Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Who Eats More Fiber: Males or Females? Use technology and the NutritionStudy dataset to find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in number of grams of fiber (Fiber) eaten in a day between males and females. Interpret the answer in context. Is "No difference" between males and females a plausible option for the population difference in mean number of grams of fiber eaten?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The short answer will be determined after calculating the 95% confidence interval for the difference in means. If the interval contains 0, then 'No difference' is a plausible hypothesis considering the population difference in the mean number of grams of fiber eaten between males and females. Otherwise, 'No difference' is unlikely.

Step by step solution

01

Data Collection and Organization

Obtain the NutritionStudy dataset and separate it into two categories: male and female. Save the values of daily fiber intake. Calculations will be made separately for each group.
02

Calculate the Means

Use the mean formula to calculate the average fiber intake for both males and females. This provides the midpoint of the fiber consumption range for each gender.
03

Calculate the Standard Deviations

Compute the standard deviation for the daily fiber intake of both genders. This measure provides an understanding of how spread out the data is from the mean.
04

Calculate the Standard Errors

Calculate the standard error for each group. The standard error is the standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size. It shows how accurate the mean of the sample is relative to the actual population mean.
05

Determine the Confidence Interval

Compute the 95% confidence interval for the difference in means. The formula: \((mean_1 - mean_2) \pm Z* \sqrt{SE_1^2 + SE_2^2}\), where Z is the value from the standard normal distribution corresponding to the desired confidence level (1.96 for 95%). This interval gives the range of plausible values for the difference in mean fiber intake between genders.
06

Interpret the Results

If the confidence interval includes 0, then there's a significant chance that no real difference in mean fiber intake exists between males and females in the entire population. But if it doesn't include 0, then the 'No difference' proposition is likely false.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis is the cornerstone of understanding data and reaching conclusions in any research, including nutritional studies. It involves the collection, organization, and interpretation of data to discover underlying patterns and trends. In the context of comparing fiber intake between males and females, statistical analysis starts with data collection and organization, where we split a dataset based on gender.

Following this, we measure central tendencies (like mean) and dispersion (like standard deviation) for each group. But, merely knowing these numbers isn't enough; we must understand the accuracy of our estimates—as indicated by the standard error. In nutritional science, such nuanced analyses are essential since they account for natural variation in dietary habits.

Lastly, determining the confidence interval provides a range in which we can say, with a given level of certainty (95% here), where the true difference in means lies. This is done using a critical value from the standard normal distribution (Z-score) and the standard errors of the means. Such statistical methods help ensure that our findings are not just by chance but rather reflective of the actual population’s fiber consumption habits.
Fiber Intake Comparison
When comparing the dietary fiber intake between two groups, like males and females, we are essentially looking for significant differences that could have implications for nutritional advice and gender-specific dietary guidelines. The comparison is executed by deriving separate mean intake values from each group and identifying the spread of those values.

To accurately compare fiber intake, we consider the means within the context of their respective variances, encapsulated by the standard deviations. The comparison becomes robust when we incorporate the concept of standard error, which takes sample size into account, ensuring that our estimates are not skewed by the number of observations.

Using the confidence interval, we can speak to whether the observed difference in means is statistically significant and not due to random chance. This is critical in determining if a finding is meaningful enough to influence nutritional recommendations or if further study is warranted.
Nutrition Study
Nutrition studies are pivotal for understanding how different variables like gender affect dietary habits, such as fiber intake. These studies often involve complex datasets that require meticulous statistical examination to unravel the effects of diet on health. They serve as a basis for establishing dietary guidelines and informing public health policy.

The confidence interval in such a study helps us interpret the data within a practical context. It provides an estimate of the range within which the true difference in fiber intake likely falls, giving insights that are not only statistically significant but also biologically meaningful.

Through steps such as hypothesis testing and calculating confidence intervals, nutrition studies can provide authoritative answers to questions about diet and health, like the difference in fiber consumption between different demographics. Ultimately, the integration of rigorous statistical analysis in nutrition studies contributes profoundly to our knowledge and can lead to improved health outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do Hands Adapt to Water? Researchers in the UK designed a study to determine if skin wrinkled from submersion in water performed better at handling wet objects. \(^{62}\) They gathered 20 participants and had each move a set of wet objects and a set of dry objects before and after submerging their hands in water for 30 minutes (order of trials was randomized). The response is the time (seconds) it took to move the specific set of objects with wrinkled hands minus the time with unwrinkled hands. The mean difference for moving dry objects was 0.85 seconds with a standard deviation of 11.5 seconds. The mean difference for moving wet objects was -15.1 seconds with a standard deviation of 13.4 seconds. (a) Perform the appropriate test to determine if the wrinkled hands were significantly faster than unwrinkled hands at moving dry objects. (b) Perform the appropriate test to determine if the wrinkled hands were significantly faster than unwrinkled hands at moving wet objects.

Use StatKey or other technology to generate a bootstrap distribution of sample proportions and find the standard error for that distribution. Compare the result to the standard error given by the Central Limit Theorem, using the sample proportion as an estimate of the population proportion \(p\). Proportion of home team wins in soccer, with \(n=120\) and \(\hat{p}=0.583\)

Metal Tags on Penguins and Survival Data 1.3 on page 10 discusses a study designed to test whether applying metal tags is detrimental to penguins. One variable examined is the survival rate 10 years after tagging. The scientists observed that 10 of the 50 metal tagged penguins survived, compared to 18 of the 50 electronic tagged penguins. Construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in proportion surviving between the metal and electronic tagged penguins \(\left(p_{M}-p_{E}\right)\). Interpret the result.

We saw in Exercise 6.221 on page 466 that drinking tea appears to offer a strong boost to the immune system. In a study extending the results of the study described in that exercise, \(^{58}\) blood samples were taken on five participants before and after one week of drinking about five cups of tea a day (the participants did not drink tea before the study started). The before and after blood samples were exposed to e. coli bacteria, and production of interferon gamma, a molecule that fights bacteria, viruses, and tumors, was measured. Mean production went from \(155 \mathrm{pg} / \mathrm{mL}\) before tea drinking to \(448 \mathrm{pg} / \mathrm{mL}\) after tea drinking. The mean difference for the five subjects is \(293 \mathrm{pg} / \mathrm{mL}\) with a standard deviation in the differences of \(242 .\) The paper implies that the use of the t-distribution is appropriate. (a) Why is it appropriate to use paired data in this analysis? (b) Find and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the mean increase in production of interferon gamma after drinking tea for one week.

Dark Chocolate for Good Health A study \(^{47}\) examines chocolate's effects on blood vessel function in healthy people. In the randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled study, 11 people received 46 grams (1.6 ounces) of dark chocolate (which is naturally flavonoid-rich) every day for two weeks, while a control group of 10 people received a placebo consisting of dark chocolate with low flavonoid content. Participants had their vascular health measured (by means of flow-mediated dilation) before and after the two-week study. The increase over the two-week period was measured, with larger numbers indicating greater vascular health. For the group getting the good dark chocolate, the mean increase was 1.3 with a standard deviation of \(2.32,\) while the control group had a mean change of -0.96 with a standard deviation of 1.58 . (a) Explain what "randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study" means. (b) Find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in means between the two groups. Be sure to clearly define the parameters you are estimating. You may assume that neither sample shows significant departures from normality. (c) Is it plausible that there is "no difference" between the two kinds of chocolate? Justify your answer using the confidence interval found in \(\operatorname{part}(\mathrm{b})\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free