Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Autism and Maternal Antidepressant Use A recent study \(^{41}\) compared 298 children with Autism Spectrum Disorder to 1507 randomly selected control children without the disorder. Of the children with autism, 20 of the mothers had used antidepressant drugs during the year before pregnancy or the first trimester of pregnancy. Of the control children, 50 of the mothers had used the drugs. (a) Is there a significant association between prenatal exposure to antidepressant medicine and the risk of autism? Test whether the results are significant at the \(5 \%\) level. (b) Can we conclude that prenatal exposure to antidepressant medicine increases the risk of autism in the child? Why or why not? (c) The article describing the study contains the sentence "No increase in risk was found for mothers with a history of mental health treatment in the absence of prenatal exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [antidepressants]." Why did the researchers conduct this extra analysis?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The detailed conclusion will depend on the results after performing the Chi-square test in Step 3 and Step 4. Depending on those results, you will decide whether or not there is a significant association between antidepressant use and autism and interpret what this means in the context of the study. As for the additional analysis the researchers performed, it was likely done to control for the potential confounding effect of the mother's psychiatric condition and provide a more accurate picture of the association between autism risk and antidepressant use.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate Hypotheses

Two hypotheses will need to be formulated. Null hypothesis (\(H_o\)): There is no significant association between prenatal exposure to antidepressant medicine and the risk of autism. Alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)): There is a significant association between prenatal exposure to antidepressants and the risk of autism.
02

Collect and Arrange Data

The data are already given in the problem. Arrange them into a two-by-two contingency table which will show the relation between autism and maternal antidepressant use.
03

Perform Chi-Square Test

Calculate your observed chi-square statistic using the chi-square formula, and determine the degrees of freedom (df), which is given by \((R-1)*(C-1)\) where R and C are the number of rows and columns. Then, find the critical value from chi-square distribution table with (df=1) at the \(5 \%\) level of significance.
04

Make a Decision

If observed chi-square value is greater than critical value, we reject the null hypothesis, else we will accept the null hypothesis.
05

Interpret the Results

This will conclude whether there is a significant association between prenatal exposure to antidepressant medicine and the risk of autism. Then, for question (b), infer as to whether prenatal exposure to antidepressant medicine increases the risk of autism in the child based on the results from Step 4.
06

Discuss the Extra Analysis

For question (c), discuss why the researchers conducted this extra analysis, taking into consideration the broader context of the study. Typically, such an analysis is performed to provide more precise and less confounded estimates of the association between maternal antidepressant use and autism risk by adjusting for the potential confounding effect of maternal psychiatric condition.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Does Red Increase Men's Attraction to Women? Exercise 1.99 on page 44 described a study \(^{46}\) which examines the impact of the color red on how attractive men perceive women to be. In the study, men were randomly divided into two groups and were asked to rate the attractiveness of women on a scale of 1 (not at all attractive) to 9 (extremely attractive). Men in one group were shown pictures of women on a white background while the men in the other group were shown the same pictures of women on a red background. The results are shown in Table 6.14 and the data for both groups are reasonably symmetric with no outliers. To determine the possible effect size of the red background over the white, find and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean attractiveness rating.

In Exercises 6.32 and 6.33, find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion two ways: using StatKey or other technology and percentiles from a bootstrap distribution, and using the normal distribution and the formula for standard error. Compare the results. Proportion of home team wins in soccer, using \(\hat{p}=0.583\) with \(n=120\)

Use a t-distribution to find a confidence interval for the difference in means \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) using the relevant sample results from paired data. Give the best estimate for \(\mu_{1}-\) \(\mu_{2},\) the margin of error, and the confidence interval. Assume the results come from random samples from populations that are approximately normally distributed, and that differences are computed using \(d=x_{1}-x_{2}\). A \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) using the paired difference sample results \(\bar{x}_{d}=556.9, s_{d}=\) \(143.6, n_{d}=100\)

Use a t-distribution and the given matched pair sample results to complete the test of the given hypotheses. Assume the results come from random samples, and if the sample sizes are small, assume the underlying distribution of the differences is relatively normal. Assume that differences are computed using \(d=x_{1}-x_{2}\). Test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}>\mu_{2}\) using the paired data in the following table: $$ \begin{array}{lllllllllll} \hline \text { Situation } & 1 & 125 & 156 & 132 & 175 & 153 & 148 & 180 & 135 & 168 & 157 \\ \text { Situation } & 2 & 120 & 145 & 142 & 150 & 160 & 148 & 160 & 142 & 162 & 150 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

A data collection method is described to investigate a difference in means. In each case, determine which data analysis method is more appropriate: paired data difference in means or difference in means with two separate groups. In a study to determine whether the color red increases how attractive men find women, one group of men rate the attractiveness of a woman after seeing her picture on a red background and another group of men rate the same woman after seeing her picture on a white background.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free