Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Funding for many schools comes from taxes based on assessed values of local properties. People's homes are assessed higher if they have extra features such as garages and swimming pools. Assessment records in a certain school district indicate that \(37 \%\) of the homes have garages and \(3 \%\) have swimming pools. The Addition Rule might suggest, then, that \(40 \%\) of residences have a garage or a pool. What's wrong with that reasoning?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The reasoning is flawed because it ignores potential overlap between homes with both features, leading to an overestimate.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Addition Rule

The Addition Rule in probability states that for any two events A and B, the probability of either event occurring (A or B) is given by \( P(A\cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A\cap B) \). This means we add the probabilities of each event occurring but subtract the probability of both events occurring together.
02

Define Events and Probabilities

Consider the two events: Event G for homes having garages and Event P for homes having swimming pools. We are given: \( P(G) = 0.37 \) and \( P(P) = 0.03 \). The simple addition of these probabilities is based on the assumption they are mutually exclusive, which may not hold true.
03

Apply the Addition Rule Correctly

To accurately apply the Addition Rule, we should also consider \( P(G\cap P) \), the probability of homes having both a garage and a swimming pool. Without this probability, simply adding \(0.37\) and \(0.03\) ignores any overlap where homes may have both features.
04

Identify the Error in Reasoning

The error occurs because the initial calculation assumes there's no overlap between homes with garages and homes with swimming pools (i.e., \( P(G\cap P) = 0 \)). The Calculation of \( P(G\cup P) = 0.37 + 0.03 = 0.40 \) is incorrect unless \( P(G\cap P) = 0 \), which may not be true. If some homes have both garages and pools, then \( P(G\cap P) > 0 \), and we have overestimated the percentage with the union calculation.
05

Conclusion of the Error

The reasoning is incorrect because it fails to account for the possible existence of homes with both garages and swimming pools. Without data on \( P(G\cap P) \), the assumption that the two events are mutually exclusive leads to an overestimate of \( P(G\cup P) \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Addition Rule
The Addition Rule is a fundamental principle in probability that helps us determine the probability of either one or both of two events occurring. This rule assists in estimating combined outcomes in scenarios where two distinct events might happen simultaneously. In mathematical terms, the Addition Rule is expressed as:
\[ P(A\cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A\cap B) \] Where
  • \(P(A)\) is the probability of event A occurring,
  • \(P(B)\) is the probability of event B occurring, and
  • \(P(A \cap B)\) is the probability of both events A and B occurring concurrently.
This equation shows that to find the probability of either event A or event B happening, you start by summing the individual probabilities of each event. However, if there's a chance that both could occur simultaneously, you must subtract the probability of both happening to avoid double counting. This adjustment is crucial because the overlap in occurrences is counted twice if we simply sum \(P(A)\) and \(P(B)\) without modification.
Mutually Exclusive Events
In probability, Mutually Exclusive Events are scenarios where two events cannot occur simultaneously. If we have such events, their probability appears straightforward at first glance because there's no overlap to consider. For example, if an event could be either rolling a 3 or a 5 on a standard dice, they are mutually exclusive - the dice cannot show both 3 and 5 at the same time.
This simplicity translates to the equation \[ P(A\cap B) = 0 \] when A and B are mutually exclusive. Here,
  • \(P(A\cap B)\) represents the probability of both events happening together, and
  • \(0\) denotes that there is no overlap.
However, the error in assuming events are mutually exclusive without verification can lead to inaccurate probability calculations. Analyzing whether events are truly mutually exclusive is key. If they are not, and we presume they are, calculations that seem correct, like simply adding probabilities, might be flawed.
Overlap in Probability
The concept of Overlap in Probability refers to instances where two events can occur at the same time. This intersection, known in probability as the "joint probability", needs careful consideration. When events overlap, it affects how we calculate the likelihood of either event happening.
The probability of the overlap, \(P(A \cap B)\), is critical to the accuracy of our final probability calculation.
  • Without it, assumptions might exclude shared outcomes, leading to overestimation.
  • The crux of accurate probability assessment relies on acknowledging and adjusting for this overlap.
In our school funding example, ignoring the possibility that some homes have both garages and swimming pools misrepresents the true scenario. By identifying that there might indeed be an overlap, we can refine our calculations using the Addition Rule effectively, accounting for homes counted twice by mistake if not adjusted for joint occurrences. Always remember: proper probability calculations involve including overlaps where they exist - never assume they do not unless otherwise indicated.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

On September 11,2002, the first anniversary of the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, the New York State Lottery's daily number came up \(9-1-1 .\) An interesting coincidence or a cosmic sign? a) What is the probability that the winning three numbers match the date on any given day? b) What is the probability that a whole year passes without this happening? c) What is the probability that the date and winning lottery number match at least once during any year? d) If every one of the 50 states has a three-digit lottery, what is the probability that at least one of them will come up \(9-1-1\) on September \(11 ?\)

The weather reporter on TV makes predictions such as a \(25 \%\) chance of rain. What do you think is the meaning of such a phrase?

As mentioned in the chapter, opinion-polling organizations contact their respondents by sampling random telephone numbers. Although interviewers now can reach about \(76 \%\) of U.S. households, the percentage of those contacted who agree to cooperate with the survey has fallen from \(58 \%\) in 1997 to only \(38 \%\) in 2003 (Pew Research Center for the People and the Press). Each household, of course, is independent of the others. a) What is the probability that the next household on the list will be contacted but will refuse to cooperate? b) What is the probability (in 2003 ) of failing to contact a household or of contacting the household but not getting them to agree to the interview? c) Show another way to calculate the probability in part b.

Champion bowler. A certain bowler can bowl a strike \(70 \%\) of the time. What's the probability that she a) goes three consecutive frames without a strike? b) makes her first strike in the third frame? c) has at least one strike in the first three frames? d) bowls a perfect game (12 consecutive strikes)?

Although it's hard to be definitive in classifying people as right- or left- handed, some studies suggest that about \(14 \%\) of people are left-handed. Since \(0.14 \times 0.14=0.0196\), the Multiplication Rule might suggest that there's about a \(2 \%\) chance that a brother and a sister are both lefties. What's wrong with that reasoning?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free