Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Giving a Coke/Pepsi taste test to random people in New York City to determine if there is evidence for the claim that Pepsi is preferred.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Carrying out a taste test, counting the preferences for Pepsi, and calculating the Pepsi preference rate will enable to make a basic judgment on whether Pepsi is preferred by most participants. A more statistically rigorous claim would require a more deep-seated analysis including hypothesis testing.

Step by step solution

01

Conduct the Taste Test

Carry out a taste test among random participants in New York City. Sample groups from a range of demographics to ensure the results are non-biased. Each participant should taste both drinks (Coke and Pepsi) in random order, without knowing which one they're tasting. Record their choice after they have tasted both drinks.
02

Data Collection and Representation

At the end of the day, count the total number of participants and the number of participants who preferred Pepsi over Coke. May represent the data in tabular or graphical format for clearer understanding. It's a simple binary choice situation, so representing the data using pie charts or bar graphs might work well.
03

Data Analysis

Calculate the percentage of participants who preferred Pepsi over Coke by dividing the number of Pepsi preferences by the total number of participants and multiplying by 100. This will give the preference rate for Pepsi.
04

Result Interpretation

If the Pepsi preference rate is over 50%, this would suggest that in the sample group, Pepsi is favored over Coke. If it's much higher or somewhat near to 50%, it might suggest that Pepsi has an advantage in the population, but we need to account for randomness and uncertainties due to the size and randomness in the sampling process. Statistically, a hypothesis test may need to be conducted to assert the claim more rigorously. However, a simple preference rate can give a basic understanding on people's preference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Data Collection in Taste Tests
Data collection is a crucial step in any statistical study, as it sets the foundation for all subsequent analysis. In the context of a taste test, such as the Coke vs. Pepsi challenge, data must be collected methodically to ensure accurate and reliable results. To start with, a random sample of participants must be selected to avoid bias. This sample should represent various demographics, such as age, gender, and ethnicity, to reflect the broader population's preferences.

In practice, each participant is asked to taste both beverages without knowing which is which, a method known as a 'blind taste test' to prevent preconceived notions from influencing their preference. After tasting both options, they indicate their favored drink. This response is binary—Pepsi or Coke—making it relatively straightforward to record and tally. However, it's essential to consider external factors that may affect the results, like the time of day, location of the test, or even the weather, as these can all inadvertently influence taste perception. The outcome of this stage is a dataset that should accurately reflect the participants' preferences and be representative of the larger population.
Data Analysis in Experimental Research
Once data is collected, the next step is to make sense of it through data analysis. For the Pepsi vs. Coke taste test scenario, analysis begins by converting raw numbers into percentages, providing an immediate visual on which soda was preferred. For instance, if 60 out of 100 participants favored Pepsi, this translates to a 60% preference rate for Pepsi over Coke.

However, to derive deeper insights from this data, researchers might employ more sophisticated statistical methods. They can calculate measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) to understand general trends, or measures of variability (standard deviation, variance) to appreciate the data's spread. Also, considering the sample size is crucial since a larger sample generally provides more reliable results.

Visual Representation of Data

Graphs like pie charts and bar graphs are commonly used because they are visually intuitive. Pie charts can quickly convey how large the preference for Pepsi is relative to Coke, while a bar graph can help compare the number of people preferring each drink side by side—critical for a clear presentation of findings to others.
Hypothesis Testing Explained
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to determine if there is enough evidence in a sample of data to infer a particular condition for the entire population. In the taste test example, the hypothesis might be that 'Pepsi is preferred over Coke.' This is known as the alternative hypothesis, often shown as 'H1'. The null hypothesis 'H0' might state that there is no preference between Coke and Pepsi.

To test these hypotheses, researchers would use a hypothesis testing framework, such as the p-value approach, to determine the probability of obtaining a result equal to or more extreme than what was observed, purely by chance, given that the null hypothesis is true. If this probability (the p-value) is below a predetermined significance level, such as 0.05, the null hypothesis can be rejected in favor of the alternative. This means that the data provides sufficient evidence to suggest that indeed Pepsi is preferred over Coke.

