Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Exercises 4.59 to 4.64 give null and alternative hypotheses for a population proportion, as well as sample results. Use StatKey or other technology to generate a randomization distribution and calculate a p-value. StatKey tip: Use "Test for a Single Proportion" and then "Edit Data" to enter the sample information. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p>0.5\) Sample data: \(\hat{p}=30 / 50=0.60\) with \(n=50\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
In this task, you would generate a randomization distribution using a statistical software or technology and calculate a p-value based on that. The p-value is the likelihood of obtaining a sample proportion as extreme as, or more extreme than, the observed sample proportion, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. The smaller the p-value, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Define null and alternative hypothesis

The null hypothesis (\(H_{0}\)) suggests that the population proportion \(p\) is 0.5. The alternative hypothesis (\(H_{a}\)) suggests that the population proportion \(p\) is greater than 0.5.
02

Calculate test statistic

We need to calculate the test statistic. Under \(H_{0}\), we expect the proportion of successes to be 0.5. But in our sample, the proportion of successes is \(\hat{p}=0.60\). This is our test statistic.
03

Generate randomization distribution

We now generate a randomization distribution under the assumption that \(H_{0}\) is true, i.e. \(p=0.5\). We do this via a simulation. For each trial, we generate a sample of size \(n=50\) and we calculate the proportion of successes. We repeat this process many times (e.g. 10000 times) to obtain the randomization distribution.
04

Calculate p-value

The p-value is the probability of obtaining a result as extreme as, or more extreme than, the observed data, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. In this case, p-value is the proportion of trials in the randomization distribution that had a proportion of successes of 0.60 or more.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Population Proportion
Understanding the population proportion is crucial when conducting hypothesis tests in statistics. This concept refers to the true proportion of individuals or items within a larger, defined grouping that exhibit a certain trait or outcome. In hypothesis testing, we're often trying to determine if our sample data provides enough evidence to infer something about the population proportion.

For instance, if a coin is flipped 50 times, the population proportion we're interested in might be the proportion of flips that land heads. If we assume that the coin is fair, we would expect the population proportion, denoted as 'p', to be 0.5, meaning that half of the flips should land heads. However, if our sample data show a higher proportion of heads, say \( \hat{p} = 0.60 \), we may begin to question our assumption of fairness and consider if the true population proportion is actually greater than 0.5.
P-value Calculation
The p-value is a fundamental concept in hypothesis testing, serving as a bridge between observed data and the hypotheses we're evaluating. To put it simply, the p-value measures the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis. When we calculate a p-value, we're determining the probability of obtaining a sample statistic as extreme as the one observed, given that the null hypothesis is true.

Utilizing our example where a sample proportion \( \hat{p} = 0.60 \) is observed, the p-value calculation will help us understand the likelihood of seeing such a result if, in reality, the true population proportion is 0.5 (as stated in the null hypothesis, \( H_{0}: p = 0.5 \) ). A low p-value indicates that the observed result is unlikely under the null hypothesis, suggesting that the alternative hypothesis (in this case, \( H_{a}: p > 0.5 \)) may be true. The smaller the p-value, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis.
Randomization Distribution
The concept of a randomization distribution is vital for understanding how unusual our sample data is within the context of the null hypothesis. It's essentially a sampling distribution that shows us what kinds of results we might see if the null hypothesis were true and we collected many, many samples. By simulating numerous random samples, we create a distribution of statistics (like sample proportions) that could happen just by random chance.

In our coin example, where we're testing if the true population proportion of heads is greater than 0.5, we'd use randomization to create many sets of 50 coin flips. We'd simulate this under the null hypothesis, where each flip has a 50% chance of being heads. After many trials, we create a randomization distribution that gives us a visual and numerical sense of how likely different sample proportions are. This distribution is then used to assess the rarity of our observed sample statistic (\( \hat{p} = 0.60 \) ) and thus to calculate the p-value.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercise 4.26 discusses a sample of households in the US. We are interested in determining whether or not there is a linear relationship between household income and number of children. (a) Define the relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Which sample correlation shows more evidence of a relationship, \(r=0.25\) or \(r=0.75 ?\) (c) Which sample correlation shows more evidence of a relationship, \(r=0.50\) or \(r=-0.50 ?\)

Testing 50 people in a driving simulator to find the average reaction time to hit the brakes when an object is seen in the view ahead.

Do iPads Help Kindergartners Learn: A Series of Tests Exercise 4.147 introduces a study in which half of the kindergarten classes in a school district are randomly assigned to receive iPads. We learn that the results are significant at the \(5 \%\) level (the mean for the iPad group is significantly higher than for the control group) for the results on the HRSIW subtest. In fact, the HRSIW subtest was one of 10 subtests and the results were not significant for the other 9 tests. Explain, using the problem of multiple tests, why we might want to hesitate before we run out to buy iPads for all kindergartners based on the results of this study.

The same sample statistic is used to test a hypothesis, using different sample sizes. In each case, use StatKey or other technology to find the p-value and indicate whether the results are significant at a \(5 \%\) level. Which sample size provides the strongest evidence for the alternative hypothesis? Testing \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p>0.5\) using \(\hat{p}=0.55\) with each of the following sample sizes: (a) \(\hat{p}=55 / 100=0.55\) (b) \(\hat{p}=275 / 500=0.55\) (c) \(\hat{p}=550 / 1000=0.55\)

4.151 Does Massage Really Help Reduce Inflammation in Muscles? In Exercise 4.112 on page \(301,\) we learn that massage helps reduce levels of the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 in muscles when muscle tissue is tested 2.5 hours after massage. The results were significant at the \(5 \%\) level. However, the authors of the study actually performed 42 different tests: They tested for significance with 21 different compounds in muscles and at two different times (right after the massage and 2.5 hours after). (a) Given this new information, should we have less confidence in the one result described in the earlier exercise? Why? (b) Sixteen of the tests done by the authors involved measuring the effects of massage on muscle metabolites. None of these tests were significant. Do you think massage affects muscle metabolites? (c) Eight of the tests done by the authors (including the one described in the earlier exercise) involved measuring the effects of massage on inflammation in the muscle. Four of these tests were significant. Do you think it is safe to conclude that massage really does reduce inflammation?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free