Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

As part of the same study described in Exercise 6.254 , the researchers also were interested in whether babies preferred singing or speech. Forty-eight of the original fifty infants were exposed to both singing and speech by the same woman. Interest was again measured by the amount of time the baby looked at the woman while she made noise. In this case the mean time while speaking was 66.97 with a standard deviation of \(43.42,\) and the mean for singing was 56.58 with a standard deviation of 31.57 seconds. The mean of the differences was 10.39 more seconds for the speaking treatment with a standard deviation of 55.37 seconds. Perform the appropriate test to determine if this is sufficient evidence to conclude that babies have a preference (either way) between speaking and singing.

Short Answer

Expert verified
To make a definitive statement, the test statistic should be calculated and compared with the critical value from the t-distribution table. Depending on whether it is less or greater than the critical value, a decision can be made whether to reject or not reject the null hypothesis. Nevertheless, given the relatively high standard deviation in the speaking treatment condition, it may be suggestive that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, signifying that there might not be a significant difference in the babies' preference for speech or song. More steps involved in the computation process are required to reach a more accurate conclusion.

Step by step solution

01

State the null and alternative hypotheses

The null hypothesis \(H_0\) asserts that there is no difference between the average durations babies listen to speaking and singing. Stated in mathematical terms, the null hypothesis is \(H_0: \mu_{speak} = \mu_{sing}\). The alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) suggests that there is a significant difference between these two variables. It is \(H_a: \mu_{speak} \neq \mu_{sing}\).
02

Choose the level of significance

The level of significance has not been given. However, 0.05 is a common standard in most scientific studies and will be used here. So, \(\alpha = 0.05\)
03

Compute the test statistic

To perform the t-test for independent samples, the test statistic is calculated by the formula \n\[ t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{s_{d} / \sqrt{n}}\] \nwhere \n\(\bar{x}_1, \bar{x}_2 \) are the means of two samples, \n\(s_{d}\) is the standard deviation of differences between two samples, \nand n is the number of observations. \nInputting the given values into the formula, \n\n \[ t = \frac{10.39}{55.37 / \sqrt{48}} \]
04

Determine the critical value

The critical value for a two-tailed t-test with \(\alpha = 0.05\) and degrees of freedom \(df = n - 1 = 47\) is approximately ±2.0116 according to t-distribution tables.
05

Make a decision

If the absolute value of the test statistic from step 3 is greater than the critical value from step 4, we reject \(H_0\). Otherwise, we do not reject \(H_0\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null and Alternative Hypotheses
Understanding the difference between null and alternative hypotheses is crucial in hypothesis testing. The null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), represents the default or status quo assumption that there is no effect or no difference in the general population. For the exercise in question, the null hypothesis posits that there is no preference between speech and singing for babies, which mathematically can be expressed as \(H_0: \mu_{speak} = \mu_{sing}\). On the flip side, the alternative hypothesis, denoted as \(H_a\) or \(H_1\), is the assertion that contradicts the null hypothesis. It's what the researcher aims to support. In this case, the alternative hypothesis claims there is a preference, either for speaking or singing, hence \(H_a: \mu_{speak} eq \mu_{sing}\). Choosing the right hypotheses sets the stage for the entire hypothesis testing process.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted by the Greek letter \(\alpha\), gauges the threshold at which the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative. A commonly used significance level is 0.05, which indicates a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is none (type I error). Selecting the appropriate significance level affects how stringent the hypothesis test is and impacts the conclusions drawn from the data. In the exercise, a standard significance level of \(\alpha = 0.05\) is selected. This level of significance is a balance between being too lenient and too strict, allowing for a fair assessment of the evidence against the null hypothesis.
T-Test for Independent Samples
The t-test for independent samples compares the means of two independent groups to determine whether there is statistical evidence that the associated population means are significantly different. It's ideal for scenarios like the exercise where two different conditions (speaking and singing) are tested on different occasions. The formula for the t-statistic in an independent samples t-test is \[ t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{s_{d} / \sqrt{n}} \] where \(\bar{x}_1\) and \(\bar{x}_2\) are the sample means for each group, \(s_{d}\) is the standard deviation of the differences, and \(n\) is the sample size. A critical aspect is to verify that the samples are independent and the data are approximately distributed normally.
Test Statistic
The test statistic is a standardized value used to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. It's the result of transforming the observed data into a single value that can be compared against the critical value from a statistical distribution. In the context of the t-test for independent samples, the test statistic quantifies the distance between the sample means relative to the variability in the data. The calculated t-statistic provides a means of determining how extreme the observed result is, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. In our exercise, it's derived from the formula mentioned above.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom, often abbreviated as df, are a concept tied to the precision with which a statistic estimates a parameter. It reflects the number of independent values that can vary in the calculation of a statistic. In a t-test, the degrees of freedom are typically the number of observations minus the number of parameters that need to be estimated. For an independent samples t-test, the degrees of freedom are calculated as \(df = n_1 + n_2 - 2\) where \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) represent the sample sizes of the two groups. In the exercise example, the degrees of freedom are 47, which comes from 48 observations minus 1.
T-distribution
The t-distribution is a probability distribution that arises when estimating the mean of a normally distributed population in situations where the sample size is small and the population standard deviation is unknown. It's bell-shaped and symmetric like the normal distribution but has heavier tails, meaning that it gives more probability to observations further from the mean. This shape allows for the increased variability expected with smaller sample sizes. In hypothesis testing, the t-distribution helps to find the critical value that the test statistic should exceed to reject the null hypothesis. For the exercise with 47 degrees of freedom, one would refer to the t-distribution to find the appropriate critical value, given the chosen significance level.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Split the Bill? Exercise 2.153 on page 105 describes a study to compare the cost of restaurant meals when people pay individually versus splitting the bill as a group. In the experiment half of the people were told they would each be responsible for individual meal costs and the other half were told the cost would be split equally among the six people at the table. The data in SplitBill includes the cost of what each person ordered (in Israeli shekels) and the payment method (Individual or Split). Some summary statistics are provided in Table 6.20 and both distributions are reasonably bell-shaped. Use this information to test (at a \(5 \%\) level ) if there is evidence that the mean cost is higher when people split the bill. You may have done this test using randomizations in Exercise 4.118 on page 302 .

