Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Examine the results of a study \(^{45}\) investigating whether fast food consumption increases one's concentration of phthalates, an ingredient in plastics that has been linked to multiple health problems including hormone disruption. The study included 8,877 people who recorded all the food they ate over a 24 -hour period and then provided a urine sample. Two specific phthalate byproducts were measured (in \(\mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL}\) ) in the urine: DEHP and DiNP. Find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference, \(\mu_{F}-\mu_{N},\) in mean concentration between people who have eaten fast food in the last 24 hours and those who haven't. The mean concentration of DiNP in the 3095 participants who had eaten fast food was \(\bar{x}_{F}=10.1\) with \(s_{F}=38.9\) while the mean for the 5782 participants who had not eaten fast food was \(\bar{x}_{N}=7.0\) with \(s_{N}=22.8\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The 95% confidence interval for the difference in the mean concentration of DiNP between people who have eaten fast food and those who haven't is calculated using data from the study. The interval is computed using the provided sample means and standard deviations, following the steps of standard error calculation, margin of error calculation and finally constructing the confidence interval.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the data

First, let's identify the data given. We have \(n_{F}=3095\) (number of people who have eaten fast food), \(\bar{x}_{F}=10.1\) (mean concentration of DiNP for people who have eaten fast food) and \(s_{F}=38.9\) (standard deviation for people who have eaten fast food). Similarly, we have \(n_{N}=5782\) (number of people who have not eaten fast food), \(\bar{x}_{N}=7.0\) (mean concentration of DiNP for people who have not eaten fast food) and \(s_{N}=22.8\) (standard deviation for people who have not eaten fast food).
02

Calculate the Standard Error (SE)

The standard error (SE) for difference of means is calculated by the formula \(\sqrt{\(s_{F}^{2} / n_{F}\) + \(s_{N}^{2} / n_{N}\)}\). First calculate \(s_{F}^{2} / n_{F}\) and \(s_{N}^{2} / n_{N}\) separately and then sum those values. The square root of that value gives the standard error. Substitute the values into the formula to get the standard error.
03

Find the Margin of Error

Next, we need to find the margin of error for a 95% confidence interval. This is given by the z-score times the standard error (SE). For a 95% confidence interval, the z-score (which we get from the standard normal distribution) is approximately 1.96. Thus, the margin of error is 1.96 times the standard error.
04

Construct the Confidence Interval

Finally, we can construct the 95% confidence interval for the difference in means, which is \((\mu_{F} - \mu_{N})\), by taking the difference in sample means (\(\bar{x}_{F} - \bar{x}_{N}\)) and adding and subtracting the margin of error. This will give us the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Who Exercises More: Males or Females? The dataset StudentSurvey has information from males and females on the number of hours spent exercising in a typical week. Computer output of descriptive statistics for the number of hours spent exercising, broken down by gender, is given: \(\begin{array}{l}\text { Descriptive Statistics: Exercise } \\ \text { Variable } & \text { Gender } & \mathrm{N} & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } \\\ \text { Exercise } & \mathrm{F} & 168 & 8.110 & 5.199 \\ & \mathrm{M} & 193 & 9.876 & 6.069\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{rrrrr}\text { Minimum } & \text { Q1 } & \text { Median } & \text { Q3 } & \text { Maximum } \\ 0.000 & 4.000 & 7.000 & 12.000 & 27.000 \\\ 0.000 & 5.000 & 10.000 & 14.000 & 40.000\end{array}\) (a) How many females are in the dataset? How many males? (b) In the sample, which group exercises more, on average? By how much? (c) Use the summary statistics to compute a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean number of hours spent exercising. Be sure to define any parameters you are estimating. (d) Compare the answer from part (c) to the confidence interval given in the following computer output for the same data: Two-sample \(\mathrm{T}\) for Exercise Gender N Mean StDev SE Mean \(\begin{array}{lllll}\mathrm{F} & 168 & 8.11 & 5.20 & 0.40 \\ \mathrm{M} & 193 & 9.88 & 6.07 & 0.44\end{array}\) Difference \(=\operatorname{mu}(F)-\operatorname{mu}(M)\) Estimate for difference: -1.766 \(95 \%\) Cl for difference: (-2.932,-0.599)

Use a t-distribution to find a confidence interval for the difference in means \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) using the relevant sample results from paired data. Give the best estimate for \(\mu_{1}-\) \(\mu_{2},\) the margin of error, and the confidence interval. Assume the results come from random samples from populations that are approximately normally distributed, and that differences are computed using \(d=x_{1}-x_{2}\) A \(99 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) using the paired data in the following table:. $$ \begin{array}{lccccc} \hline \text { Case } & \mathbf{1} & \mathbf{2} & \mathbf{3} & \mathbf{4} & \mathbf{5} \\ \hline \text { Treatment 1 } & 22 & 28 & 31 & 25 & 28 \\ \text { Treatment 2 } & 18 & 30 & 25 & 21 & 21 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

What Gives a Small P-value? In each case below, two sets of data are given for a two-tail difference in means test. In each case, which version gives a smaller \(\mathrm{p}\) -value relative to the other? (a) Both options have the same standard deviations and same sample sizes but: Option 1 has: \(\quad \bar{x}_{1}=25 \quad \bar{x}_{2}=23\) $$ \text { Option } 2 \text { has: } \quad \bar{x}_{1}=25 \quad \bar{x}_{2}=11 $$ (b) Both options have the same means \(\left(\bar{x}_{1}=22,\right.\) \(\left.\bar{x}_{2}=17\right)\) and same sample sizes but: Option 1 has: \(\quad s_{1}=15 \quad s_{2}=14\) $$ \text { Option } 2 \text { has: } \quad s_{1}=3 \quad s_{2}=4 $$ (c) Both options have the same means \(\left(\bar{x}_{1}=22,\right.\) \(\left.\bar{x}_{2}=17\right)\) and same standard deviations but: Option 1 has: \(\quad n_{1}=800 \quad n_{2}=1000\) $$ \text { Option } 2 \text { has: } \quad n_{1}=25 \quad n_{2}=30 $$

Effect of Splitting the Bill Exercise 2.153 on page 105 describes a study to compare the cost of restaurant meals when people pay individually versus splitting the bill as a group. In the experiment half of the people were told they would each be responsible for individual meal costs and the other half were told the cost would be split equally among the six people at the table. The 24 people paying individually had a mean cost of 37.29 Israeli shekels with a standard deviation of 12.54 , while the 24 people splitting the bill had a higher mean cost of 50.92 Israeli shekels with a standard deviation of 14.33. The raw data can be found in SplitBill and both distributions are reasonably bell-shaped. Use this information to find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean meal cost between these two situations.

Use a t-distribution and the given matched pair sample results to complete the test of the given hypotheses. Assume the results come from random samples, and if the sample sizes are small, assume the underlying distribution of the differences is relatively normal. Assume that differences are computed using \(d=x_{1}-x_{2}\). Test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}<\mu_{2}\) using the paired data in the following table: $$ \begin{array}{lllllllll} \hline \text { Treatment } 1 & 16 & 12 & 18 & 21 & 15 & 11 & 14 & 22 \\ \text { Treatment } 2 & 18 & 20 & 25 & 21 & 19 & 8 & 15 & 20 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free