Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Teams in the National Football League (NFL) in the US play four pre-season games each year before the regular season starts. Do teams that do well in the pre-season tend to also do well in the regular season? We are interested in whether there is a positive linear association between the number of wins in the pre-season and the number of wins in the regular season for teams in the NFL. (a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses for this test? (b) The correlation between these two variables for the 32 NFL teams over the 10 year period from 2005 to 2014 is 0.067 . Use this sample (with \(n=320\) ) to calculate the appropriate test statistic and determine the p-value for the test. (c) State the conclusion in context, using a \(5 \%\) significance level. (d) When an NFL team goes undefeated in the pre-season, should the fans expect lots of wins in the regular season?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) H0: There is no linear correlation between pre-season wins and regular season wins. Ha: There is a positive linear correlation between pre-season wins and regular season wins. (b) A calculation of the test statistic and the p-value is required here; which usually involves a statistical software/tool. (c) The conclusion is drawn based on whether the p-value is less than the significance level, interpreted within the context of NFL games. (d) The final interpretation on expectations from an undefeated pre-season is drawn in consideration with the results of the hypothesis test.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate the Null and Alternative hypothesis

For part (a), the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) would be formulated based on the assumption of no relationship and the possibility of a relationship respectively. H0: There is no linear correlation between pre-season wins and regular season wins. Ha: There is a positive linear correlation between pre-season wins and regular season wins.
02

Calculating the Test Statistic

In part (b), knowing the correlation (r=0.067) and the sample size (n=320), we calculate the test statistic (t) as follows: The formula is \(t = r \sqrt{(n-2)/(1-r^2)}\). Plugging the values of \(r\) and \(n\) into this equation, we calculate \(t\).
03

Determine the p-value

The p-value would be calculated using the generated test statistic with a degrees of freedom of n-2. Typically, this would require statistical software or lookup tables.
04

Conclusion in context

In step (c), the p-value is weighed against the significance level (in this case, 5%). If the p-value is lower than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis, suggesting a significant correlation. The conclusion would then be contextualized to the NFL setting.
05

Interpretation

In step (d), based on the results, an interpretation of the effect of an undefeated pre-season on fans' expectations would be made. The conclusion would be drawn based on the p-value indicating a significant or insignificant relationship.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

We give computer output with two regression intervals and information about the percent of calories eaten during the day. Interpret each of the intervals in the context of this data situation. (a) The \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean response (b) The \(95 \%\) prediction interval for the response The intervals given are for mice that eat \(10 \%\) of their calories during the day: DayPci 1.164 \(\begin{array}{rr}95 \% \mathrm{Cl} & 95 \% \mathrm{P} 1 \\\ (-0.013,4.783) & (-2.797,7.568)\end{array}\) 85 10.0 3888 2:

We show an ANOVA table for regression. State the hypotheses of the test, give the F-statistic and the p-value, and state the conclusion of the test. $$ \begin{aligned} &\text { Response: } Y\\\ &\begin{array}{lrrrrr} & \text { Df } & \text { Sum Sq } & \text { Mean Sq } & \mathrm{F} \text { value } & \operatorname{Pr}(>\mathrm{F}) \\ \text { ModelA } & 1 & 352.97 & 352.97 & 11.01 & 0.001 * * \\ \text { Residuals } & 359 & 11511.22 & 32.06 & & \\ \text { Total } & 360 & 11864.20 & & & \end{array} \end{aligned} $$

Test the correlation, as indicated. Show all details of the test. Test for evidence of a linear association; \(r=0.28 ; n=10\)

Golf Scores In a professional golf tournament the players participate in four rounds of golf and the player with the lowest score after all four rounds is the champion. How well does a player's performance in the first round of the tournament predict the final score? Table 9.6 shows the first round score and final score for a random sample of 20 golfers who made the cut in a recent Masters tournament. The data are also stored in MastersGolf. Computer output for a regression model to predict the final score from the first-round score is shown. Use values from this output to calculate and interpret the following. Show your work. (a) Find a \(95 \%\) interval to predict the average final score of all golfers whoshoot a 0 on the first round at the Masters. (b) Find a \(95 \%\) interval to predict the final score of a golfer who shoots a -5 in the first round at the Masters. (c) Find a \(95 \%\) interval to predict the average final score of all golfers who shoot a +3 in the first round at the Masters. The regression equation is Final \(=0.162+1.48\) First \(\begin{array}{lrrrr}\text { Predictor } & \text { Coef } & \text { SE Coef } & \text { T } & \text { P } \\ \text { Constant } & 0.1617 & 0.8173 & 0.20 & 0.845 \\ \text { First } & 1.4758 & 0.2618 & 5.64 & 0.000 \\ S=3.59805 & R-S q=63.8 \% & \text { R-Sq }(a d j) & =61.8 \%\end{array}\) Analysis of Variance Source Regression Residual Error Total \(\begin{array}{rrrrr}\text { DF } & \text { SS } & \text { MS } & \text { F } & \text { P } \\ 1 & 411.52 & 411.52 & 31.79 & 0.000 \\ 18 & 233.03 & 12.95 & & \\ 19 & 644.55 & & & \end{array}\)

A common (and hotly debated) saying among sports fans is "Defense wins championships." Is offensive scoring ability or defensive stinginess a better indicator of a team's success? To investigate this question we'll use data from the \(2015-2016\) National Basketball Association (NBA) regular season. The data \(^{6}\) stored in NBAStandings2016 include each team's record (wins, losses, and winning percentage) along with the average number of points the team scored per game (PtsFor) and average number of points scored against them ( PtsAgainst). (a) Examine scatterplots for predicting \(\operatorname{WinPct}\) using PtsFor and predicting WinPct using PtsAgainst. In each case, discuss whether conditions for fitting a linear model appear to be met. (b) Fit a model to predict winning percentage (WinPct) using offensive ability (PtsFor). Write down the prediction equation and comment on whether PtsFor is an effective predictor. (c) Repeat the process of part (b) using PtsAgainst as the predictor. (d) Compare and interpret \(R^{2}\) for both models. (e) The Golden State Warriors set an NBA record by winning 73 games in the regular season and only losing 9 (WinPct \(=0.890\) ). They scored an average of 114.9 points per game while giving up an average of 104.1 points against. Find the predicted winning percentage for the Warriors using each of the models in (b) and (c). (f) Overall, does one of the predictors, PtsFor or PtsAgainst, appear to be more effective at explaining winning percentages for NBA teams? Give some justification for your answer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free