Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Exercise 10 describes an experiment showing that exercise helped people sleep better. The experiment involved other groups of subjects who didn't exercise. Why didn't the experimenters just have everyone exercise and see if their ability to sleep improved?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Control and variable comparison are necessary to determine if exercise affects sleep.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Purpose of a Control Group

In scientific experiments, a control group is essential to determine the effect of the variable being tested—in this case, exercise. If everyone in the study exercised, there would be no baseline to compare the results of the sleeping patterns. This control group, which does not exercise, helps identify whether the changes in sleep patterns can be attributed specifically to exercise rather than other factors.
02

Importance of Variable Comparison

By having some participants exercise and others not, the researchers can compare the results between the two groups. This comparison allows them to isolate the effect of exercise on sleep quality. If only the experiment group improved in sleep patterns, researchers have stronger evidence that exercise is the cause.
03

Avoid Confounding Variables

In experiments, it's important to minimize confounding variables—factors other than the independent variable (exercise) that might influence the outcome (sleep quality). Having a non-exercising group helps control for those variables, providing clearer insight into cause-and-effect relationships.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scientific Experiment
In a scientific experiment, researchers aim to discover the effects of a particular variable on a specific outcome. They achieve this through structured and controlled testing. When scientists design an experiment, they set up conditions to thoroughly investigate how a variable influences the results they are studying.
This process often involves multiple elements:
  • Hypothesis: A prediction about the relationship between variables.
  • Independent Variable: The variable that is changed or controlled to test its effects—like exercise in our example.
  • Dependent Variable: The outcome being measured, such as sleep quality in this scenario.
By maintaining consistency in the environment and using a control group, scientists can focus solely on the changes brought about by the variable they are testing.
Variable Comparison
The comparison between different groups is fundamental in determining the effectiveness of the independent variable. In the context of the exercise and sleep experiment, researchers compared two groups to draw conclusions about causation.
The two key groups in this study were:
  • Experimental Group: Participants who exercised regularly.
  • Control Group: Participants who did not exercise.
This setup allows researchers to observe differences in sleep quality between those who exercise and those who do not. If the sleeping patterns improved only in those who exercised, it provides strong evidence that exercise plays a significant role. Without comparing these distinct groups, it would be challenging to assert that exercise alone contributed to better sleep.
Confounding Variables
Confounding variables pose significant challenges in scientific studies, as they introduce alternative explanations for outcomes. These are factors other than the one being studied that might influence the study's results. In the exercise and sleep study, it's key to control for these variables to establish a clear cause-and-effect relationship.
To manage confounding variables, researchers can:
  • Randomize Participants: Randomly assigning subjects to groups helps ensure that potential confounders are equally distributed.
  • Standardize Conditions: Keeping the environment consistent minimizes the influence of external factors.
  • Include Control Groups: A control group that does not receive the treatment (exercise) helps attribute observed effects more directly to the independent variable alone.
By applying these strategies, researchers strengthen the validity of their findings, offering more reliable evidence on the effects of the variables they are interested in.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Researchers studied the herb black cohosh as a treatment for hot flashes caused by menopause. They randomly assigned 351 women aged 45 to 55 who reported at least two hot flashes a day to one of five groups: (1) black cohosh, (2) a multiherb supplement with black cohosh, (3) the multiherb supplement plus advice to consume more soy foods, (4) estrogen replacement therapy, or (5) receive a placebo. After a year, only the women given estrogen replacement therapy had symptoms different from those of the placebo group. [Annals of Internal Medicine \(145: 12,869-897]\) a) What kind of study was this? b) Is that an appropriate choice for this problem? c) Who were the subjects? d) Identify the treatment and response variables.

Scientists at a major pharmaceutical firm investigated the effectiveness of an herbal compound to treat the common cold. They exposed each subject to a cold virus, then gave him or her either the herbal compound or a sugar solution known to have no effect on colds. Several days later they assessed the patient's condition, using a cold severity scale ranging from 0 to \(5 .\) They found no evidence of benefits associated with the compound.

An experiment that showed that subjects fed the DASH diet were able to lower their blood pressure by an average of \(6.7\) points compared to a group fed a "control diet." All meals were prepared by dieticians. a) Why were the subjects randomly assigned to the diets instead of letting people pick what they wanted to eat? b) Why were the meals prepared by dieticians? c) Why did the researchers need the control group? If the DASH diet group's blood pressure was lower at the end of the experiment than at the beginning, wouldn't that prove the effectiveness of that diet? d) What additional information would you want to know in order to decide whether an average reduction in blood pressure of \(6.7\) points was statistically significant?

Some schools teach reading using phonics (the sounds made by letters) and others using whole language (word recognition). Suppose a school district wants to know which method works better. Suggest a design for an appropriate experiment.

When spending large amounts to purchase advertising time, companies want to know what audience they'll reach. In January \(2007, \mathrm{a}\) poll asked 1008 American adults whether they planned to watch the upcoming Super Bowl. Men and women were asked separately whether they were looking forward more to the football game or to watching the commercials. Among the men, \(16 \%\) were planning to watch and were looking forward primarily to the commercials. Among women, \(30 \%\) were looking forward primarily to the commercials. a) Was this a stratified sample or a blocked experiment? Explain. b) Was the design of the study appropriate for the advertisers' questions?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free