Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (Aug. 2001) suggests that it's dangerous to enter a hospital on a weekend. During a 10 -year period, researchers tracked over 4 million emergency admissions to hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Their findings revealed that patients admitted on weekends had a much higher risk of death than those who went on weekdays. a) The researchers said the difference in death rates was "statistically significant." Explain in this context what that means. b) What kind of study was this? Explain. c) If you think you're quite ill on a Saturday, should you wait until Monday to seek medical help? Explain. d) Suggest some possible explanations for this troubling finding.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Weekend admissions are riskier due to staff and service constraints; don't delay critical care.

Step by step solution

01

Define Statistically Significant

In this context, "statistically significant" means that the difference in death rates between patients admitted on weekends and those admitted on weekdays is not likely due to random chance. It suggests that the research findings are robust and the observed difference in death rates is a genuine finding rather than a result of random variability in the data.
02

Identify the Study Type

This study is an observational cohort study. Researchers tracked patients who were admitted to hospitals over a 10-year period without influencing treatment or admissions, observing outcomes based on whether they were admitted on weekends or weekdays.
03

Decide When to Seek Help

Even if you are quite ill on a Saturday, you should not wait until Monday to seek medical help. Immediate medical attention can be critical, and waiting could worsen your condition regardless of the day.
04

Speculate on Explanations

Possible explanations for this finding could include reduced hospital staff on weekends, leading to less immediate care, fewer specialized services or consultants available, or delays in diagnostic procedures.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Observational Study
An observational study is a research method used to gather data without interfering with the subjects or variables involved. In such studies, researchers simply observe and record data in their natural settings. They do not manipulate any factors or assign treatments as they do in experimental studies. This approach is often used when it would be unethical or impractical to control variables. For example, in the study about emergency admissions in Ontario, researchers collected data on hospital admissions and outcomes over a 10-year period. They observed the differences in patient outcomes based on admission days without trying to influence those outcomes. In this way, they ensured the natural progression of events was maintained, making their findings broadly applicable. Key points of observational studies:
  • No manipulation of variables or interventions by researchers
  • Data is collected in real-world settings
  • Often used where experimental studies are not feasible or ethical
With observational studies, researchers can uncover associations and trends in large populations, like the increased risk associated with weekend hospital admissions.
Cohort Study
A cohort study is a specific type of observational study that focuses on groups of individuals, known as cohorts. In these studies, researchers observe participants who share common characteristics or experiences over a period of time. In the context of the emergency admissions study, a cohort consisted of patients admitted to hospitals. Researchers followed these cohorts based on the time of their admission—weekdays or weekends—and measured outcomes, such as mortality rates. Cohort studies are beneficial because they track changes and developments in the health outcomes of the group over time. Important features of cohort studies include:
  • Following individuals over time to assess outcomes
  • Observing groups with specific shared characteristics
  • Potential to study multiple outcomes within the same cohort
This study design helps in understanding the long-term effects of exposures or experiences, such as the potential risks associated with weekend hospital admissions.
Emergency Admissions
Emergency admissions to hospitals occur when patients arrive unexpectedly, often due to sudden and severe health issues. These cases require immediate attention and care. During emergencies, the primary focus is on stabilizing the patient and preventing further complications. The study in question examined over 4 million emergency admissions across a decade. It analyzed the timing of these admissions and the related outcomes. Understanding emergency admissions helps highlight the demands placed on healthcare systems, especially under varying conditions like weekdays versus weekends. Points to understand about emergency admissions:
  • Unplanned entries to medical facilities
  • Critical decisions and interventions are often required quickly
  • Can strain healthcare resources, impacting quality of care
The study aimed to reveal insights into how the timing of these admissions (weekend vs. weekday) might influence patient outcomes, guiding improvements in healthcare delivery.
Weekend Effect
The 'weekend effect' refers to the observed phenomenon where patients admitted to hospitals over the weekends experience worse outcomes compared to those admitted during weekdays. This may include higher mortality rates, as highlighted in the Ontario study. Researchers aim to understand why such discrepancies exist. Potential reasons for the weekend effect might include:
  • Fewer staff available during weekends
  • Limited availability of specialized services or interventions
  • Delays in diagnostic procedures or treatments
Investigating the weekend effect is crucial for improving healthcare policy and hospital staffing models. It prompts healthcare providers to ensure that critical medical services remain consistent, regardless of the day, to prevent adverse effects on patient care.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A humor piece published in the British Medical Journal ("Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomized control trials," Gordon, Smith, and Pell, \(B M J, 2003: 327\) ) notes that we can't tell for sure whether parachutes are safe and effective because there has never been a properly randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled study of parachute effectiveness in skydiving. (Yes, this is the sort of thing statisticians find funny \(\ldots\).) Suppose you were designing such a study: a) What is the factor in this experiment? b) What experimental units would you propose? c) What would serve as a placebo for this study? d) What would the treatments be? e) What would the response variable be? f) What sources of variability would you control? g) How would you randomize this "experiment"? h) How would you make the experiment double-blind?

A medical researcher suspects that giving post-surgical patients large doses of vitamin \(\mathrm{E}\) will speed their recovery times by helping their incisions heal more quickly. Design an experiment to test this conjecture. Be sure to identify the factors, levels, treatments, response variable, and the role of randomization.

Describe a strategy to randomly split the 24 tomato plants into the three groups for the chapter's completely randomized single factor test of OptiGro fertilizer.

describes an experiment that showed that high doses of omega-3 fats might be of benefit to people with bipolar disorder. The experiment involved a control group of subjects who received a placebo. Why didn't the experimenters just give everyone the omega-3 fats to see if they improved?

Some schools teach reading using phonics (the sounds made by letters) and others using whole language (word recognition). Suppose a school district wants to know which method works better. Suggest a design for an appropriate experiment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free