Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Close Confidants and Social Networking Sites Exercise 6.93 introduces a study \(^{48}\) in which 2006 randomly selected US adults (age 18 or older) were asked to give the number of people in the last six months "with whom you discussed matters that are important to you." The average number of close confidants for the full sample was \(2.2 .\) In addition, the study asked participants whether or not they had a profile on a social networking site. For the 947 participants using a social networking site, the average number of close confidants was 2.5 with a standard deviation of 1.4 , and for the other 1059 participants who do not use a social networking site, the average was 1.9 with a standard deviation of \(1.3 .\) Find and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in means between the two groups.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The 90% confidence interval for the difference in means between the group using social networking sites and the group not using social networking sites is given by (x̄1 - x̄2) - ME to (x̄1 - x̄2) + ME. Substitute the calculated values of x̄1, x̄2 and ME in the formula.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the data

Identify the sample sizes, means, and standard deviations for each group. For the group using a social networking site, the sample size (n1) is 947, the mean (x̄1) is 2.5, and the standard deviation (s1) is 1.4. For the group not using a social networking site, the sample size (n2) is 1059, the mean (x̄2) is 1.9, and the standard deviation (s2) is 1.3.
02

Calculate the standard error

The standard error (SE) of the difference in sample means can be calculated using the formula: SE = sqrt[ (s1²/n1) + (s2²/n2) ] = sqrt[ (1.4²/947) + (1.3²/1059) ].
03

Find the critical value

For a 90% confidence level, the critical value for t is the t-score with 90% of the distribution's area lying between -t and +t from a t-distribution table. With large sample sizes, t approximates the z-score, which for 90% confidence interval is 1.645. You can also use a calculator or statistics software to find the exact t value.
04

Calculate the margin of error

The Margin of error (ME) can be calculated using the formula: ME = t * SE. Substitute the calculated values of t and SE in the formula.
05

Find the confidence interval

The confidence interval is the difference in sample means (x̄1 - x̄2) plus and minus the margin of error. So, calculate (x̄1 - x̄2) - ME and (x̄1 - x̄2) + ME.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Standard Error
In the realm of statistics, the Standard Error (SE) is a measure that tells us how far we can expect a sample statistic to deviate from the true population parameter. For example, when dealing with differences between two sample means, as in the textbook exercise, the standard error helps gauge the variability or uncertainty of this difference.

In the exercise, students calculated the standard error of the difference in sample means between two groups. To be more precise, the formula used is: \[\text{SE} = \sqrt{\left(\frac{s1^2}{n1}\right) + \left(\frac{s2^2}{n2}\right)}\]where \(s1\) and \(s2\) represent standard deviations of the two samples, and \(n1\) and \(n2\) are the respective sample sizes. Simplifying complex formulas and demystifying them is key. By understanding that the standard error essentially provides an estimate of the 'standard' distance between our estimated difference and the true difference in populations, students can better grasp the concept.
Margin of Error
Delving into the concept of Margin of Error (ME), we uncover the range within which we expect the true parameter to lie, given the sample statistics. It's a cushion that accounts for sampling variability. In the exercise, the margin of error is an essential piece of the confidence interval puzzle, as it defines the width of the interval around the sample means' difference.

To calculate it, the formula used is: \[\text{ME} = t \times \text{SE}\]This incorporates the standard error (SE) and multiplies it by a critical value from the t-distribution, labeled as \(t\). This critical value is essentially a multiplier that ensures the confidence interval spans a range that includes the true mean difference with a specific level of confidence, in this case, 90%. It's crucial to convey that the margin of error reflects how much we would expect our estimate to vary if we were to take multiple samples.
T-distribution
Moving on to the t-distribution, this is a probability distribution that estimates the population parameters when the sample size is small and/or the population standard deviation is unknown. It resembles the normal distribution but has heavier tails, meaning it predicts more variability. In the context of the exercise, it's used to find the critical value (\(t\)) that helps define the edges of our confidence interval.

