantitative analysis allows us to apply statistical methods to these frequencies to determine if there are significant differences among the car types. These numbers help provide a clearer picture of how likely different vehicles are to be stolen.
Confounding Factors
Confounding factors are variables that may affect the observed relationship between two studied variables. In the context of car thefts, while there might seem to be a correlation between the type of car and its theft risk, other factors could be influencing this relationship.
Potential confounding factors include:
  • Popularity of the car model
  • Geographical location where the car is parked
  • Lack of anti-theft deterrents
  • Socioeconomic factors of the area
These factors might increase or decrease theft risks independently of the car model itself. Identifying and accounting for confounders helps ensure that we do not mistakenly attribute the cause of theft solely to the type of car, leading to more accurate analysis.
Statistical Relationship
A statistical relationship, like correlation, refers to a measure that quantifies the association between two variables. In the realm of car thefts, it explores whether and how much the type of car is associated with theft risk.
Correlations can be:
  • Positive: As one variable increases, so does the other (e.g., more Honda Accords, more theft reports).
  • Negative: As one variable increases, the other decreases (e.g., more anti-theft features, fewer theft reports).
It is crucial to remember that correlation does not equate to causation. Just because two variables show a statistical relationship, it does not mean one causes the other. Understanding the difference is vital, especially in broader data-driven analyses, like determining theft risks.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Prediction units. The errors in predicting hurricane tracks (examined in this chapter) were given in nautical miles. An ordinary mile is \(0.86898\) nautical miles. Most people living on the Gulf Coast of the United States would prefer to know the prediction errors in miles rather than nautical miles. Explain why converting the errors to miles would not change the correlation between Prediction Error and Year.

Sample survey. A polling organization is checking its database to see if the two data sources it used sampled the same zip codes. The variable Datasource \(=1\) if the data source is MetroMedia, 2 if the data source is DataQwest, and 3 if it's RollingPoll. The organization finds that the correlation between five-digit zip code and Datasource is \(-0.0229\). It concludes that the correlation is low enough to state that there is no dependency between Zip Code and Source of Data. Comment.

Association. Suppose you were to collect data for each pair of variables. You want to make a scatterplot. Which variable would you use as the explanatory variable and which as the response variable? Why? What would you expect to see in the scatterplot? Discuss the likely direction, form, and strength. a) Long-distance calls: time (minutes), cost b) Lightning strikes: distance from lightning, time delay of the thunder c) A streetlight: its apparent brightness, your distance from it d) Cars: weight of car, age of owner

Correlation errors. Your Economics instructor assigns your class to investigate factors associated with the gross domestic product (GDP) of nations. Each student examines a different factor (such as Life Expectancy, Literacy Rate, etc.) for a few countries and reports to the class. Apparently, some of your classmates do not understand Statistics very well because you know several of their conclusions are incorrect. Explain the mistakes in their statements below. a) "My very low correlation of \(-0.772\) shows that there is almost no association between \(G D P\) and Infant Mortality Rate." b) "There was a correlation of \(0.44\) between \(G D P\) and Continent."

Attendance 2006. American League baseball games are played under the designated hitter rule, meaning that pitchers, often weak hitters, do not come to bat. Baseball owners believe that the designated hitter rule means more runs scored, which in turn means higher attendance. Is there evidence that more fans attend games if the teams score more runs? Data collected from American League games during the 2006 season indicate a correlation of \(0.667\) between runs scored and the number of people at the game. (http: //mlb.mlb.com) a) Does the scatterplot indicate that it's appropriate to calculate a correlation? Explain. b) Describe the association between attendance and runs scored. c) Does this association prove that the owners are right that more fans will come to games if the teams score more runs?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free