Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

6.127 Team Batting Average in Baseball The dataset BaseballHits gives 2014 season statistics for all Major League Baseball teams. We treat this as a sample of all MLB teams in all years. Computer output of descriptive statistics for the variable giving the batting average is shown: Descriptive Statistics: BattingAvg \(\begin{array}{rrrr}\mathrm{N} & \text { Mean } & \text { SE Mean } & \text { StDev } \\ 30 & 0.25110 & 0.00200 & 0.01096\end{array}\) Variable BattingAvg \(\begin{array}{rrrrr}\text { Minimum } & \text { Q1 } & \text { Median } & \text { Q3 } & \text { Maximum } \\ 0.22600 & 0.24350 & 0.25300 & 0.25675 & 0.27700\end{array}\) (a) How many teams are included in the dataset? What is the mean batting average? What is the standard deviation? (b) Use the descriptive statistics above to conduct a hypothesis test to determine whether there is evidence that average team batting average is different from 0.260 . Show all details of the test. (c) Compare the test statistic and p-value you found in part (b) to the computer output below for the same data: One-Sample T: BattingAvg Test of \(m u=0.26\) vs not \(=0.26\) \(\begin{array}{lrrr}\text { Variable } & \text { N } & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } \\ \text { BattingAvg } & 30 & 0.25110 & 0.01096 \\ \text { SE Mean } & 95 \% \text { Cl } & \text { T } & \text { P } \\ 0.00200 & \\{0.24701,0.25519) & -4.45 & 0.000\end{array}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The dataset includes statistics from 30 teams. The mean batting average is \(0.25110\) while the standard deviation is \(0.01096\). By conducting a hypothesis test, it was found that the mean batting average was significantly different from \(0.260\) with a t-value of \(-4.475372208025383\) and a p-value lower than \(0.05\), as seen from both manually conducted analysis and the computer output presented.

Step by step solution

01

Interpret Descriptive Statistics

The descriptive statistics table provides us with various pieces of information, including number of teams (\(N=30\)), mean batting average (\(0.25110\)), standard deviation (\(0.01096\)), minimum batting average (\(0.22600\)), first quartile (\(0.24350\)), median (\(0.25300\)), third quartile (\(0.25675\)), and maximum batting average (\(0.27700\)).
02

Conduct Hypothesis Test

We conduct a hypothesis test to determine whether there is evidence that average team batting average differs from \(0.260\). The null hypothesis is that the mean team batting average is equal to \(0.260\) (\(H0: \mu = 0.260\)), and the alternative hypothesis is that it differs (\(H1: \mu ≠ 0.260\)). The test statistic is calculated using the formula \(t = \frac{ (\bar{x}- \mu) }{ \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} }\), where \(\bar{x}\) = sample mean, \(\mu\) = population mean, \(s\) = standard deviation, and \(n\) = number of observations. Inserting the values, the test statistic \(t = \frac{(0.25110 - 0.260)}{0.01096/\sqrt{30}} = -4.475372208025383\). The exact p-value cannot be calculated without additional statistical tables or software, but we know it will be very small since the magnitude of the t-score is quite large.
03

Compare to Computer Output

Comparing our calculated t-value with the computer output, we can see that our manually calculated t-value matches the one calculated by the computer (\(-4.475372208025383\) approx to \(-4.45\)). The p-value reported in the computer output is \(0.000\), providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis. This indicates that the mean batting average is significantly different from \(0.260\) with a confidence level of \(95\%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Metal Tags on Penguins and Breeding Success Data 1.3 on page 10 discusses a study designed to test whether applying metal tags is detrimental to penguins. Exercise 6.148 investigates the survival rate of the penguins. The scientists also studied the breeding success of the metal- and electronic-tagged penguins. Metal-tagged penguins successfully produced offspring in \(32 \%\) of the 122 total breeding seasons, while the electronic-tagged penguins succeeded in \(44 \%\) of the 160 total breeding seasons. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in proportion successfully producing offspring \(\left(p_{M}-p_{E}\right)\). Interpret the result.

