Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

You roll a die 60 times and record the sample proportion of 5 's, and you want to test whether the die is biased to give more 5 's than a fair die would ordinarily give. To find the p-value for your sample data, you create a randomization distribution of proportions of 5 's in many simulated samples of size 60 with a fair die. (a) State the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Where will the center of the distribution be? Why? (c) Give an example of a sample proportion for which the number of 5 's obtained is less than what you would expect in a fair die. (d) Will your answer to part (c) lie on the left or the right of the center of the randomization distribution? (e) To find the p-value for your answer to part (c), would you look at the left, right, or both tails? (f) For your answer in part (c), can you say anything about the size of the p-value?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The null hypothesis is that the die is fair and the probability of getting 5 is \(\frac{1}{6}\). The alternative hypothesis is that the die is biased with a probability of getting 5 higher than \(\frac{1}{6}\). The center of the distribution is at 0.167. An unusual sample proportion could be 0.10, which would lie to the left of the center. The p-value is calculated from the right tail, and its size will technically be 1.

Step by step solution

01

- Formulating Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The Null Hypothesis, \(H_0\), suggests that there is no significant difference between the observed and expected results. This means that the die is fair and the probability of getting a 5 is \(\frac{1}{6}\). The Alternative Hypothesis, \(H_1\), suggests that there is a significant difference between the observed and expected results. This means that the die is biased and the probability of rolling a 5 is greater than \(\frac{1}{6}\).
02

- Identifying The Center of Distribution and Reasoning

The center of the distribution for a fair die, under the Null Hypothesis, will be at the expected proportion of 5's, which is \(\frac{1}{6}\) or approximately 0.167 because a fair die has an equal chance of rolling each number.
03

- An Example of an Unusual Sample Proportion

An example of a sample proportion for which the number of 5's obtained is less than what would be expected from a fair die could be 0.10. This is because under the null hypothesis we would expect the proportion to be around 0.167, therefore 0.10 would be less than expected.
04

- Position of the Unusual Sample Proportion in Distribution

The unusual sample proportion from step 3 (0.10) would lie to the left of the center of the randomization distribution (0.167). This is because a proportion less than the expected value would lie to the left of the expected value in the distribution.
05

- Determining P-value Position for the Sample Proportion

To find the p-value for the sample proportion calculated in step 3, one would look at the right tail. This is because the p-value is determined by the probability of getting a result as extreme or more extreme than the observed result under the null hypothesis.
06

- Brief Comment on Size of the P-value for Given Sample Proportion

As the observed proportion (0.10) lies to the left and the test is for greater proportion in the alternative hypothesis, the p-value will technically be 1. This is because we are looking all values as extreme or more extreme than our observed result, and since our test is one-sided to the right, all values fall into this category.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In any statistical analysis, the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) acts as the starting assumption. It is a general statement or default position that there is no relationship between two measured phenomena or no association among groups. In the die bias test, the null hypothesis would state that the die is fair; thus, the probability of rolling a 5 is \frac{1}{6}, which is what one would expect from a fair die with six equal sides. Understanding the null hypothesis is critical because it forms the basis of the statistical test and determines what the alternative hypothesis will be, which is the next concept we'll explore.
Alternative Hypothesis
Contrary to the null hypothesis, the alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\text{ or }\H_a\)) signifies what a researcher aims to prove. It proposes that there is a statistically significant effect or relationship between variables or that a single variable differs from a specified value. Regarding the die test, the alternative hypothesis posits that the die is biased, leading to a greater than \frac{1}{6} chance of rolling a 5. The alternative hypothesis is what you test against the null hypothesis, and if evidence supports it enough, you may reject the null hypothesis.
Randomization Distribution
The randomization distribution is a critical component in the resampling or simulation-based inference methods used in statistics. It refers to the distribution of a test statistic that is created by calculating the statistic for numerous re-sampled or simulated datasets. For the die bias test, the randomization distribution would illustrate the expected proportions of rolling a 5 in a large number of simulated samples of 60 rolls each, assuming that the die is fair. It is expected to center around the null hypothesis value of 0.167. Mapping out the entire distribution is core to understanding the behavior under the null hypothesis and subsequently finding the p-value.
P-value
The p-value is a foundational concept in hypothesis testing that helps you decide whether to support or reject your null hypothesis. It is the probability of obtaining the observed sample results, or more extreme, assuming the null hypothesis is true. A low p-value (< 0.05 is a common threshold) indicates that your sample findings are unlikely under the null hypothesis, which may lead you to reject it in favor of the alternative hypothesis. In the context of the die bias test, you would calculate the p-value by looking at the right tail (since we're testing for more 5s) of the randomization distribution. However, if your sample proportion is less than the expected (like the example of 0.10), your p-value will lean towards 1, suggesting no evidence against the null hypothesis in this one-sided test.
Sample Proportion
The sample proportion is the fraction of items in a sample that have a particular attribute, and it's a statistic used to estimate a population proportion. In our exercise, if you roll the die 60 times, the sample proportion of 5's is the number of 5's rolled divided by 60. Sample proportions are affected by random sampling variations, and using them to draw conclusions about the fairness of the die involves comparing the observed proportion to the expected proportion under the null hypothesis. As in the example given, a sample proportion of 0.10 would be significantly less than the expected proportion of 0.167 for a fair die, affecting our interpretations and the resulting p-value.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a term used to state that a result is not likely to occur by chance. In hypothesis testing, a result is considered statistically significant if the p-value is below a predetermined threshold, typically 0.05. This significance level indicates that there is less than a 5% probability that the observed result is due to random variation alone. In our die bias test, if the p-value is very low when testing an observed increase in the number of 5's, this would suggest a statistically significant result, providing evidence to reject the null hypothesis and support the claim of a biased die. However, a high p-value, as in the unusual sample proportion, does not provide evidence against the null hypothesis and would not be considered statistically significant.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A confidence interval for a sample is given, followed by several hypotheses to test using that sample. In each case, use the confidence interval to give a conclusion of the test (if possible) and also state the significance level you are using. A \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(p_{1}-p_{2}: 0.07\) to 0.18 (a) \(H_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: p_{1} \neq p_{2}\) (b) \(H_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: p_{1}>p_{2}\) (c) \(H_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: p_{1}

