Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A medical researcher suspects that giving post-surgical patients large doses of vitamin \(\mathrm{E}\) will speed their recovery times by helping their incisions heal more quickly. Design an experiment to test this conjecture. Be sure to identify the factors, levels, treatments, response variable, and the role of randomization.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Design an experiment with three vitamin E dose levels, assign patients randomly, and compare recovery times.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Hypothesis

Identify the hypothesis we want to test. Here, the hypothesis is that large doses of vitamin E will reduce recovery times after surgery.
02

Identify the Factors

Determine the factors that may affect the outcome of the experiment. In this case, the primary factor is the dosage of vitamin E given to the patients.
03

Set Factor Levels

Specify different levels for the factors. For vitamin E dosage, you might use three levels: no vitamin E (control), a moderate dose of vitamin E, and a high dose of vitamin E.
04

Define the Treatments

Each combination of factor levels constitutes a treatment. Here, there will be three treatments: no vitamin E, moderate vitamin E dose, and high vitamin E dose.
05

Determine the Response Variable

Decide what will be measured to evaluate the effect. In this case, the response variable is the recovery time after surgery, particularly the time taken for incisions to heal.
06

Plan for Randomization

Use randomization to assign patients to different treatment groups. This process minimizes bias and ensures that other, uncontrolled variables don't systematically affect the results.
07

Conduct the Experiment

Administer the treatments to the randomly assigned patients and monitor their recovery times meticulously, ensuring equal conditions for all treatment groups except for the treatment factor itself.
08

Analyze the Results

After collecting the data, use statistical analysis to compare the recovery times across the different treatment groups. Look for significant differences that would support or refute the hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental aspect of experimental design. It revolves around putting a theory to trial and evaluating evidence to make a decision. In our context with vitamin E and post-surgical healing, the hypothesis being tested is whether large doses of vitamin E can reduce recovery times. This is essentially framed as our **alternative hypothesis**. The **null hypothesis**, on the other hand, is that the vitamin E does not have an effect on recovery times.

Steps in hypothesis testing include setting these hypotheses, selecting a significance level (often 0.05), and using statistical methods to determine if the data significantly supports the alternative hypothesis. This will help in making an informed conclusion about the impact of vitamin E.
Randomization
Randomization is a cornerstone method in experimental design and helps ensure reliability and validity. By randomly assigning patients to different treatment groups, potential biases and confounding variables are minimized.

The beauty of randomization lies in its ability to evenly distribute known and unknown factors across treatment groups. This lessens the risk of systematic differences that could skew the results. In the vitamin E study, for instance, randomization ensures that each group (no vitamin E, moderate dose, high dose) is similar in all respects, except the treatment itself.

This allows researchers to attribute differences in recovery times directly to the treatments, making the findings more robust.
Response Variable
A response variable is essentially what the experimenter measures to ascertain the effects of the treatment. It reflects the outcome or result of the experiment's action. In our vitamin E scenario, the response variable is the recovery time, specifically the healing time of surgical incisions.

Choosing the correct response variable is crucial, as it should directly relate to the purpose of the study or hypothesis. The measure needs to be clearly defined so that the results can be consistently recorded by different observers, adding to the credibility of the study. Using tools and methods that standardize these measurements is often a good practice in experimental design.
Treatment Levels
Treatment levels refer to the different conditions under which an experiment is conducted. They define how much of a factor is applied or introduced during the study.

In the case of vitamin E, three treatment levels are utilized: no vitamin E (serving as a control group), a moderate dose, and a high dose. These allow researchers to evaluate the impact of differing concentrations of vitamin E on recovery times.

By having several treatment levels, researchers can determine not only if vitamin E impacts healing, but also how different dosages compare to each other. This allows a nuanced understanding of the relationship between the treatment variable (vitamin E level) and the outcome (recovery time).

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When spending large amounts to purchase advertising time, companies want to know what audience they'll reach. In January \(2007, \mathrm{a}\) poll asked 1008 American adults whether they planned to watch the upcoming Super Bowl. Men and women were asked separately whether they were looking forward more to the football game or to watching the commercials. Among the men, \(16 \%\) were planning to watch and were looking forward primarily to the commercials. Among women, \(30 \%\) were looking forward primarily to the commercials. a) Was this a stratified sample or a blocked experiment? Explain. b) Was the design of the study appropriate for the advertisers' questions?

An experiment that showed that subjects fed the DASH diet were able to lower their blood pressure by an average of \(6.7\) points compared to a group fed a "control diet." All meals were prepared by dieticians. a) Why were the subjects randomly assigned to the diets instead of letting people pick what they wanted to eat? b) Why were the meals prepared by dieticians? c) Why did the researchers need the control group? If the DASH diet group's blood pressure was lower at the end of the experiment than at the beginning, wouldn't that prove the effectiveness of that diet? d) What additional information would you want to know in order to decide whether an average reduction in blood pressure of \(6.7\) points was statistically significant?

. It's a common belief that people behave strangely when there's a full moon and that as a result police and emergency rooms are busier than usual. Design a way you could find out whether there is any merit to this belief. Will you use an observational study or an experiment? Why?

A swimsuit manufacturer wants to test the speed of its newly designed suit. The company designs an experiment by having 6 randomly selected Olympic swimmers swim as fast as they can with their old swimsuit first and then swim the same event again with the new, expensive swimsuit. The company will use the difference in times as the response variable. Criticize the experiment and point out some of the problems with generalizing the results.

A running-shoe manufacturer wants to test the effect of its new sprinting shoe on 100 -meter dash times. The company sponsors 5 athletes who are running the 100 -meter dash in the 2004 Summer Olympic games. To test the shoe, it has all 5 runners run the 100 -meter dash with a competitor's shoe and then again with their new shoe. The company uses the difference in times as the response variable. a) Suggest some improvements to the design. b) Why might the shoe manufacturer not be able to generalize the results they find to all runners?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free