Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The null and alternative hypotheses for a test are given as well as some information about the actual sample(s) and the statistic that is computed for each randomization sample. Indicate where the randomization distribution will be centered. In addition, indicate whether the test is a left-tail test, a right-tail test, or a twotailed test. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: \mu=10\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu>10\) Sample: \(\bar{x}=12, s=3.8, n=40\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The center of the randomization distribution is 10, and it is a right-tailed test.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Concepts

The null hypothesis, denoted by \(H_{0}\), is a statement that the value of a population parameter, such as the population mean \(\mu\), is equal to a claimed value. The alternative hypothesis, denoted by \(H_{a}\), is the statement that the parameter has a value that somehow differs from the null hypothesis. The claim is usually that the parameter is larger, smaller or different from the value given in the null hypothesis.
02

Calculate Center of Randomization Distribution

The center of the randomization distribution in hypothesis testing will be the same as the mean of the null hypothesis, \(\mu\). So, the center of the randomization distribution is 10.
03

Determine Type of Hypothesis Test

Looking at the alternative hypothesis, the symbol '>' is an indication that it's a right-tailed test because the interest is in the values to the right (greater) of the center of the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, symbolically represented as \(H_{0}\), is a fundamental concept in the realm of hypothesis testing within statistics. It proposes that there is no significant effect or no difference present, asserting that any observed variations in the data are merely due to random chance. In essence, it embodies the assumption of no change or no association.

When formulating a null hypothesis, you typically state that the population parameter, such as the mean \(\mu\), is equal to a specific value. For example, in the given exercise, the null hypothesis is \(H_{0}: \mu=10\), suggesting that the true population mean is presumed to be 10 unless evidence suggests otherwise. A strong grasp of this concept is pivotal as it serves as the starting point for statistical analysis and sets the stage for testing using sample data.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, denoted as \(H_{a}\) in statistical tests, posits a specific statement contrary to the null hypothesis. It asserts that there is a statistically significant effect, association, or difference that exists in the population. It essentially represents what you aim to support with evidence from your sample data.

In the context of our illustrative exercise, the alternative hypothesis is \(H_{a}: \mu>10\), suggesting the population mean is greater than 10. It's crucial to differentiate between the null and alternative hypotheses, as the entirety of hypothesis testing is designed to evaluate the likelihood of the alternative hypothesis being true given that the null hypothesis is the default position.
Randomization Distribution
Understanding randomization distribution is integral in appreciating how hypothesis testing works. Think of randomization distribution as a map of all possible outcomes that could arise if the null hypothesis were true. In the aesthetics of this map, the 'center' holds a special place, as it corresponds to the value of the parameter that is being hypothesized in the null hypothesis.

In our exercise, since we've established the null hypothesis as \(H_{0}: \mu=10\), the randomization distribution would be centered at this value. It implies that if our samples were drawn randomly under true null conditions, the mean of these randomization samples should hover around 10. Recognizing the center of this distribution is key for determining how extreme our sample statistic is and, consequently, whether there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
Tail Test
In hypothesis testing, a 'tail test' refers to the direction in which we are looking for evidence against our null hypothesis within the randomization distribution. Depending on the nature of the alternative hypothesis, it can lead to a left-tailed, right-tailed, or two-tailed test.