When we want \(95 \%\) confidence and use the conservative estimate of \(p=0.5,\) we can use the simple formula \(n=1 /(M E)^{2}\) to estimate the sample size needed for a given margin of error ME. In Exercises 6.40 to 6.43, use this formula to determine the sample size needed for the given margin of error. A margin of error of 0.04 .

Can Malaria Parasites Control Mosquito Behavior? Are malaria parasites able to control mosquito behavior to their advantage? A study \(^{43}\) investigated this question by taking mosquitos and giving them the opportunity to have their first "blood meal" from a mouse. The mosquitoes were randomized to either eat from a mouse infected with malaria or an uninfected mouse. At several time points after this, mosquitoes were put into a cage with a human and it was recorded whether or not each mosquito approached the human (presumably to bite, although mosquitoes were caught before biting). Once infected, the malaria parasites in the mosquitoes go through two stages: the Oocyst stage in which the mosquito has been infected but is not yet infectious to others and then the Sporozoite stage in which the mosquito is infectious to others. Malaria parasites would benefit if mosquitoes sought risky blood meals (such as biting a human) less often in the Oocyst stage (because mosquitos are often killed while attempting a blood meal) and more often in the Sporozoite stage after becoming infectious (because this is one of the primary ways in which malaria is transmitted). Does exposing mosquitoes to malaria actually impact their behavior in this way? (a) In the Oocyst stage (after eating from mouse but before becoming infectious), 20 out of 113 mosquitoes in the group exposed to malaria approached the human and 36 out of 117 mosquitoes in the group not exposed to malaria approached the human. Calculate the Z-statistic. (b) Calculate the p-value for testing whether this provides evidence that the proportion of mosquitoes in the Oocyst stage approaching the human is lower in the group exposed to malaria. (c) In the Sporozoite stage (after becoming infectious), 37 out of 149 mosquitoes in the group exposed to malaria approached the human and 14 out of 144 mosquitoes in the group not exposed to malaria approached the human. Calculate the z-statistic. (d) Calculate the p-value for testing whether this provides evidence that the proportion of mosquitoes in the Sporozoite stage approaching the human is higher in the group exposed to malaria. (e) Based on your p-values, make conclusions about what you have learned about mosquito behavior, stage of infection, and exposure to malaria or not. (f) Can we conclude that being exposed to malaria (as opposed to not being exposed to malaria) causes these behavior changes in mosquitoes? Why or why not?

What Gives a Small P-value? In each case below, two sets of data are given for a two-tail difference in means test. In each case, which version gives a smaller \(\mathrm{p}\) -value relative to the other? (a) Both options have the same standard deviations and same sample sizes but: Option 1 has: \(\quad \bar{x}_{1}=25 \quad \bar{x}_{2}=23\) $$ \text { Option } 2 \text { has: } \quad \bar{x}_{1}=25 \quad \bar{x}_{2}=11 $$ (b) Both options have the same means \(\left(\bar{x}_{1}=22,\right.\) \(\left.\bar{x}_{2}=17\right)\) and same sample sizes but: Option 1 has: \(\quad s_{1}=15 \quad s_{2}=14\) $$ \text { Option } 2 \text { has: } \quad s_{1}=3 \quad s_{2}=4 $$ (c) Both options have the same means \(\left(\bar{x}_{1}=22,\right.\) \(\left.\bar{x}_{2}=17\right)\) and same standard deviations but: Option 1 has: \(\quad n_{1}=800 \quad n_{2}=1000\) $$ \text { Option } 2 \text { has: } \quad n_{1}=25 \quad n_{2}=30 $$

In Exercise 6.93 on page \(430,\) we see that the average number of close confidants in a random sample of 2006 US adults is 2.2 with a standard deviation of \(1.4 .\) If we want to estimate the number of close confidants with a margin of error within ±0.05 and with \(99 \%\) confidence, how large a sample is needed?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free