Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

6.122 Be Nice to Pigeons, As They Remember Your Face In a study \(^{30}\) conducted in Paris, France, equal amounts of pigeon feed were spread on the ground in two adjacent locations. A person was present in both sites, with one acting hostile and running at the birds to scare them away and the other acting neutral and just observing. The two people were randomly exchanged between the two sites throughout and the birds quickly learned to avoid the hostile person's site and to eat at the site of the neutral person. At the end of the training session, both people behaved neutrally but the birds continued to remember which one was hostile. In the most interesting part of the experiment, when the two people exchanged coats (orange worn by the hostile one and yellow by the neutral one throughout training), the pigeons were not fooled and continued to recognize and avoid the hostile person. The quantity measured is difference in number of pigeons at the neutral site minus the hostile site. With \(n=32\) measurements, the mean difference in number of pigeons is 3.9 with a standard deviation of 6.8 . Test to see if this provides evidence that the mean difference is greater than zero, meaning the pigeons can recognize faces (and hold a grudge!)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, the evidence shows that pigeons can recognize faces. Since the calculated t-score (3.37) is greater than the critical t-value (1.696), we reject the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the number of pigeons between the neutral site and the hostile site.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate Hypothesis

The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is that the mean difference, \(\mu\), equals zero (there is no difference in the number of pigeons between sites). The alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)) is that \(\mu\) is greater than zero (there are more pigeons at the neutral site than at the hostile one). So, \(H_0: \mu = 0\) and \(H_1: \mu > 0\).
02

Calculate t-score

The t-score is calculated as follows: \(t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu_0}{s / \sqrt{n}}\), where \(\bar{x}\) is the sample mean, \(\mu_0\) is the mean under the null hypothesis, \(s\) is the standard deviation and \(n\) is the sample size. Substituting the given information gives: \(t = \frac{3.9 - 0}{6.8 / \sqrt{32}} = 3.37.\)
03

Refer t-distribution Table

Refer a t-distribution table to find the critical t-value. As the sample size is 32, the degrees of freedom is \(n-1=31\), and if we test at a 5% level of significance for a one-tailed test, the critical t-value is approximately 1.696.
04

Compare t-scores and Draw Conclusion

Since the calculated t-score (3.37) is greater than the critical t-value (1.696), we reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, the provides evidence that pigeons can recognize faces (and hold a grudge!).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Plastic microparticles are contaminating the world's shorelines (see Exercise 6.108\()\), and much of this pollution appears to come from fibers from washing polyester clothes. \({ }^{27}\) The worst offender appears to be fleece, and a recent study found that the mean number of polyester fibers discharged into wastewater from washing fleece was 290 fibers per liter of wastewater, with a standard deviation of 87.6 and a sample size of 120 . (a) Find and interpret a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the mean number of polyester microfibers per liter of wastewater when washing fleece. (b) What is the margin of error? (c) If we want a margin of error of only ±5 with \(99 \%\) confidence, what sample size is needed?

Use StatKey or other technology to generate a bootstrap distribution of sample proportions and find the standard error for that distribution. Compare the result to the standard error given by the Central Limit Theorem, using the sample proportion as an estimate of the population proportion \(p\). Proportion of survey respondents who say exercise is important, with \(n=1000\) and \(\hat{p}=0.753\)

Dark Chocolate for Good Health A study \(^{47}\) examines chocolate's effects on blood vessel function in healthy people. In the randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled study, 11 people received 46 grams (1.6 ounces) of dark chocolate (which is naturally flavonoid-rich) every day for two weeks, while a control group of 10 people received a placebo consisting of dark chocolate with low flavonoid content. Participants had their vascular health measured (by means of flow-mediated dilation) before and after the two-week study. The increase over the two-week period was measured, with larger numbers indicating greater vascular health. For the group getting the good dark chocolate, the mean increase was 1.3 with a standard deviation of \(2.32,\) while the control group had a mean change of -0.96 with a standard deviation of 1.58 . (a) Explain what "randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study" means. (b) Find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in means between the two groups. Be sure to clearly define the parameters you are estimating. You may assume that neither sample shows significant departures from normality. (c) Is it plausible that there is "no difference" between the two kinds of chocolate? Justify your answer using the confidence interval found in \(\operatorname{part}(\mathrm{b})\)

Use a t-distribution and the given matched pair sample results to complete the test of the given hypotheses. Assume the results come from random samples, and if the sample sizes are small, assume the underlying distribution of the differences is relatively normal. Assume that differences are computed using \(d=x_{1}-x_{2}\). Test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1} \neq \mu_{2}\) using the paired difference sample results \(\bar{x}_{d}=15.7, s_{d}=12.2\) \(n_{d}=25 .\)

Metal Tags on Penguins and Arrival Dates Data 1.3 on page 10 discusses a study designed to test whether applying a metal tag is detrimental to a penguin, as opposed to applying an electronic tag. One variable examined is the date penguins arrive at the breeding site, with later arrivals hurting breeding success. Arrival date is measured as the number of days after November \(1^{\text {st }}\). Mean arrival date for the 167 times metal-tagged penguins arrived was December \(7^{\text {th }}\left(37\right.\) days after November \(\left.1^{\text {st }}\right)\) with a standard deviation of 38.77 days, while mean arrival date for the 189 times electronic-tagged penguins arrived at the breeding site was November \(21^{\text {st }}(21\) days after November \(\left.1^{\text {st }}\right)\) with a standard deviation of \(27.50 .\) Do these data provide evidence that metal tagged penguins have a later mean arrival time? Show all details of the test.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free