Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The Autistic Brain Autistic children often have a small head circumference at birth, followed by a sudden and excessive increase in head circumference during the first year of life. A recent study \(^{29}\) examined the brain tissue in autopsies of seven autistic male children between the ages of 2 and 16. The mean number of neurons in the prefrontal cortex in non-autistic male children of the same age is about 1.15 billion. The prefrontal cortex is the part of the brain most disrupted in autism, as it deals with language and social communication. In the sample of seven autistic children, the mean number of neurons in the prefrontal cortex was 1.94 billion with a standard deviation of 0.50 billion. The values in the sample are not heavily skewed. Use the t-distribution to test whether this sample provides evidence that autistic male children have more neurons (on average) in the prefrontal cortex than non-autistic children. (This study indicates that the causes of autism may be present before birth.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The answer would be dependent on the calculated t-value and the critical t-value for \( df=6 \) degrees of freedom. If the calculated t-value exceeds the critical t value, we would reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence that the average number of neurons in the prefrontal cortex of autistic children is greater than that of non-autistic children.

Step by step solution

01

State the null and alternative hypotheses

Our null hypothesis is that the mean number of neurons for autistic children is equal to that of non-autistic children (\( \mu = 1.15 \) billion) and the alternative hypothesis is that the mean for autistic children is greater than that of non-autistic children (\( \mu > 1.15 \) billion).
02

Choose hypothesis test

We are going to carry out a one-sample t-test since we are comparing the sample mean to a known value.
03

Calculate the test statistic

The formula for t-value is \( t = \frac{\overline{x} - \mu}{s/\sqrt{n}} \), where \( \overline{x} \) is the sample mean, \( \mu \) is the assumed population mean, \( s \) is the standard deviation and \( n \) is the number of values in the sample. So, \( t = \frac{1.94 - 1.15}{0.50/\sqrt{7}} \).
04

Find the p-value

We will compare our calculated t-value with t-distribution table for \( df = n-1 = 6 \) degrees of freedom and our \( \alpha = 0.05 \). If our t-value is greater than critical t-value, we will reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative.
05

Interpret the results

If we reject the null hypothesis, this supports the claim that autistic children have a higher mean number of neurons in the prefrontal cortex than non-autistic children.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Autism and Brain Development
Autism, a neurodevelopmental disorder, presents challenges in social interaction, communication, and restricted interests or repetitive behaviors. Research suggests that differences in brain development, detectable as early as the first year of life, could be linked to its manifestation.

For instance, studies have noted atypical patterns of growth in the heads of autistic children, showing a smaller head circumference at birth that expands rapidly within the first year. This could correlate with changes in the number of neurons in various parts of the brain, especially the prefrontal cortex, which is vital for complex functions like language and social interaction. The prefrontal cortex's alteration in autistic individuals might contribute to the difficulties experienced in these areas.

An increase in the number of neurons in the prefrontal cortex, as indicated by autopsy studies in autistic children, hints at a neurobiological foundation for the disorder. These findings support the hypothesis that autism stems from developmental differences that begin before birth, adding another layer to our understanding of the condition's complexity.
One-sample t-test
The one-sample t-test is a statistical method used to determine whether the mean of a single sample differs significantly from a known or hypothesized population mean. It's particularly useful when the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is small, with the t-distribution providing a more accurate estimation of the standard error.

In our autism study, a one-sample t-test compares the average number of neurons in the prefrontal cortex between autistic and non-autistic male children. We calculate the test statistic by comparing the sample mean to the assumed population mean, considering the sample standard deviation and size. The result helps determine if the observed difference is due to natural variation or if it's statistically significant, suggesting a true difference in neuron count.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
Central to hypothesis testing is defining the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (Ha). The null hypothesis represents a default position that there is no effect or no difference, and it is what we attempt to reject through our test. In the context of our study, H0 posits that the mean number of neurons in the prefrontal cortex of autistic children is equal to that of non-autistic children.

The alternative hypothesis, on the other hand, proposes what we suspect might be true instead. For the autism study, Ha contends that autistic children have, on average, a greater number of neurons in the prefrontal cortex than non-autistic children. By conducting the t-test, we aim to gather evidence to support or refute Ha and hence determine whether H0 can be rejected.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a vital concept in hypothesis testing that helps researchers determine if their findings are likely the result of a real effect rather than random chance. A result is considered statistically significant if the observed p-value is less than the predefined threshold, often set at 0.05 (5% significance level).

In our exercise, statistical significance comes into play when we compare the calculated t-value against the critical value from the t-distribution table. If the t-value exceeds the critical value, the p-value will be lower than our threshold, leading us to reject the null hypothesis. Rejecting H0 indicates a statistically significant difference in neuron count between autistic and non-autistic children's prefrontal cortex, offering evidence that developmental brain differences in autism are present from an early stage.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

We examine the effect of different inputs on determining the sample size needed to obtain a specific margin of error when finding a confidence interval for a proportion. Find the sample size needed to give, with \(95 \%\) confidence, a margin of error within \(\pm 3 \%\) when estimating a proportion. First, find the sample size needed if we have no prior knowledge about the population proportion \(p\). Then find the sample size needed if we have reason to believe that \(p \approx 0.7\). Finally, find the sample size needed if we assume \(p \approx 0.9 .\) Comment on the relationship between the sample size and estimates of \(p\).

A data collection method is described to investigate a difference in means. In each case, determine which data analysis method is more appropriate: paired data difference in means or difference in means with two separate groups. To measure the effectiveness of a new teaching method for math in elementary school, each student in a class getting the new instructional method is matched with a student in a separate class on \(\mathrm{IQ}\), family income, math ability level the previous year, reading level, and all demographic characteristics. At the end of the year, math ability levels are measured again.

Use a t-distribution to find a confidence interval for the difference in means \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) using the relevant sample results from paired data. Give the best estimate for \(\mu_{1}-\) \(\mu_{2},\) the margin of error, and the confidence interval. Assume the results come from random samples from populations that are approximately normally distributed, and that differences are computed using \(d=x_{1}-x_{2}\). A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) using the paired difference sample results \(\bar{x}_{d}=3.7, s_{d}=\) 2.1, \(n_{d}=30\)

A data collection method is described to investigate a difference in means. In each case, determine which data analysis method is more appropriate: paired data difference in means or difference in means with two separate groups. In a study to determine whether the color red increases how attractive men find women, one group of men rate the attractiveness of a woman after seeing her picture on a red background and another group of men rate the same woman after seeing her picture on a white background.

Is Gender Bias Influenced by Faculty Gender? Exercise 6.215 describes a study in which science faculty members are asked to recommend a salary for a lab manager applicant. All the faculty members received the same application, with half randomly given a male name and half randomly given a female name. In Exercise \(6.215,\) we see that the applications with female names received a significantly lower recommended salary. Does gender of the evaluator make a difference? In particular, considering only the 64 applications with female names, is the mean recommended salary different depending on the gender of the evaluating faculty member? The 32 male faculty gave a mean starting salary of \(\$ 27,111\) with a standard deviation of \(\$ 6948\) while the 32 female faculty gave a mean starting salary of \(\$ 25,000\) with a standard deviation of \(\$ 7966 .\) Show all details of the test.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free