It's essential to realize that hypothesis testing does not prove a hypothesis to be true or false; instead, it assesses whether the available data provides strong enough evidence to reasonably reject one hypothesis in favor of the other. It is why stating 'failure to reject the null hypothesis' is more accurate than saying 'the null hypothesis is accepted' when the evidence isn't strong enough.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercise 2.19 on page 58 introduces a study examining whether giving antibiotics in infancy increases the likelihood that the child will be overweight. Prescription records were examined to determine whether or not antibiotics were prescribed during the first year of a child's life, and each child was classified as overweight or not at age 12. (Exercise 2.19 looked at the results for age 9.) The researchers compared the proportion overweight in each group. The study concludes that: "Infants receiving antibiotics in the first year of life were more likely to be overweight later in childhood compared with those who were unexposed \((32.4 \%\) versus \(18.2 \%\) at age 12 \(P=0.002) "\) (a) What is the explanatory variable? What is the response variable? Classify each as categorical or quantitative. (b) Is this an experiment or an observational study? (c) State the null and alternative hypotheses and define the parameters. (d) Give notation and the value of the relevant sample statistic. (e) Use the p-value to give the formal conclusion of the test (Reject \(H_{0}\) or Do not reject \(H_{0}\) ) and to give an indication of the strength of evidence for the result. (f) Can we conclude that whether or not children receive antibiotics in infancy causes the difference in proportion classified as overweight?

Suppose you want to find out if reading speed is any different between a print book and an e-book. (a) Clearly describe how you might set up an experiment to test this. Give details. (b) Why is a hypothesis test valuable here? What additional information does a hypothesis test give us beyond the descriptive statistics we discuss in Chapter \(2 ?\) (c) Why is a confidence interval valuable here? What additional information does a confidence interval give us beyond the descriptive statistics of Chapter 2 and the results of a hypothesis test described in part (b)? (d) A similar study \(^{53}\) has been conducted, and reports that "the difference between Kindle and the book was significant at the \(p<.01\) level, and the difference between the iPad and the book was marginally significant at \(p=.06 . "\) The report also stated that "the iPad measured at \(6.2 \%\) slower reading speed than the printed book, whereas the Kindle measured at \(10.7 \%\) slower than print. However, the difference between the two devices [iPad and Kindle] was not statistically significant because of the data's fairly high variability." Can you tell from the first quotation which method of reading (print or e-book) was faster in the sample or do you need the second quotation for that? Explain the results in your own words.

A study \(^{20}\) conducted in June 2015 examines ownership of tablet computers by US adults. A random sample of 959 people were surveyed, and we are told that 197 of the 455 men own a tablet and 235 of the 504 women own a tablet. We want to test whether the survey results provide evidence of a difference in the proportion owning a tablet between men and women. (a) State the null and alternative hypotheses, and define the parameters. (b) Give the notation and value of the sample statistic. In the sample, which group has higher tablet ownership: men or women? (c) Use StatKey or other technology to find the pvalue.

Exercises 4.29 on page 271 and 4.76 on page 287 describe a historical scenario in which a British woman, Muriel BristolRoach, claimed to be able to tell whether milk had been poured into a cup before or after the tea. An experiment was conducted in which Muriel was presented with 8 cups of tea, and asked to guess whether the milk or tea was poured first. Our null hypothesis \(\left(H_{0}\right)\) is that Muriel has no ability to tell whether the milk was poured first. We would like to create a randomization distribution for \(\hat{p},\) the proportion of cups out of 8 that Muriel guesses correctly under \(H_{0}\). Describe a possible approach to generate randomization samples for each of the following scenarios: (a) Muriel does not know beforehand how many cups have milk poured first. (b) Muriel knows that 4 cups will have milk poured first and 4 will have tea poured first.

Do You Own a Smartphone? A study \(^{19}\) conducted in July 2015 examines smartphone ownership by US adults. A random sample of 2001 people were surveyed, and the study shows that 688 of the 989 men own a smartphone and 671 of the 1012 women own a smartphone. We want to test whether the survey results provide evidence of a difference in the proportion owning a smartphone between men and women. (a) State the null and alternative hypotheses, and define the parameters. (b) Give the notation and value of the sample statistic. In the sample, which group has higher smartphone ownership: men or women? (c) Use StatKey or other technology to find the pvalue.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free