Students must understand that as sample sizes increase, the t-distribution becomes more like the normal distribution. This concept, often represented as a bell-shaped curve, is critical when making inferences about a population based on sample data. We use this distribution to capture the uncertainty of the mean estimate, which then helps calculate the margin of error, and the overall confidence interval.
Sample Means Difference
Finally, let's touch upon the Sample Means Difference. In studies comparing two groups, researchers often investigate whether there's a significant difference between the groups' averages. This exercise illustrates such a scenario, comparing the number of close confidants between social media users and non-users.

The difference is computed simply as \[(x̄1 - x̄2)\]A positive result indicates that the first group has a higher mean, while a negative means the second group does. But how sure can we be that this sample difference reflects the true difference in populations? Confidence intervals calculated from margins of error and standard errors allow us to state this difference with a level of certainty. It's important for students to not just calculate these values but to interpret them—understanding that a confidence interval that does not contain zero suggests a statistically significant difference between the groups.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 6.32 and 6.33, find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion two ways: using StatKey or other technology and percentiles from a bootstrap distribution, and using the normal distribution and the formula for standard error. Compare the results. Proportion of home team wins in soccer, using \(\hat{p}=0.583\) with \(n=120\)

Use a t-distribution and the given matched pair sample results to complete the test of the given hypotheses. Assume the results come from random samples, and if the sample sizes are small, assume the underlying distribution of the differences is relatively normal. Assume that differences are computed using \(d=x_{1}-x_{2}\). Test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1} \neq \mu_{2}\) using the paired difference sample results \(\bar{x}_{d}=-2.6, s_{d}=4.1\) \(n_{d}=18\)

\(\mathbf{6 . 2 2 0}\) Diet Cola and Calcium Exercise B.3 on page 349 introduces a study examining the effect of diet cola consumption on calcium levels in women. A sample of 16 healthy women aged 18 to 40 were randomly assigned to drink 24 ounces of either diet cola or water. Their urine was collected for three hours after ingestion of the beverage and calcium excretion (in \(\mathrm{mg}\) ) was measured. The summary statistics for diet cola are \(\bar{x}_{C}=56.0\) with \(s_{C}=4.93\) and \(n_{C}=8\) and the summary statistics for water are \(\bar{x}_{W}=49.1\) with \(s_{W}=3.64\) and \(n_{W}=8 .\) Figure 6.20 shows dotplots of the data values. Test whether there is evidence that diet cola leaches calcium out of the system, which would increase the amount of calcium in the urine for diet cola drinkers. In Exercise \(\mathrm{B} .3\), we used a randomization distribution to conduct this test. Use a t-distribution here, after first checking that the conditions are met and explaining your reasoning. The data are stored in ColaCalcium.

Use a t-distribution and the given matched pair sample results to complete the test of the given hypotheses. Assume the results come from random samples, and if the sample sizes are small, assume the underlying distribution of the differences is relatively normal. Assume that differences are computed using \(d=x_{1}-x_{2}\). Test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}>\mu_{2}\) using the paired data in the following table: $$ \begin{array}{lllllllllll} \hline \text { Situation } & 1 & 125 & 156 & 132 & 175 & 153 & 148 & 180 & 135 & 168 & 157 \\ \text { Situation } & 2 & 120 & 145 & 142 & 150 & 160 & 148 & 160 & 142 & 162 & 150 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Effect of Splitting the Bill Exercise 2.153 on page 105 describes a study to compare the cost of restaurant meals when people pay individually versus splitting the bill as a group. In the experiment half of the people were told they would each be responsible for individual meal costs and the other half were told the cost would be split equally among the six people at the table. The 24 people paying individually had a mean cost of 37.29 Israeli shekels with a standard deviation of 12.54 , while the 24 people splitting the bill had a higher mean cost of 50.92 Israeli shekels with a standard deviation of 14.33. The raw data can be found in SplitBill and both distributions are reasonably bell-shaped. Use this information to find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean meal cost between these two situations.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free