Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Metal Tags on Penguins and Survival Data 1.3 on page 10 discusses a study designed to test whether applying metal tags is detrimental to penguins. One variable examined is the survival rate 10 years after tagging. The scientists observed that 10 of the 50 metal tagged penguins survived, compared to 18 of the 50 electronic tagged penguins. Construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in proportion surviving between the metal and electronic tagged penguins \(\left(p_{M}-p_{E}\right)\). Interpret the result.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in survival proportions between metal-tagged and electronic-tagged penguins is \([-0.30945, -0.05054]\).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Proportions

First, calculate the proportions of surviving penguins for both groups. This can be done by dividing the number of survivors in each group by the total number of individuals in that group: \n\[\hat{p_{M}} = \frac{10}{50} = 0.2\] and\n\[\hat{p_{E}} = \frac{18}{50} = 0.36\]
02

Compute the Standard Error

Next, calculate the standard error using the following formula: \n\[\sqrt{\frac{\hat{p_{M}} \cdot (1-\hat{p_{M}})}{n_{M}} + \frac{\hat{p_{E}} \cdot (1-\hat{p_{E}})}{n_{E}}} = \sqrt{\frac{0.2 \cdot 0.8}{50} + \frac{0.36 \cdot 0.64}{50}} = 0.09173...\]
03

Determine the Critical Value

Then find the critical value from the standard normal distribution that corresponds to the midpoint of the desired \(90 \%\) confidence interval. The critical value \( z_{\alpha / 2} = 1.645\) for a \(90 \%\) confidence interval.
04

Construct the Confidence Interval

Finally, construct the difference's confidence interval by adding and subtracting the critical value times the standard error from the difference in survival rates: \n\[\hat{p_{M}} - \hat{p_{E}} \pm z_{\alpha /2} * SE = 0.2 - 0.36 \pm 1.645 * 0.09173 = [-0.30945, -0.05054]\]
05

Interpret the Results

Interpretation of the confidence interval says that with \(90 \%\) confidence, the true difference in survival proportion between metal-tagged penguins and electronic-tagged penguins lies between \(-0.30945\) and \(-0.05054\). This interval does not include zero, suggesting that there may be a real difference in survival rates between the two tagging groups, with the electronic-tagged penguins surviving at a higher rate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Survival in the ICU and Infection In the dataset ICUAdmissions, the variable Status indicates whether the ICU (Intensive Care Unit) patient lived (0) or died \((1),\) while the variable Infection indicates whether the patient had an infection ( 1 for yes, 0 for no) at the time of admission to the ICU. Use technology to find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the proportion who die between those with an infection and those without.

Split the Bill? Exercise 2.153 on page 105 describes a study to compare the cost of restaurant meals when people pay individually versus splitting the bill as a group. In the experiment half of the people were told they would each be responsible for individual meal costs and the other half were told the cost would be split equally among the six people at the table. The data in SplitBill includes the cost of what each person ordered (in Israeli shekels) and the payment method (Individual or Split). Some summary statistics are provided in Table 6.20 and both distributions are reasonably bell-shaped. Use this information to test (at a \(5 \%\) level ) if there is evidence that the mean cost is higher when people split the bill. You may have done this test using randomizations in Exercise 4.118 on page 302 .

In Exercises 6.32 and 6.33, find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion two ways: using StatKey or other technology and percentiles from a bootstrap distribution, and using the normal distribution and the formula for standard error. Compare the results. Proportion of home team wins in soccer, using \(\hat{p}=0.583\) with \(n=120\)

As part of the same study described in Exercise 6.254 , the researchers also were interested in whether babies preferred singing or speech. Forty-eight of the original fifty infants were exposed to both singing and speech by the same woman. Interest was again measured by the amount of time the baby looked at the woman while she made noise. In this case the mean time while speaking was 66.97 with a standard deviation of \(43.42,\) and the mean for singing was 56.58 with a standard deviation of 31.57 seconds. The mean of the differences was 10.39 more seconds for the speaking treatment with a standard deviation of 55.37 seconds. Perform the appropriate test to determine if this is sufficient evidence to conclude that babies have a preference (either way) between speaking and singing.

We examine the effect of different inputs on determining the sample size needed. Find the sample size needed to give, with \(95 \%\) confidence, a margin of error within ±3 , if the estimated standard deviation is \(\tilde{\sigma}=100\). If the estimated standard deviation is \(\tilde{\sigma}=50\). If the estimated standard deviation is \(\tilde{\sigma}=10 .\) Comment on how the variability in the population influences the sample size needed to reach a desired level of accuracy.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free