In Exercises 6.32 and 6.33, find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion two ways: using StatKey or other technology and percentiles from a bootstrap distribution, and using the normal distribution and the formula for standard error. Compare the results. Proportion of home team wins in soccer, using \(\hat{p}=0.583\) with \(n=120\)

Football Air Pressure During the NFL's 2014 AFC championship game, officials measured the air pressure on game balls following a tip that one team's balls were under-inflated. In exercise 6.124 we found that the 11 balls measured for the New England Patriots had a mean psi of 11.10 (well below the legal limit) and a standard deviation of 0.40. Patriot supporters could argue that the under-inflated balls were due to the elements and other outside effects. To test this the officials also measured 4 balls from the opposing team (Indianapolis Colts) to be used in comparison and found a mean psi of \(12.63,\) with a standard deviation of 0.12. There is no significant skewness or outliers in the data. Use the t-distribution to determine if the average air pressure in the New England Patriot's balls was significantly less than the average air pressure in the Indianapolis Colt's balls.

Can Malaria Parasites Control Mosquito Behavior? Are malaria parasites able to control mosquito behavior to their advantage? A study \(^{43}\) investigated this question by taking mosquitos and giving them the opportunity to have their first "blood meal" from a mouse. The mosquitoes were randomized to either eat from a mouse infected with malaria or an uninfected mouse. At several time points after this, mosquitoes were put into a cage with a human and it was recorded whether or not each mosquito approached the human (presumably to bite, although mosquitoes were caught before biting). Once infected, the malaria parasites in the mosquitoes go through two stages: the Oocyst stage in which the mosquito has been infected but is not yet infectious to others and then the Sporozoite stage in which the mosquito is infectious to others. Malaria parasites would benefit if mosquitoes sought risky blood meals (such as biting a human) less often in the Oocyst stage (because mosquitos are often killed while attempting a blood meal) and more often in the Sporozoite stage after becoming infectious (because this is one of the primary ways in which malaria is transmitted). Does exposing mosquitoes to malaria actually impact their behavior in this way? (a) In the Oocyst stage (after eating from mouse but before becoming infectious), 20 out of 113 mosquitoes in the group exposed to malaria approached the human and 36 out of 117 mosquitoes in the group not exposed to malaria approached the human. Calculate the Z-statistic. (b) Calculate the p-value for testing whether this provides evidence that the proportion of mosquitoes in the Oocyst stage approaching the human is lower in the group exposed to malaria. (c) In the Sporozoite stage (after becoming infectious), 37 out of 149 mosquitoes in the group exposed to malaria approached the human and 14 out of 144 mosquitoes in the group not exposed to malaria approached the human. Calculate the z-statistic. (d) Calculate the p-value for testing whether this provides evidence that the proportion of mosquitoes in the Sporozoite stage approaching the human is higher in the group exposed to malaria. (e) Based on your p-values, make conclusions about what you have learned about mosquito behavior, stage of infection, and exposure to malaria or not. (f) Can we conclude that being exposed to malaria (as opposed to not being exposed to malaria) causes these behavior changes in mosquitoes? Why or why not?

In Exercises 6.150 and \(6.151,\) use StatKey or other technology to generate a bootstrap distribution of sample differences in proportions and find the standard error for that distribution. Compare the result to the value obtained using the formula for the standard error of a difference in proportions from this section. Sample A has a count of 90 successes with \(n=120\) and Sample \(\mathrm{B}\) has a count of 180 successes with \(n=300\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free