Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease that strikes more often the farther people live from the equator. Could vitamin D-which most people get from the sun's ultraviolet rays - be a factor? Researchers compared vitamin D levels in blood samples from 150 U.S. military personnel who have developed MS with blood samples of nearly 300 who have not. The samples were taken, on average, five years before the disease was diagnosed. Those with the highest blood vitamin D levels had a \(62 \%\) lower risk of MS than those with the lowest levels. (The link was only in whites, not in blacks or Hispanics.) a) What kind of study was this? b) Is that an appropriate choice for investigating this problem? Explain. c) Who were the subjects? d) What were the variables?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) Observational study; b) Yes, due to ethical/practical constraints; c) U.S. military personnel; d) Vitamin D levels and MS diagnosis.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Type of Study

The researchers compared two groups based on their existing differences in vitamin D levels to understand its effect on MS development. This approach suggests the study type is observational, as no variables were manipulated.
02

Evaluate the Study's Appropriateness

An observational study is appropriate when ethical or practical constraints prevent random assignment or intervention, such as in cases where altering vitamin D levels actively through supplementation might not be feasible or ethical.
03

Identify Subjects

The study's subjects were U.S. military personnel, specifically comparing 150 individuals diagnosed with MS to nearly 300 individuals who were not diagnosed with the disease.
04

Determine Variables

Two key variables are present: the independent variable is the vitamin D levels in the blood samples, and the dependent variable is the occurrence of MS diagnosis among the subjects.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Vitamin D
Vitamin D is an essential nutrient that plays a critical role in maintaining overall health. This vitamin is unique because our bodies naturally produce it when our skin is exposed to sunlight.
People also obtain Vitamin D from certain foods like fatty fish, fortified dairy products, and supplements.
It aids in calcium absorption, promoting bone health, and has been linked to improved immune function.
  • Production and Sources: Most Vitamin D is synthesized in the skin upon exposure to the sun's ultraviolet rays, making it vital for those with limited sun exposure to consider diet and supplements.
  • Health Benefits: Beyond supporting bone health, Vitamin D has been linked to mood regulation and may play a role in preventing chronic diseases through its influence on immune function.
  • Deficiency and Risks: Low Vitamin D levels can lead to bone disorders like rickets in children or osteoporosis in adults. Emerging research indicates potential associations with multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune diseases.
In relation to multiple sclerosis (MS), studies, like the one discussed in the exercise, have observed correlations between higher levels of Vitamin D and a decreased risk of developing MS. Although more research is needed to fully understand this relationship, it highlights the importance of maintaining adequate Vitamin D levels for individuals at risk.
Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a complex and chronic autoimmune disease. It affects the central nervous system, primarily targeting the brain and spinal cord.
In MS, the immune system mistakenly attacks the protective covering of nerves, known as myelin, disrupting communication between the brain and the rest of the body.
  • Symptoms and Effects: Symptoms of MS vary widely among individuals and can include fatigue, mobility issues, and cognitive challenges. The severity and progression of the disease often differ, with some experiencing mild symptoms while others face significant disability over time.
  • Risk Factors: Geographic location is noted as a risk factor, with higher prevalence in regions farther from the equator. This geographical aspect points towards environmental influences like limited sunlight and Vitamin D production.
  • Treatment and Management: While there is currently no cure for MS, treatments focus on managing symptoms, reducing relapses, and slowing disease progression.
By exploring possible links between Vitamin D levels and MS risk, researchers aim to uncover potential prevention strategies or supporting treatments. This research underscores the need for further investigation into environmental and lifestyle factors contributing to MS.
Variables in Research
In research, variables are elements or factors that researchers manipulate, measure, or utilize to gather information. Understanding these variables is vital to interpreting study results correctly.
They can be categorized mainly as independent or dependent variables.
  • Independent Variable: This is the variable that researchers believe may influence changes in the study. In our exercise, Vitamin D levels serve as the independent variable, posited to affect the likelihood of developing MS.
  • Dependent Variable: This variable reflects the outcomes or changes observed in response to the independent variable. In this study, whether an individual developed MS was the dependent variable.
  • Control and Confounding Variables: Researchers need to consider other potential factors that could affect results, such as genetics, lifestyle, or environmental factors, to ensure the study's validity.
By recognizing the types of variables involved and their roles, researchers can structure studies effectively and draw meaningful conclusions. In observational studies, while direct manipulation of variables is absent, analyzing these variables aids in identifying natural correlations or associations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A 2001 Danish study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine casts significant doubt on suggestions that adults who drink wine have higher levels of "good" cholesterol and fewer heart attacks. These researchers followed a group of individuals born at a Copenhagen hospital between 1959 and 1961 for 40 years. Their study found that in this group the adults who drank wine were richer and better educated than those who did not. a) What kind of study was this? b) It is generally true that people with high levels of education and high socioeconomic status are healthier than others. How does this call into question the supposed health benefits of wine? c) Can studies such as these prove causation (that wine helps prevent heart attacks, that drinking wine makes one richer, that being rich helps prevent heart attacks, etc.)? Explain.

A running-shoe manufacturer wants to test the effect of its new sprinting shoe on 100 -meter dash times. The company sponsors 5 athletes who are running the 100 -meter dash in the 2004 Summer Olympic games. To test the shoe, it has all 5 runners run the 100 -meter dash with a competitor's shoe and then again with their new shoe. The company uses the difference in times as the response variable. a) Suggest some improvements to the design. b) Why might the shoe manufacturer not be able to generalize the results they find to all runners?

A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (Aug. 2001) suggests that it's dangerous to enter a hospital on a weekend. During a 10 -year period, researchers tracked over 4 million emergency admissions to hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Their findings revealed that patients admitted on weekends had a much higher risk of death than those who went on weekdays. a) The researchers said the difference in death rates was "statistically significant." Explain in this context what that means. b) What kind of study was this? Explain. c) If you think you're quite ill on a Saturday, should you wait until Monday to seek medical help? Explain. d) Suggest some possible explanations for this troubling finding.

Researchers studied the herb black cohosh as a treatment for hot flashes caused by menopause. They randomly assigned 351 women aged 45 to 55 who reported at least two hot flashes a day to one of five groups: (1) black cohosh, (2) a multiherb supplement with black cohosh, (3) the multiherb supplement plus advice to consume more soy foods, (4) estrogen replacement therapy, or (5) receive a placebo. After a year, only the women given estrogen replacement therapy had symptoms different from those of the placebo group. [Annals of Internal Medicine \(145: 12,869-897]\) a) What kind of study was this? b) Is that an appropriate choice for this problem? c) Who were the subjects? d) Identify the treatment and response variables.

. It's a common belief that people behave strangely when there's a full moon and that as a result police and emergency rooms are busier than usual. Design a way you could find out whether there is any merit to this belief. Will you use an observational study or an experiment? Why?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free