Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Which one provides the strongest evidence against \(\mathrm{H}_{0} ?\) p-value \(=0.90\) or \(\quad\) p-value \(=0.08\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The p-value of 0.08 provides stronger evidence against the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\) compared to the p-value of 0.90.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the meaning of p-value

The p-value is a measure of the probability that an observed data set would be obtained by random chance, given that the null hypothesis is true. If the p-value is small, it means the observed data is very unlikely under the null hypothesis, and thus it provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis
02

Compare the two given p-values

Having the p-values 0.90 and 0.08, it can be said that the p-value of 0.90 is larger compared to 0.08. In the terms of sufficiency of evidence against the null hypothesis, a small p-value is more sufficient than a larger one.
03

Determine which p-value provides stronger evidence against the null hypothesis

As the p-value of 0.08 is smaller than the p-value of 0.90, it can be concluded that the p-value of 0.08 provides stronger evidence against the null hypothesis \(H_{0}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, often denoted as \(H_0\), is a fundamental concept in statistical hypothesis testing. It proposes that there is no significant difference or effect and that any observed variations are due to chance or random fluctuations. For example, if we were testing a new drug's effectiveness, the null hypothesis would assert that the drug has no effect on patients compared to a placebo.

When performing a hypothesis test, researchers aim to gather evidence that either supports or refutes the null hypothesis. A key aspect of this process is determining whether the data collected is significantly different from what would be expected if the null hypothesis were true. If the evidence strongly contradicts the null hypothesis, researchers may reject it in favor of an alternative hypothesis, which suggests that there is a significant effect or difference.
Probability
Probability is a measure of how likely an event is to occur, ranging from 0 (impossible) to 1 (certain). It’s an intrinsic part of statistics and plays a crucial role in hypothesis testing, where it helps to quantify the likelihood of obtaining the observed results under the assumption of the null hypothesis.

For instance, in the context of p-values, probability refers to the chance of observing data as extreme as, or more extreme than, the results obtained during the test, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. This concept allows researchers to make quantitative decisions about the data. It’s essential to remember that while probability can indicate how likely an event is, it is not a definitive prediction. A low probability does not guarantee that an event won't occur; it just means it's less likely.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a determination about whether the observed results in a study or experiment are unlikely to have occurred by chance. This determination is typically made by calculating the p-value during hypothesis testing. The p-value measures the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis.

A common threshold for declaring statistical significance is a p-value of less than 0.05, meaning there is less than a 5% probability that the observed results occurred by random chance, considering the null hypothesis is true. When a result is statistically significant, it suggests that the observed effect or difference is likely real and not just a random occurrence. However, it's important to note that statistical significance does not imply practical significance; the result may be statistically reliable but not necessarily large or important in a practical sense.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A statistics instructor would like to ask "clicker" questions that about \(80 \%\) of her students in a large lecture class will get correct. A higher proportion would be too easy and a lower proportion might discourage students. Suppose that she tries a sample of questions and receives 76 correct answers and 24 incorrect answers among 100 responses. The hypotheses of interest are \(H_{0}: p=0.80\) vs \(H_{a}: p \neq 0.80 .\) Discuss whether or not the methods described below would be appropriate ways to generate randomization samples in this setting. Explain your reasoning in each case. (a) Sample 100 answers (with replacement) from the original student responses. Count the number of correct responses. (b) Sample 100 answers (with replacement) from a set consisting of 8 correct responses and 2 incorrect responses. Count the number of correct mses.

Introductory statistics students fill out a survey on the first day of class. One of the questions asked is "How many hours of exercise do you typically get each week?" Responses for a sample of 50 students are introduced in Example 3.25 on page 244 and stored in the file ExerciseHours. The summary statistics are shown in the computer output below. The mean hours of exercise for the combined sample of 50 students is 10.6 hours per week and the standard deviation is 8.04 . We are interested in whether these sample data provide evidence that the mean number of hours of exercise per week is different between male and female statistics students. $$\begin{array}{lllrrrr} \text { Variable } & \text { Gender } & \text { N } & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } & \text { Minimum } & \text{ Maximum } \\\\\text { Exercise } & \mathrm{F} & 30 & 9.40 & 7.41 & 0.00 & 34.00 \\\& \mathrm{M} & 20 & 12.40 & 8.80 & 2.00 & 30.00\end{array}$$ Discuss whether or not the methods described below would be appropriate ways to generate randomization samples that are consistent with \(H_{0}: \mu_{F}=\mu_{M}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{F} \neq \mu_{M} .\) Explain your reasoning in each case. (a) Randomly label 30 of the actual exercise values with "F" for the female group and the remaining 20 exercise values with "M" for the males. Compute the difference in the sample means, \(\bar{x}_{F}-\bar{x}_{M}\). (b) Add 1.2 to every female exercise value to give a new mean of 10.6 and subtract 1.8 from each male exercise value to move their mean to 10.6 (and match the females). Sample 30 values (with replacement) from the shifted female values and 20 values (with replacement) from the shifted male values. Compute the difference in the sample means, \(\bar{x}_{F}-\bar{x}_{M}\) (c) Combine all 50 sample values into one set of data having a mean amount of 10.6 hours. Select 30 values (with replacement) to represent a sample of female exercise hours and 20 values (also with replacement) for a sample of male exercise values. Compute the difference in the sample means, \(\bar{x}_{F}-\bar{x}_{M}\) .

In a test to see whether males, on average, have bigger noses than females, the study indicates that " \(p<0.01\)."

Exercise 4.113 refers to a survey used to assess the ignorance of the public to global population trends. A similar survey was conducted in the United Kingdom, where respondents were asked if they had a university degree. One question asked, "In the last 20 years the proportion of the world population living in extreme poverty has \(\ldots, "\) and three choices 2) "remained more or were provided: 1\()^{\text {6i }}\) increased" less the same," and 3) "decreased." Of 373 university degree holders, 45 responded with the correct answer: decreased; of 639 non-degree respondents, 57 responded with the correct answer. \({ }^{35}\) We would like to test if the percent of correct answers is significantly different between degree holders and non- degree holders. (a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? (b) Using StatKey or other technology, construct a randomization distribution and compute the p-value. (c) State the conclusion in context.

In Exercise 3.129 on page \(254,\) we see that the home team was victorious in 70 games out of a sample of 120 games in the FA premier league, a football (soccer) league in Great Britain. We wish to investigate the proportion \(p\) of all games won by the home team in this league. (a) Use StatKeyor other technology to find and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of games won by the home team. (b) State the null and alternative hypotheses for a test to see if there is evidence that the proportion is different from 0.5 . (c) Use the confidence interval from part (a) to make a conclusion in the test from part (b). State the confidence level used. (d) Use StatKey or other technology to create a randomization distribution and find the p-value for the test in part (b). (e) Clearly interpret the result of the test using the p-value and using a \(10 \%\) significance level. Does your answer match your answer from part (c)? (f) What information does the confidence interval give that the p-value doesn't? What information does the p-value give that the confidence interval doesn't? (g) What's the main difference between the bootstrap distribution of part (a) and the randomization distribution of part (d)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free