Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Number of Fouls in a Season by NBA Players The variable Fouls in the dataset NBAPlayers2015 shows the total number of fouls during the \(2014-2015\) season for all players in the \(\mathrm{NBA}\) (National Basketball Association) who played at least 24 minutes per game that season. We use this group as a sample of all NBA players in all seasons who play regularly. Use this information to test whether there is evidence that NBA players who play regularly have a mean number of fouls in a season less than 160 (or roughly 2 fouls per game).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The answer requires calculations that aren't given in the problem, like the sample mean and standard deviation of fouls. However, the outlined steps guide how to perform a one-sample t-test given those values and test the hypotheses that the mean number of fouls per NBA player per season is less than 160.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is that the population mean (\(\mu\)) foul rate for regular NBA players is 160 fouls per season. The alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) is that the population mean foul rate is less than 160. In mathematical terms: \(H_0: \mu = 160\), \(H_a: \mu < 160\).
02

Choose a Significance Level

The common significance level is \(\alpha = 0.05\). This means there is a 5% chance of rejecting the null hypothesis when it's true.
03

Calculate Sample Mean and Standard Deviation

Use the given dataset to calculate the sample mean (\(\bar{x}\)) and sample standard deviation (\(s\)). This will help in calculating the t-score later.
04

Conduct T-test and Evaluate the P-value

With the sample mean, standard deviation, sample size, and assumed population mean, calculate the t-value using the formula: \(t = (\bar{x} - \mu) / (s/ \sqrt{n})\). Then, look up the associated p-value for the calculated t-value in a t-distribution table or by using statistical software.
05

Interpret the Results

If the p-value is less than the significance level (0.05), we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. This would mean that there's evidence that NBA players who play regularly commit less than 160 fouls per season on average. If the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, suggesting there's not enough evidence to suggest that the average number of fouls is less than 160.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For each scenario, use the formula to find the standard error of the distribution of differences in sample means, \(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\) Samples of size 100 from Population 1 with mean 87 and standard deviation 12 and samples of size 80 from Population 2 with mean 81 and standard deviation 15

Who Watches More TV: Males or Females? The dataset StudentSurvey has information from males and females on the number of hours spent watching television in a typical week. Computer output of descriptive statistics for the number of hours spent watching TV, broken down by gender, is given: \(\begin{array}{l}\text { Descriptive Statistics: TV } \\ \text { Variable } & \text { Gender } & \mathrm{N} & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } \\ \text { TV } & \mathrm{F} & 169 & 5.237 & 4.100 \\ & \mathrm{M} & 192 & 7.620 & 6.427 \\\ \text { Minimum } & \mathrm{Q} 1 & \text { Median } & \mathrm{Q} 3 & \text { Maximum } \\ & 0.000 & 2.500 & 4.000 & 6.000 & 20.000 \\ & 0.000 & 3.000 & 5.000 & 10.000 & 40.000\end{array}\) (a) In the sample, which group watches more TV, on average? By how much? (b) Use the summary statistics to compute a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean number of hours spent watching TV. Be sure to define any parameters you are estimating. (c) Compare the answer from part (c) to the confidence interval given in the following computer output for the same data: \(\begin{array}{l}\text { Two-sample T for TV } \\ \text { Gender } & \text { N } & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } & \text { SE Mean } \\ \mathrm{F} & 169 & 5.24 & 4.10 & 0.32 \\ \mathrm{M} & 192 & 7.62 & 6.43 & 0.46 \\ \text { Difference } & =\mathrm{mu}(\mathrm{F})-\mathrm{mu}(\mathrm{M}) & & \end{array}\) Estimate for for difference: -2.383 r difference: (-3.836,-0.930) \(99 \% \mathrm{Cl}\) for (d) Interpret the confidence interval in context.

Using Data 5.1 on page \(375,\) we find a significant difference in the proportion of fruit flies surviving after 13 days between those eating organic potatoes and those eating conventional (not organic) potatoes. Exercises 6.166 to 6.169 ask you to conduct a hypothesis test using additional data from this study. \(^{40}\) In every case, we are testing $$\begin{array}{ll}H_{0}: & p_{o}=p_{c} \\\H_{a}: & p_{o}>p_{c}\end{array}$$ where \(p_{o}\) and \(p_{c}\) represent the proportion of fruit flies alive at the end of the given time frame of those eating organic food and those eating conventional food, respectively. Also, in every case, we have \(n_{1}=n_{2}=500 .\) Show all remaining details in the test, using a \(5 \%\) significance level. Effect of Organic Raisins after 15 Days After 15 days, 320 of the 500 fruit flies eating organic raisins are still alive, while 300 of the 500 eating conventional raisins are still alive.

Find the endpoints of the t-distribution with \(5 \%\) beyond them in each tail if the samples have sizes \(n_{1}=8\) and \(n_{2}=10\)

Effect of Splitting the Bill Exercise 2.153 on page 105 describes a study to compare the cost of restaurant meals when people pay individually versus splitting the bill as a group. In the experiment half of the people were told they would each be responsible for individual meal costs and the other half were told the cost would be split equally among the six people at the table. The 24 people paying individually had a mean cost of 37.29 Israeli shekels with a standard deviation of 12.54 , while the 24 people splitting the bill had a higher mean cost of 50.92 Israeli shekels with a standard deviation of 14.33. The raw data can be found in SplitBill and both distributions are reasonably bell-shaped. Use this information to find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean meal cost between these two situations.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free