Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In a survey of 1000 US adults, twenty percent say they never exercise. This is the highest level seen in five years. \(^{5}\) Find and interpret a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of US adults who say they never exercise. What is the margin of error, with \(99 \%\) confidence?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The 99% confidence interval for the proportion of US adults who never exercise is between 16.77% and 23.23%. The margin of error, at 99% confidence, is approximately 0.0326 or 3.26%.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Sample Proportion

Calculate the sample proportion ( \( p \) ) by dividing the number of adults who say they 'never' exercise by the total number of adults surveyed. Since there are 200 adults who 'never' exercise, out of 1000 respondents, \( p = 200 / 1000 = 0.20 \).
02

Determine the Z-Score

For a 99% confidence level, the corresponding Z-score value (denoted as \( Z_{0.01/2} \)), can be found in a standard normal distribution table as 2.58.
03

Calculate the Standard Error

Standard error of the sample proportion is calculated as \( SE = \sqrt{ (p*(1-p)) / n } \). Note that \( n \) is the sample size. After substituting \( p = 0.20 \) and \( n = 1000 \), the standard error becomes \( SE = \sqrt{ (0.20 * 0.80) / 1000 } = 0.01265 \).
04

Determine Confidence Interval

We use the formula \( CI = p \pm Z_{\alpha/2}*SE \). By substituting the values \( p = 0.20 \), \( Z_{\alpha/2} = 2.58 \), and \( SE = 0.01265 \) into the formula, the confidence interval becomes \( CI = 0.20 \pm 2.58 * 0.01265 \), which reduces to \( CI = [0.1677, 0.2323] \).
05

Calculate the Margin of Error

Margin of error is calculated as \( ME = Z_{\alpha/2}*SE \). Substitute the values of \( Z_{0.01/2} = 2.58 \) and \( SE = 0.01265 \) into the formula to obtain \( ME = 2.58 * 0.01265 = 0.0326 \)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Proportion
Understanding the concept of sample proportion is paramount when conducting a survey or an experiment where you're gauging prevalence or frequency of a certain trait within a population.

For instance, imagine you've asked 1000 people about their exercise habits, and 200 people admit they never exercise. The sample proportion (\( p \)) is then the fraction representing this group, calculated by dividing the number who never exercise by the total number surveyed, which in this case is 200 out of 1000, or 0.20.

This proportion is a crucial building block for further statistical assessments, including confidence intervals and margin of error, because it offers a snapshot of the characteristic being measured within your sample that you will use to infer about the larger population.
Z-score
A Z-score is a statistical measure that tells us how many standard deviations an element is from the mean. In the context of confidence intervals, it's used to determine how confident we can be about the range within which the true population proportion lies, based on our sample data.

In our current example, a 99% confidence level requires a Z-score that corresponds to the area under the standard normal curve. We commonly refer to statistical tables, or nowadays, we use software that provides us with a Z-score of 2.58. This high Z-score reflects the high confidence level we are aiming for and widens the confidence interval accordingly. Consequently, a higher confidence level like 99% (compared to 95%, for instance) leads to a broader range of values, but with more certainty that this range includes the true population proportion.
Standard Error
The standard error (SE) is the estimate of the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of a statistic, most commonly of the mean or proportion. It's a measure of how much we expect the sample statistic to vary from one random sample to another.

In the context of a proportion, the formula for standard error is \( SE = \sqrt{ (p*(1-p)) / n } \), where \( p \) is the sample proportion and \( n \) is the sample size. As shown in our exercise, with a sample proportion of 0.20 and a sample size of 1000, the standard error is \( SE = \sqrt{ (0.20 * 0.80) / 1000 } = 0.01265 \). The smaller the standard error, the more precise our estimate of the population proportion is likely to be.
Margin of Error
A fundamental concept when communicating the precision of survey results is the margin of error (ME). It reflects the maximum expected difference between the true population parameter and a sample estimate of that parameter.