Do you think that students undergo physiological changes when in potentially stressful situations such as taking a quiz or exam? A sample of statistics students were interrupted in the middle of a quiz and asked to record their pulse rates (beats for a 1-minute period). Ten of the students had also measured their pulse rate while sitting in class listening to a lecture, and these values were matched with their quiz pulse rates. The data appear in Table 4.18 and are stored in QuizPulse10. Note that this is paired data since we have two values, a quiz and a lecture pulse rate, for each student in the sample. The question of interest is whether quiz pulse rates tend to be higher, on average, than lecture pulse rates. (Hint: Since this is paired data, we work with the differences in pulse rate for each student between quiz and lecture. If the differences are \(D=\) quiz pulse rate minus lecture pulse rate, the question of interest is whether \(\mu_{D}\) is greater than zero.) Table 4.18 Quiz and Lecture pulse rates for I0 students $$\begin{array}{lcccccccccc} \text { Student } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 \\ \hline \text { Quiz } & 75 & 52 & 52 & 80 & 56 & 90 & 76 & 71 & 70 & 66 \\\ \text { Lecture } & 73 & 53 & 47 & 88 & 55 & 70 & 61 & 75 & 61 & 78 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ (a) Define the parameter(s) of interest and state the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Determine an appropriate statistic to measure and compute its value for the original sample. (c) Describe a method to generate randomization samples that is consistent with the null hypothesis and reflects the paired nature of the data. There are several viable methods. You might use shuffled index cards, a coin, or some other randomization procedure. (d) Carry out your procedure to generate one randomization sample and compute the statistic you chose in part (b) for this sample. (e) Is the statistic for your randomization sample more extreme (in the direction of the alternative) than the original sample?

Flying Home for the Holidays, On Time In Exercise 4.115 on page \(302,\) we compared the average difference between actual and scheduled arrival times for December flights on two major airlines: Delta and United. Suppose now that we are only interested in the proportion of flights arriving more than 30 minutes after the scheduled time. Of the 1,000 Delta flights, 67 arrived more than 30 minutes late, and of the 1,000 United flights, 160 arrived more than 30 minutes late. We are testing to see if this provides evidence to conclude that the proportion of flights that are over 30 minutes late is different between flying United or Delta. (a) State the null and alternative hypothesis. (b) What statistic will be recorded for each of the simulated samples to create the randomization distribution? What is the value of that statistic for the observed sample? (c) Use StatKey or other technology to create a randomization distribution. Estimate the p-value for the observed statistic found in part (b). (d) At a significance level of \(\alpha=0.01\), what is the conclusion of the test? Interpret in context. (e) Now assume we had only collected samples of size \(75,\) but got essentially the same proportions (5/75 late flights for Delta and \(12 / 75\) late flights for United). Repeating steps (b) through (d) on these smaller samples, do you come to the same conclusion?

Numerous studies have shown that a high fat diet can have a negative effect on a child's health. A new study \(^{22}\) suggests that a high fat diet early in life might also have a significant effect on memory and spatial ability. In the double-blind study, young rats were randomly assigned to either a high-fat diet group or to a control group. After 12 weeks on the diets, the rats were given tests of their spatial memory. The article states that "spatial memory was significantly impaired" for the high-fat diet rats, and also tells us that "there were no significant differences in amount of time exploring objects" between the two groups. The p-values for the two tests are 0.0001 and 0.7 . (a) Which p-value goes with the test of spatial memory? Which p-value goes with the test of time exploring objects? (b) The title of the article describing the study states "A high-fat diet causes impairment" in spatial memory. Is the wording in the title justified (for rats)? Why or why not?

Significant and Insignificant Results (a) If we are conducting a statistical test and determine that our sample shows significant results, there are two possible realities: We are right in our conclusion or we are wrong. In each case, describe the situation in terms of hypotheses and/or errors. (b) If we are conducting a statistical test and determine that our sample shows insignificant results, there are two possible realities: We are right in our conclusion or we are wrong. In each case, describe the situation in terms of hypotheses and/or errors. (c) Explain why we generally won't ever know which of the realities (in either case) is correct.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free