Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Exercises 4.45 to \(4.49,\) the null and alternative hypotheses for a test are given as well as some information about the actual sample(s) and the statistic that is computed for each randomization sample. Indicate where the randomization distribution will be centered. In addition, indicate whether the test is a left-tail test, a right-tail test, or a twotailed test. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p<0.5\) Sample: \(\hat{p}=0.4, n=30\) Randomization statistic \(=\hat{p}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The center of the randomization distribution will be 0.5, and the test is a left-tail test.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Hypotheses

The null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) implies that the population proportion \(p\) equals 0.5. The alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}: p<0.5\) suggests that the population proportion \(p\) is less than 0.5. As the alternative hypothesis is less than, it represents a left-tail test.
02

Identifying the Randomization Distribution Center

The center of the randomization distribution under the null hypothesis is at the assumed value of \(p\) in the null hypothesis, which here is 0.5.
03

Identifying the type of test

Based on the alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}: p<0.5\), this is a left-tail test, this is because we are looking for values of \(p\) which are less than the hypothesized value in \(H_{0}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
When diving into statistical hypothesis testing, one must understand the cornerstone concept of the null hypothesis, typically denoted as \(H_0\). The null hypothesis is a statement that there is no effect or no difference, and it sets the stage for statistical comparison. For instance, in the context of a population proportion test, the null hypothesis might assert that the true proportion \(p\) equals a specific value, such as 0.5. In our exercise, the null hypothesis states that \(H_0: p=0.5\), meaning the hypothesis posits that half of the population has a certain characteristic.

In statistical tests, the null hypothesis is what we assume to be true until we have sufficient evidence to suggest otherwise. The thrills of statistical testing often lie in the potential to reject this hypothesis, implying that our data provides convincing evidence of an actual effect or difference.
Alternative Hypothesis
In the exciting world of hypothesis testing, the alternative hypothesis stands in opposition to the null hypothesis. Denoted as \(H_a\) or \(H_1\), it is a statement that suggests there is an effect or a difference, and we are interested in gathering evidence to support it. For problems related to population proportion, it proposes a value of \(p\) that is different from the value stated in the null hypothesis. In the exercise at hand, \(H_a: p<0.5\) theorizes that the population proportion is, in fact, less than 0.5.

This hypothesis is what researchers really hope to find evidence for, since it often represents the possibility of discovering new knowledge or confirming a theory. In our practical scenario, the alternative hypothesis is suggestive of a population proportion that is smaller than the anticipated 50%. If statistical testing supports this hypothesis, it can lead to significant conclusions about the population being studied.
Left-tail Test
Grasping the concept of a left-tail test is crucial for understanding the direction in which we expect our statistical evidence to lead us. A left-tail test, as the name implies, involves looking at the lower end, or 'left tail,' of the distribution of test statistics. It's used when the alternative hypothesis, \(H_a\), indicates that the parameter of interest is less than the null hypothesis value. To visualize it, picture a bell curve: a left-tail test focuses on the tail portion to the left of the center.

In our exercise, we have an alternative hypothesis of \(H_a: p<0.5\), which points to a left-tail test. We are essentially on the lookout for evidence that the sample proportion \(\hat{p}\) is significantly less than the hypothesized proportion of 0.5. If the calculated statistic from our sample falls into this left tail beyond a certain critical value, we may have enough ammunition to reject the null hypothesis.
Population Proportion
The concept of population proportion, symbolized as \(p\), is an estimate that reflects the fraction of a population that exhibits a particular trait. It is a summary statistic that tells us what percentage of the population we are studying falls into a specific category. The population proportion is a key parameter in many types of statistical tests, including tests of proportions.

In situations where we're working with a population proportion, as with the exercise provided, we often deal with a sample from the population to make inferences about this proportion. Our original exercise involves a sample that has been used to estimate the population proportion, which is indicated by the symbol \(\hat{p}\). Here the sample proportion of 0.4, taken from a sample size of 30, is used to make inferences about the population's proportion.
Sample Size
The term 'sample size', denoted as \(n\), plays an influential role in determining the reliability of a statistical test. It refers to the number of observations or measurements that are included in a statistical sample. The larger the sample size, the more confident we can be in our statistical inferences because a larger sample is more likely to represent the true characteristics of the population.

In our given exercise, the sample size is 30. This piece of information is critical because it affects the precision of our sample proportion \(\hat{p}\). When determining how conclusive our evidence is, or when calculating the margin of error or the test statistic, the sample size is an indispensable component to the formulae used. It's essential to remember that while larger samples provide a clearer picture, there are often practical and financial limitations to how large a sample can be.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Give null and alternative hypotheses for a population proportion, as well as sample results. Use StatKey or other technology to generate a randomization distribution and calculate a p-value. StatKey tip: Use "Test for a Single Proportion" and then "Edit Data" to enter the sample information. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p \neq 0.5\) Sample data: \(\hat{p}=42 / 100=0.42\) with \(n=100\)

Give null and alternative hypotheses for a population proportion, as well as sample results. Use StatKey or other technology to generate a randomization distribution and calculate a p-value. StatKey tip: Use "Test for a Single Proportion" and then "Edit Data" to enter the sample information. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p<0.5\) Sample data: \(\hat{p}=38 / 100=0.38\) with \(n=100\)

Eating Breakfast Cereal and Conceiving Boys Newscientist.com ran the headline "Breakfast Cereals Boost Chances of Conceiving Boys," based on an article which found that women who eat breakfast cereal before becoming pregnant are significantly more likely to conceive boys. \({ }^{42}\) The study used a significance level of \(\alpha=0.01\). The researchers kept track of 133 foods and, for each food, tested whether there was a difference in the proportion conceiving boys between women who ate the food and women who didn't. Of all the foods, only breakfast cereal showed a significant difference. (a) If none of the 133 foods actually have an effect on the gender of a conceived child, how many (if any) of the individual tests would you expect to show a significant result just by random chance? Explain. (Hint: Pay attention to the significance level.) (b) Do you think the researchers made a Type I error? Why or why not? (c) Even if you could somehow ascertain that the researchers did not make a Type I error, that is, women who eat breakfast cereals are actually more likely to give birth to boys, should you believe the headline "Breakfast Cereals Boost Chances of Conceiving Boys"? Why or why not?

Describe tests we might conduct based on Data 2.3 , introduced on page \(69 .\) This dataset, stored in ICUAdmissions, contains information about a sample of patients admitted to a hospital Intensive Care Unit (ICU). For each of the research questions below, define any relevant parameters and state the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses. Is the average age of ICU patients at this hospital greater than \(50 ?\)

Test \(\mathrm{A}\) is described in a journal article as being significant with " \(P<.01\) "; Test \(\mathrm{B}\) in the same article is described as being significant with " \(P<\).10." Using only this information, which test would you suspect provides stronger evidence for its alternative hypothesis?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free