Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Using the complete voting records of a county to see if there is evidence that more than \(50 \%\) of the eligible voters in the county voted in the last election.

Short Answer

Expert verified
To find if more than 50% of the eligible voters in the county voted in the last election, calculate the voting percentage and compare it with 50%. You need the complete voting records of the county and the total number of eligible voters for this.

Step by step solution

01

Obtaining the Necessary Data

First, gather the complete voting records for the county in question as well as the total number of eligible voters. The total number of votes cast will usually be found in the voting records, and you can get the total number of eligible voters from the county's voter registration records.
02

Calculating the Voting Percentage

Divide the total number of votes cast by the total number of eligible voters. Then multiply this number by 100 to get the percentage of eligible voters who actually voted.
03

Analyzing the Results

Compare your computed percentage from step 2 with 50%. If it's greater, then more than 50% of the eligible voters in the county voted in the election, if it's less, then less than 50% voted. If it's exactly 50%, then exactly half of the county's eligible voters participated in the last election.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Voter Turnout Rate
Understanding voter turnout rate is crucial when analyzing the health of a democracy. Put simply, the voter turnout rate indicates the percentage of eligible voters who cast their ballots in an election. It's a vital measure of civic engagement in a population.

To calculate the turnout rate, you divide the number of votes cast by the total number of eligible voters, and then multiply the result by 100 to express it as a percentage. For example, if 1,000 votes were cast in a county of 2,000 eligible voters, the turnout rate would be \( (1000/2000) \times 100 = 50% \).

High voter turnout is often seen as a sign of a vibrant democracy where citizens are actively participating in the decision-making process. On the other hand, low voter turnout can indicate a range of potential issues, including political disengagement, dissatisfaction with the candidates or the system, or barriers that make voting difficult or inconvenient.
Eligible Voter Statistics
Eligible voter statistics provide a snapshot of those who can legally participate in an election within a given jurisdiction. These numbers come from voter registration databases and demographic data to identify citizens of voting age and other criteria such as residency or lack of disqualifying factors (e.g., felony convictions in some jurisdictions).

When talking about eligible voters, one must consider various factors at play that can affect these statistics. These include changes in population size, shifts in the demographic makeup of the area, and legislative changes regarding voting requirements. For instance, a change in the law that lowers the voting age or enfranchises a new category of residents will affect the number of eligible voters.

Having accurate eligible voter statistics is essential for election planning, resource allocation, and campaign strategies. It is also a critical component when performing a comprehensive election data analysis, as fluctuations in these numbers can significantly impact voter turnout rate calculations.
Election Data Analysis
Election data analysis is a vital process that encompasses reviewing and interpreting various datasets to understand electoral trends and behaviors. This type of analysis can include studying voter turnout rates, election results, voting patterns among different demographics, and the effect of electoral policies.

For example, by examining voter turnout over multiple election cycles, analysts can identify if there has been a sustained increase or decrease in participation or if certain events, like major political shifts or implementation of new voting technologies, have a notable impact. Analysts may also look into correlation patterns, such as whether certain types of voter outreach (like door-to-door canvassing or social media campaigns) are effective at increasing turnout.

Crucially, election data analysis can reveal disparities in participation, prompting discussions about voter disenfranchisement or the efficacy of initiatives aimed at increasing voter turnout. The results of such analysis guide policymakers, electoral commissions, and advocacy groups in making decisions aimed at improving the democratic process.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

We are conducting many hypothesis tests to test a claim. In every case, assume that the null hypothesis is true. Approximately how many of the tests will incorrectly find significance? 40 tests using a significance level of \(10 \%\).

Data 4.3 on page 265 introduces a situation in which a restaurant chain is measuring the levels of arsenic in chicken from its suppliers. The question is whether there is evidence that the mean level of arsenic is greater than \(80 \mathrm{ppb},\) so we are testing \(H_{0}: \mu=80\) vs \(H_{a}:\) \(\mu>80,\) where \(\mu\) represents the average level of arsenic in all chicken from a certain supplier. It takes money and time to test for arsenic, so samples are often small. Suppose \(n=6\) chickens from one supplier are tested, and the levels of arsenic (in ppb) are: \(\begin{array}{llllll}68, & 75, & 81, & 93, & 95, & 134\end{array}\) (a) What is the sample mean for the data? (b) Translate the original sample data by the appropriate amount to create a new dataset in which the null hypothesis is true. How do the sample size and standard deviation of this new dataset compare to the sample size and standard deviation of the original dataset? (c) Write the six new data values from part (b) on six cards. Sample from these cards with replacement to generate one randomization sample. (Select a card at random, record the value, put it back, select another at random, until you have a sample of size \(6,\) to match the original sample size.) List the values in the sample and give the sample mean. (d) Generate 9 more simulated samples, for a total of 10 samples for a randomization distribution. Give the sample mean in each case and create a small dotplot. Use an arrow to locate the original sample mean on your dotplot.

It is believed that sunlight offers some protection against multiple sclerosis (MS) since the disease is rare near the equator and more prevalent at high latitudes. What is it about sunlight that offers this protection? To find out, researchers \({ }^{23}\) injected mice with proteins that induce a condition in mice comparable to MS in humans. The control mice got only the injection, while a second group of mice were exposed to UV light before and after the injection, and a third group of mice received vitamin D supplements before and after the injection. In the test comparing UV light to the control group, evidence was found that the mice exposed to UV suppressed the MS-like disease significantly better than the control mice. In the test comparing mice getting vitamin D supplements to the control group, the mice given the vitamin D did not fare significantly better than the control group. If the p-values for the two tests are 0.472 and 0.002 , which p-value goes with which test?

A confidence interval for a sample is given, followed by several hypotheses to test using that sample. In each case, use the confidence interval to give a conclusion of the test (if possible) and also state the significance level you are using. A \(99 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu: 134\) to 161 (a) \(H_{0}: \mu=100\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu \neq 100\) (b) \(H_{0}: \mu=150 \mathrm{vs} H_{a}: \mu \neq 150\) (c) \(H_{0}: \mu=200\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu \neq 200\)

The same sample statistic is used to test a hypothesis, using different sample sizes. In each case, use StatKey or other technology to find the p-value and indicate whether the results are significant at a \(5 \%\) level. Which sample size provides the strongest evidence for the alternative hypothesis? Testing \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p>0.5\) using \(\hat{p}=0.58\) with each of the following sample sizes: (a) \(\hat{p}=29 / 50=0.58\) (b) \(\hat{p}=290 / 500=0.58\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free