The margin of error is calculated using the standard error and the Z-score. In our given problem, by multiplying the standard error (0.01265) with the Z-score (2.58), we get a margin of error of about 0.0326. This means we can say with 99% confidence that the true proportion of US adults who do not exercise is within approximately 3.26 percentage points of the sample proportion (20%). Understanding and reporting this margin allows people to comprehend the possible variation in the data and assess the reliability of the survey results.
Statistical Significance
The concept of statistical significance is typically associated with hypothesis testing, but it's also relevant when discussing confidence intervals. It tells us whether the results from a study or experiment can be considered to reflect a true effect rather than just random chance.

When we calculate a 99% confidence interval, we are indicating that, if we were to take many samples and build a confidence interval from each sample, 99% of those intervals would include the true population proportion. In other words, there is only a 1% chance that our interval does not include the true proportion—leading us to believe that our results have statistical significance because the likelihood that they've occurred by chance is very low. Being aware of statistical significance is of immense value in assessing the validity of study outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

We saw in Exercise 6.221 on page 466 that drinking tea appears to offer a strong boost to the immune system. In a study extending the results of the study described in that exercise, \(^{58}\) blood samples were taken on five participants before and after one week of drinking about five cups of tea a day (the participants did not drink tea before the study started). The before and after blood samples were exposed to e. coli bacteria, and production of interferon gamma, a molecule that fights bacteria, viruses, and tumors, was measured. Mean production went from \(155 \mathrm{pg} / \mathrm{mL}\) before tea drinking to \(448 \mathrm{pg} / \mathrm{mL}\) after tea drinking. The mean difference for the five subjects is \(293 \mathrm{pg} / \mathrm{mL}\) with a standard deviation in the differences of \(242 .\) The paper implies that the use of the t-distribution is appropriate. (a) Why is it appropriate to use paired data in this analysis? (b) Find and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the mean increase in production of interferon gamma after drinking tea for one week.

Effect of Splitting the Bill Exercise 2.153 on page 105 describes a study to compare the cost of restaurant meals when people pay individually versus splitting the bill as a group. In the experiment half of the people were told they would each be responsible for individual meal costs and the other half were told the cost would be split equally among the six people at the table. The 24 people paying individually had a mean cost of 37.29 Israeli shekels with a standard deviation of 12.54 , while the 24 people splitting the bill had a higher mean cost of 50.92 Israeli shekels with a standard deviation of 14.33. The raw data can be found in SplitBill and both distributions are reasonably bell-shaped. Use this information to find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean meal cost between these two situations.

Use the t-distribution and the given sample results to complete the test of the given hypotheses. Assume the results come from random samples, and if the sample sizes are small, assume the underlying distributions are relatively normal. Test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1} \neq \mu_{2}\) using the sample results \(\bar{x}_{1}=15.3, s_{1}=11.6\) with \(n_{1}=100\) and \(\bar{x}_{2}=18.4, s_{2}=14.3\) with \(n_{2}=80\).

Use a t-distribution and the given matched pair sample results to complete the test of the given hypotheses. Assume the results come from random samples, and if the sample sizes are small, assume the underlying distribution of the differences is relatively normal. Assume that differences are computed using \(d=x_{1}-x_{2}\). Test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}<\mu_{2}\) using the paired data in the following table: $$ \begin{array}{lllllllll} \hline \text { Treatment } 1 & 16 & 12 & 18 & 21 & 15 & 11 & 14 & 22 \\ \text { Treatment } 2 & 18 & 20 & 25 & 21 & 19 & 8 & 15 & 20 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Do Hands Adapt to Water? Researchers in the UK designed a study to determine if skin wrinkled from submersion in water performed better at handling wet objects. \(^{62}\) They gathered 20 participants and had each move a set of wet objects and a set of dry objects before and after submerging their hands in water for 30 minutes (order of trials was randomized). The response is the time (seconds) it took to move the specific set of objects with wrinkled hands minus the time with unwrinkled hands. The mean difference for moving dry objects was 0.85 seconds with a standard deviation of 11.5 seconds. The mean difference for moving wet objects was -15.1 seconds with a standard deviation of 13.4 seconds. (a) Perform the appropriate test to determine if the wrinkled hands were significantly faster than unwrinkled hands at moving dry objects. (b) Perform the appropriate test to determine if the wrinkled hands were significantly faster than unwrinkled hands at moving wet objects.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free