Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What Do People Do on Facebook? In the survey of 2255 US adults described in Exercise \(6.24,\) we also learn that 970 of the respondents use the social networking site Facebook. Of the 970 Facebook users, the survey shows that on an average day: \- \(15 \%\) update their status \- \(22 \%\) comment on another's post or status \- \(20 \%\) comment on another user's photo \- \(26 \%\) "like" another user's content \- \(10 \%\) send another user a private message (a) For each of the bulleted activities, find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of Facebook users engaging in that activity on an average day. (b) Is it plausible that the proportion commenting on another's post or status is the same as the proportion updating their status? Justify your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The confidence interval calculations will yield the definite intervals for every activity. If the confidence intervals for the proportion updating their status and the proportion commenting on another's post overlap, it is plausible that the proportions are the same. If they do not overlap, it cannot be concluded that the proportions are the same.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the confidence intervals

The confidence intervals can be calculated using the formula:\n\n\[CI = p \pm Z \times \sqrt{\frac{p \times (1-p)}{n}} \]\nwhere:- \(p\) is the proportion (percentage divided by 100),- \(n\) is the sample size (number of Facebook users), - \(Z\) is the Z value from the Z table corresponding to the desired level of confidence (here 95%, so Z = 1.96).This has to be calculated for each activity, substituting the respective proportions.
02

Evaluate the plausibility

To evaluate the plausibility that the proportion commenting on another's post or status is the same as the proportion updating their status, compare the confidence intervals of the two activities. If the intervals overlap, it is plausible that the proportions are the same and if not, then they are not likely to be the same.
03

Formulate the answer

After calculating the confidence intervals for every activity and comparing the intervals of 'updating status' with 'commenting on another's post', a conclusion can be drawn regarding the plausibility.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Facebook User Behavior
Understanding Facebook user behavior is crucial for conducting any kind of research that involves social media usage. When we examine how individuals interact with features on Facebook, such as updating statuses, commenting, or liking content, we gain insights into their social habits. For instance, different patterns of interaction can reveal the popularity and significance of certain features, user engagement levels, and how users maintain their social presence online.

In the given exercise, various percentages represent engagement in different Facebook activities, such as updating status or sending private messages. These figures shed light on the typical behaviors of Facebook users, providing useful information for marketers, sociologists, and the tech industry. By establishing a comprehensive picture of user engagement, stakeholders can tailor their strategies to align with the preferences of the target demographic.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method that allows us to make inferences about populations based on sample data. It's a process used across various fields to determine the likelihood of a hypothesis being true for a given set of data. At the heart of hypothesis testing lies the concept of the null hypothesis, which is a default statement that there is no effect or no difference. The alternative hypothesis, conversely, is the statement we are trying to find evidence for.

When hypothesizing about Facebook user behavior, we might ask questions like 'Is it plausible that the proportion of users commenting on posts is the same as those updating their status?' To answer such questions, we use hypothesis testing to compare the estimates of user activities and analyze if observed differences are statistically significant or could have occurred by random chance.
Proportion Estimation
Proportion estimation involves determining the percentage of a population that exhibits a particular trait or behavior. It is fundamental in many research studies, including surveys about user behavior on social media platforms like Facebook. In our exercise, proportion estimation is used to quantify the percentage of users participating in certain activities, such as liking content or sending private messages.

To provide a range within which the true proportion is likely to fall, we construct confidence intervals. These intervals are computed using the sample proportion, the size of the sample, and the desired level of confidence. A 95% confidence interval, for example, implies that if we were to take many samples and compute a confidence interval from each, we'd expect about 95% of those intervals to contain the true population proportion. Keeping this level of confidence allows us to estimate ranges for behaviors with a high degree of certainty, making it a powerful and commonly used statistical tool.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Physician's Health Study In the Physician's Health Study, introduced in Data 1.6 on page 37 , 22,071 male physicians participated in a study to determine whether taking a daily low-dose aspirin reduced the risk of heart attacks. The men were randomly assigned to two groups and the study was double-blind. After five years, 104 of the 11,037 men taking a daily low-dose aspirin had had a heart attack while 189 of the 11,034 men taking a placebo had had a heart attack. \({ }^{39}\) Does taking a daily lowdose aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Conduct the test, and, in addition, explain why we can infer a causal relationship from the results.

Effect of Splitting the Bill Exercise 2.153 on page 105 describes a study to compare the cost of restaurant meals when people pay individually versus splitting the bill as a group. In the experiment half of the people were told they would each be responsible for individual meal costs and the other half were told the cost would be split equally among the six people at the table. The 24 people paying individually had a mean cost of 37.29 Israeli shekels with a standard deviation of 12.54 , while the 24 people splitting the bill had a higher mean cost of 50.92 Israeli shekels with a standard deviation of 14.33. The raw data can be found in SplitBill and both distributions are reasonably bell-shaped. Use this information to find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean meal cost between these two situations.

Surgery in the ICU and Gender In the dataset ICUAdmissions, the variable Service indicates whether the ICU (Intensive Care Unit) patient had surgery (1) or other medical treatment (0) and the variable Sex gives the gender of the patient \((0\) for males and 1 for females.) Use technology to test at a \(5 \%\) level whether there is a difference between males and females in the proportion of ICU patients who have surgery.

We examine the effect of different inputs on determining the sample size needed to obtain a specific margin of error when finding a confidence interval for a proportion. Find the sample size needed to give, with \(95 \%\) confidence, a margin of error within \(\pm 3 \%\) when estimating a proportion. First, find the sample size needed if we have no prior knowledge about the population proportion \(p\). Then find the sample size needed if we have reason to believe that \(p \approx 0.7\). Finally, find the sample size needed if we assume \(p \approx 0.9 .\) Comment on the relationship between the sample size and estimates of \(p\).

Use a t-distribution and the given matched pair sample results to complete the test of the given hypotheses. Assume the results come from random samples, and if the sample sizes are small, assume the underlying distribution of the differences is relatively normal. Assume that differences are computed using \(d=x_{1}-x_{2}\). Test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}>\mu_{2}\) using the paired data in the following table: $$ \begin{array}{lllllllllll} \hline \text { Situation } & 1 & 125 & 156 & 132 & 175 & 153 & 148 & 180 & 135 & 168 & 157 \\ \text { Situation } & 2 & 120 & 145 & 142 & 150 & 160 & 148 & 160 & 142 & 162 & 150 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free