A left-tailed test is conducted when the alternative hypothesis indicates a parameter is less than the null hypothesis claim, a right-tailed test when it suggests the parameter is more, and a two-tailed test when the parameter is simply not equal to the claim. As outlined in the exercise, with an alternative hypothesis of \(H_{a}: \mu>10\), we are specifically looking for a sample mean to be significantly larger than 10, leading us to a right-tailed test. The 'tail' in a right-tailed test is essentially the area under the curve to the right of the central value where extreme values supporting the alternative hypothesis would lie.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercise 4.19 on page 269 describes a study investigating the effects of exercise on cognitive function. \({ }^{31}\) Separate groups of mice were exposed to running wheels for \(0,2,4,7,\) or 10 days. Cognitive function was measured by \(Y\) maze performance. The study was testing whether exercise improves brain function, whether exercise reduces levels of BMP (a protein which makes the brain slower and less nimble), and whether exercise increases the levels of noggin (which improves the brain's ability). For each of the results quoted in parts (a), (b), and (c), interpret the information about the p-value in terms of evidence for the effect. (a) "Exercise improved Y-maze performance in most mice by the 7 th day of exposure, with further increases after 10 days for all mice tested \((p<.01)\) (b) "After only two days of running, BMP ... was reduced \(\ldots\) and it remained decreased for all subsequent time-points \((p<.01)\)." (c) "Levels of noggin ... did not change until 4 days, but had increased 1.5 -fold by \(7-10\) days of exercise \((p<.001)\)." (d) Which of the tests appears to show the strongest statistical effect? (e) What (if anything) can we conclude about the effects of exercise on mice?

Hypotheses for a statistical test are given, followed by several possible confidence intervals for different samples. In each case, use the confidence interval to state a conclusion of the test for that sample and give the significance level used. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: \mu=15\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu \neq 15\) (a) \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu: \quad 13.9\) to 16.2 (b) \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu: \quad 12.7\) to 14.8 (c) \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu: \quad 13.5\) to 16.5

Suppose you want to find out if reading speed is any different between a print book and an e-book. (a) Clearly describe how you might set up an experiment to test this. Give details. (b) Why is a hypothesis test valuable here? What additional information does a hypothesis test give us beyond the descriptive statistics we discuss in Chapter \(2 ?\) (c) Why is a confidence interval valuable here? What additional information does a confidence interval give us beyond the descriptive statistics of Chapter 2 and the results of a hypothesis test described in part (b)? (d) A similar study \(^{53}\) has been conducted, and reports that "the difference between Kindle and the book was significant at the \(p<.01\) level, and the difference between the iPad and the book was marginally significant at \(p=.06 . "\) The report also stated that "the iPad measured at \(6.2 \%\) slower reading speed than the printed book, whereas the Kindle measured at \(10.7 \%\) slower than print. However, the difference between the two devices [iPad and Kindle] was not statistically significant because of the data's fairly high variability." Can you tell from the first quotation which method of reading (print or e-book) was faster in the sample or do you need the second quotation for that? Explain the results in your own words.

For each situation described, indicate whether it makes more sense to use a relatively large significance level (such as \(\alpha=0.10\) ) or a relatively small significance level (such as \(\alpha=0.01\) ). Testing a new drug with potentially dangerous side effects to see if it is significantly better than the drug currently in use. If it is found to be more effective, it will be prescribed to millions of people.

In this exercise, we see that it is possible to use counts instead of proportions in testing a categorical variable. Data 4.7 describes an experiment to investigate the effectiveness of the two drugs desipramine and lithium in the treatment of cocaine addiction. The results of the study are summarized in Table 4.14 on page \(323 .\) The comparison of lithium to the placebo is the subject of Example 4.34 . In this exercise, we test the success of desipramine against a placebo using a different statistic than that used in Example 4.34. Let \(p_{d}\) and \(p_{c}\) be the proportion of patients who relapse in the desipramine group and the control group, respectively. We are testing whether desipramine has a lower relapse rate then a placebo. (a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? (b) From Table 4.14 we see that 20 of the 24 placebo patients relapsed, while 10 of the 24 desipramine patients relapsed. The observed difference in relapses for our sample is $$\begin{aligned}D &=\text { desipramine relapses }-\text { placebo relapses } \\\&=10-20=-10\end{aligned}$$ If we use this difference in number of relapses as our sample statistic, where will the randomization distribution be centered? Why? (c) If the null hypothesis is true (and desipramine has no effect beyond a placebo), we imagine that the 48 patients have the same relapse behavior regardless of which group they are in. We create the randomization distribution by simulating lots of random assignments of patients to the two groups and computing the difference in number of desipramine minus placebo relapses for each assignment. Describe how you could use index cards to create one simulated sample. How many cards do you need? What will you put on them? What will you do with them?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free