Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Exercise 2.143 on page 102 introduces a study examining years playing football, brain size, and percentile score on a cognitive skills test. We show computer output below for a model to predict Cognition score based on Years playing football. (The scatterplot given in Exercise 2.143 allows us to proceed without serious concerns about the conditions.) Pearson correlation of Years and Cognition \(=-0.366\) P-Value \(=0.015\) Regression Equation Cognition \(=102.3-3.34\) Years Coefficients \(\begin{array}{lrrrr}\text { Term } & \text { Coef } & \text { SE Coef } & \text { T-Value } & \text { P-Value } \\ \text { Constant } & 102.3 & 15.6 & 6.56 & 0.000 \\ \text { Years } & -3.34 & 1.31 & -2.55 & 0.015 \\ & & & & \\ & \text { S } & \text { R-sq } & \text { R-sq(adj) } & \text { R-sq(pred) } \\ 25.4993 & 13.39 \% & 11.33 \% & 5.75 \%\end{array}\) Analysis of Variance \(\begin{array}{lrrrrr}\text { Source } & \text { DF } & \text { Adj SS } & \text { Adj MS } & \text { F-Value } & \text { P-Value } \\\ \text { Regression } & 1 & 4223 & 4223.2 & 6.50 & 0.015 \\ \text { Error } & 42 & 27309 & 650.2 & & \\ \text { Total } & 43 & 31532 & & & \\ & \-- & & & \end{array}\) (a) What is the correlation between these two variables? What is the p-value for testing the correlation? (b) What is the slope of the regression line to predict cognition score based on years playing football? What is the t-statistic for testing the slope? What is the p-value for the test? (c) The ANOVA table is given for testing the effectiveness of this model. What is the F-statistic for the test? What is the p-value? (d) What do you notice about the three p-values for the three tests in parts \((\mathrm{a}),(\mathrm{b}),\) and \((\mathrm{c}) ?\) (e) In every case, at a \(5 \%\) level, what is the conclusion of the test in terms of football and cognition?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correlation between the years playing football and cognition score is -0.366. The p-value for testing this correlation is 0.015. The slope of the regression line is -3.34 and the t-statistic for testing the slope is -2.55. The p-value for the test is 0.015. The F-statistic for testing the effectiveness of the model is 6.50 and its p-value is 0.015. All three tests have the same p-value of 0.015. Therefore at a 5% level, we conclude that there is a statistically significant negative association between the years playing football and cognition scores.

Step by step solution

01

Get the correlation and p-value

From the Pearson correlation given, the correlation between the years and cognition is -0.366. The p-value for testing this correlation is 0.015.
02

Understand the regression equation

From the Regression Equation given, we can see that the slope is -3.34. This slope means that for every additional year of playing football, the cognition score decreases by 3.34 on average. The t-statistic for testing this slope is -2.55, and the p-value for the test is again 0.015. These values are found in the 'Coefficients' table.
03

Interpret the ANOVA table

Looking at the ANOVA table, the F-statistic for testing the effectiveness of this model is 6.50 and the p-value is 0.015.
04

Analyze the p-values

The p-value for the test of correlation, the test of the slope, and the test of the model from the ANOVA table are all the same and equal to 0.015.
05

Conclusion

Since the p-value is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis in each case. This means that there is a statistically significant negative association between years playing football and cognition scores. Therefore, the evidence suggests that the more years one plays football, the lower the cognition score.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show some computer output for fitting simple linear models. State the value of the sample slope for each model and give the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the slope in the population is different from zero. Identify the p-value and use it (and a \(5 \%\) significance level) to make a clear conclusion about the effectiveness of the model.$$ \begin{array}{lrrrr} \text { Coefficients: } & \text { Estimate } & \text { Std.Error } & \mathrm{t} \text { value } & \operatorname{Pr}(>|\mathrm{t}|) \\ \text { (Intercept) } & 807.79 & 87.78 & 9.30 & 0.000 \\ \mathrm{~A} & -3.659 & 1.199 & -3.05 & 0.006 \end{array} $$

Hantavirus is carried by wild rodents and causes severe lung disease in humans. A study \(^{5}\) on the California Channel Islands found that increased prevalence of the virus was linked with greater precipitation. The study adds "Precipitation accounted for \(79 \%\) of the variation in prevalence." (a) What notation or terminology do we use for the value \(79 \%\) in this context? (b) What is the response variable? What is the explanatory variable? (c) What is the correlation between the two variables?

FIBER IN CEREALS AS A PREDICTOR OF CALORIES In Example 9.10 on page \(592,\) we look at a model to predict the number of calories in a cup of breakfast cereal using the number of grams of sugars. In Exercises 9.64 and 9.65 , we give computer output with two regression intervals and information about a specific amount of sugar. Interpret each of the intervals in the context of this data situation. (a) The \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean response (b) The \(95 \%\) prediction interval for the response The intervals given are for cereals with 16 grams of sugars: Sugars 95 \(\mathrm{P}\) \(\begin{array}{rrr}\text { rs Fit } & \text { SE Fit } \\\ 6 & 157.88 & 7.10 & \text { (143.3 }\end{array}\) \(95 \% \mathrm{Cl}\) 35,172.42) \(9 \%\) \(\begin{array}{lllll}16 & 15788 & 7.10 & (143.35,172.42) & (101.46\end{array}\) 214.31)

Use this information to fill in all values in an analysis of variance for regression table as shown. $$ \begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline \text { Source } & \text { df } & \text { SS } & \text { MS } & \text { F-statistic } & \text { p-value } \\ \hline \text { Model } & & & & & \\ \hline \text { Error } & & & & & \\ \hline \text { Total } & & & & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ SSModel \(=800\) with SSTotal \(=5820\) and a sample size of \(n=40\)

Predicting Re-Election Margin Data 2.9 on page 106 introduces data on the approval rating of an incumbent US president and the margin of victory or defeat in the subsequent election (where negative numbers indicate the margin by which the incumbent president lost the re-election campaign). The data are reproduced in Table 9.5 and are available in ElectionMargin. Computer output for summary statistics for the two variables and for a regression model to predict the margin of victory or defeat from the approval rating is shown: The regression equation is Margin \(=-36.76+0.839\) Approval \(\begin{array}{lrrrr}\text { Term } & \text { Coef } & \text { SE Coef } & \text { T-Value } & \text { P-Value } \\ \text { Constant } & -36.76 & 8.34 & -4.41 & 0.001 \\ \text { Approval } & 0.839 & 0.155 & 5.43 & 0.000 \\\ S=5.66054 & R-S q=74.64 \% & R-S q(a d j) & =72.10 \%\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{lrrrrr}\text { Analysis of Variance } & & & & & \\ \text { Source } & \text { DF } & \text { SS } & \text { MS } & \text { F } & \text { P } \\ \text { Regression } & 1 & 943.0 & 943.04 & 29.43 & 0.000 \\ \text { Residual Error } & 10 & 320.4 & 32.04 & & \\ \text { Total } & 11 & 1263.5 & & & \end{array}\) Use values from this output to calculate and interpret the following. Show your work. (a) A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean margin of victory for all presidents with an approval rating of \(50 \%\) (b) A \(95 \%\) prediction interval for the margin of victory for a president with an approval rating of \(50 \%\) (c) A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean margin of victory if we have no information about the approval rating. (Hint: This is just an ordinary confidence interval for a mean based only on the single sample of Margin values.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free