Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In a recent study, \(^{24} 2006\) randomly selected US adults (age 18 or older) were asked to give the number of people in the last six months "with whom you discussed matters that are important to you." The average number of close confidants was 2.2 with a standard deviation of 1.4 (a) Find the margin of error for this estimate if we want \(99 \%\) confidence. (b) Find and interpret a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for average number of close confidants.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The margin of error with 99% confidence is 0.0734. The 99% confidence interval for the average number of close confidants is \(2.1266, 2.2734\), meaning that we can be 99% confident that the true population mean falls within this range.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Standard Error

The standard error (SE) is found by dividing the standard deviation by the square root of the sample size: \nSE = \( \frac{1.4}{\sqrt{2406}} = 0.0285 \)
02

Find the Z-value for 99% Confidence

A Z table or calculator is usually used for this. The Z value for 99% confidence is \(2.576\).
03

Calculate the Margin of Error

The margin of error for a sample is calculated by multiplying the Z value by the standard error: \nMargin of Error = \(2.576 * 0.0285 = 0.0734 \)
04

Calculate the Confidence Interval

The confidence interval is found by taking the mean and adding and subtracting the margin of error. In this case, the mean was 2.2. So the confidence interval is: \n\(2.2 - 0.0734, 2.2 + 0.0734 = (2.1266, 2.2734)\)
05

Interpret the Results

This means that we can be 99% confident that the population mean number of close confidants falls between 2.1266 and 2.2734.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When we want \(95 \%\) confidence and use the conservative estimate of \(p=0.5,\) we can use the simple formula \(n=1 /(M E)^{2}\) to estimate the sample size needed for a given margin of error ME. In Exercises 6.40 to 6.43, use this formula to determine the sample size needed for the given margin of error. A margin of error of 0.05 .

Using Data 5.1 on page \(375,\) we find a significant difference in the proportion of fruit flies surviving after 13 days between those eating organic potatoes and those eating conventional (not organic) potatoes. ask you to conduct a hypothesis test using additional data from this study. \(^{40}\) In every case, we are testing $$\begin{array}{ll}H_{0}: & p_{o}=p_{c} \\\H_{a}: & p_{o}>p_{c}\end{array}$$ where \(p_{o}\) and \(p_{c}\) represent the proportion of fruit flies alive at the end of the given time frame of those eating organic food and those eating conventional food, respectively. Also, in every case, we have \(n_{1}=n_{2}=500 .\) Show all remaining details in the test, using a \(5 \%\) significance level. Effect of Organic Potatoes after 20 Days After 20 days, 250 of the 500 fruit flies eating organic potatoes are still alive, while 130 of the 500 eating conventional potatoes are still alive.

Statistical Inference in Babies Is statistical inference intuitive to babies? In other words, are babies able to generalize from sample to population? In this study, \(1 \quad 8\) -month-old infants watched someone draw a sample of five balls from an opaque box. Each sample consisted of four balls of one color (red or white) and one ball of the other color. After observing the sample, the side of the box was lifted so the infants could see all of the balls inside (the population). Some boxes had an "expected" population, with balls in the same color proportions as the sample, while other boxes had an "unexpected" population, with balls in the opposite color proportion from the sample. Babies looked at the unexpected populations for an average of 9.9 seconds \((\mathrm{sd}=4.5\) seconds) and the expected populations for an average of 7.5 seconds \((\mathrm{sd}=4.2\) seconds). The sample size in each group was \(20,\) and you may assume the data in each group are reasonably normally distributed. Is this convincing evidence that babies look longer at the unexpected population, suggesting that they make inferences about the population from the sample? (a) State the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Calculate the relevant sample statistic. (c) Calculate the t-statistic.

A data collection method is described to investigate a difference in means. In each case, determine which data analysis method is more appropriate: paired data difference in means or difference in means with two separate groups. A study investigating the effect of exercise on brain activity recruits sets of identical twins in middle age, in which one twin is randomly assigned to engage in regular exercise and the other doesn't exercise.

Use the t-distribution and the given sample results to complete the test of the given hypotheses. Assume the results come from random samples, and if the sample sizes are small, assume the underlying distributions are relatively normal. Test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}>\mu_{2}\) using the sample results \(\bar{x}_{1}=56, s_{1}=8.2\) with \(n_{1}=30\) and \(\bar{x}_{2}=51, s_{2}=6.9\) with \(n_{2}=40\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free