Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A casino claims that its roulette wheel is truly random. What should that claim mean?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A truly random roulette wheel means each outcome is equally likely with no biases; each spin is independent and tested for randomness.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Randomness

In the context of a casino's roulette, claiming that the wheel is truly random means that each outcome on a roulette spin (each number or color) is equally likely. For example, if there are 38 possible outcomes on an American roulette wheel (numbers 1-36, 0, and 00), each number should have a 1/38 chance of being the winning number on any given spin.
02

Analyzing No Bias

Since the casino claims the wheel is random, this implies that there is no physical or mechanical bias in the roulette system. Each outcome is not influenced by where the ball is spun from, the force exerted, or any imperfections in the wheel's construction.
03

Equally Likely Outcomes

For the outcome to be truly random, the probability of the ball landing on any one of the numbers must be the same for each number. This means if you were to spin the wheel many times, over a large number of spins, each number would appear approximately the same number of times.
04

Consideration of Independent Events

An essential part of this claim is that each spin is independent of others. The outcome of one spin does not affect the outcome of another. This ensures past spins cannot predict future results, which is a hallmark of a random process.
05

Statistical Testing for Randomness

To confirm true randomness, statistical tests like chi-square tests can be performed. These tests compare observed results against expected outcomes under true randomness to determine if any observed deviations are due to chance or indicate a systemic bias.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Randomness
In the realm of probability, randomness is a fundamental concept, often thought of as the lack of predictability in events. When a system is truly random, each possible outcome has an equal probability of occurring. This is what casinos refer to when they claim that a roulette wheel is truly random. Each number should have an equal chance of appearing, regardless of past outcomes.
  • For an American roulette wheel, which has 38 possible numbers (1-36, 0, and 00), each number should ideally have a probability of \(\frac{1}{38}\).
  • The absence of patterns or biases is what generally defines randomness.
This characteristic ensures fairness in games where players expect outcomes that do not favor the house unfairly through mechanical biases or design flaws. Without randomness, players could exploit patterns, thereby undermining the casino's integrity.
Statistical Testing
Statistical testing is a powerful tool used to verify the claims of randomness. When a casino claims their roulette wheel is truly random, tests such as the chi-square test can be employed to assess this claim. The chi-square test helps determine whether the observed outcomes differ significantly from the expected outcomes. To perform such a test, you would:
  • Gather a substantial amount of data from roulette spins.
  • Determine the expected frequency of each outcome if the wheel were truly random.
  • Compare this against the actual observed frequency using the chi-square formula.
If the result of the statistical test does not show significant deviation from expected values, the randomness claim holds credibility. If the outcome differs significantly, it might indicate a problem, such as a bias or malfunction in the roulette wheel.
Independent Events
A critical component of randomness is the concept of independent events. In a truly random system like a fair roulette, the outcome of one spin is completely independent of any other. Essentially, past spins have no bearing on future spins. Examples of Independent Events:
  • Rolling a fair die multiple times.
  • Flipping a coin.
  • Drawing cards from a shuffled deck, when properly replaced.
In roulette, if each spin is an independent event, then regardless of whether the ball landed on red or black, the next spin's outcome should still be completely random. This means you cannot use past outcomes to predict future ones, ensuring fairness in the game's long run. Independence is what underpins the equality of opportunity for any number to appear, thereby supporting the claim of a truly random wheel.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

According to Pew Research, the contact rate (probability of contacting a selected household) was \(69 \%\) in 1997 and \(76 \%\) in 2003 . However, the cooperation rate (probability of someone at the contacted household agreeing to be interviewed) was \(58 \%\) in 1997 and dropped to \(38 \%\) in 2003 . a) What is the probability (in 2003) of obtaining an interview with the next household on the sample list? (To obtain an interview, an interviewer must both contact the household and then get agreement for the interview.) b) Was it more likely to obtain an interview from a randomly selected household in 1997 or in \(2003 ?\)

You roll a fair die three times. What is the probability that a) you roll all 6 's? b) you roll all odd numbers? c) none of your rolls gets a number divisible by 3 ? d) you roll at least one 5 ? e) the numbers you roll are not all \(5^{\prime}\) s?

For high school students graduating in 2007 , college admissions to the nation's most selective schools were the most competitive in memory. (The New York Times, "A Great Year for Ivy League Schools, but Not So Good for Applicants to Them," April 4,2007 ). Harvard accepted about \(9 \%\) of its applicants, Stanford \(10 \%\), and Penn \(16 \%\). Jorge has applied to all three. Assuming that he's a typical applicant, he figures that his chances of getting into both Harvard and Stanford must be about \(0.9 \%\). a) How has he arrived at this conclusion? b) What additional assumption is he making? c) Do you agree with his conclusion?

Suppose that \(46 \%\) of families living in a certain county own a car and \(18 \%\) own an SUV. The Addition Rule might suggest, then, that \(64 \%\) of families own either a car or an SUV. What's wrong with that reasoning?

A slot machine has three wheels that spin independently. Each has 10 equally likely symbols: 4 bars, 3 lemons, 2 cherries, and a bell. If you play, what is the probability that a) you get 3 lemons? b) you get no fruit symbols? c) you get 3 bells (the jackpot)? d) you get no bells?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free