Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Testing 100 right-handed participants on the reaction time of their left and right hands to determine if there is evidence for the claim that the right hand reacts faster than the left.

Short Answer

Expert verified
We conclude based on the t-test results and the associated p-value, either confirming or disproving the claim that the right hand reacts faster than the left for right-handed individuals.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Set Hypotheses

First set up the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis \(H_0\) would be that there is no difference in reaction time between right and left hand. The alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) is that the right hand reacts faster than the left hand.
02

Step 2. Gather and Organize Data

Next, arrange the collected reaction times of left and right hands from the test conducted on 100 right-handed participants. This could be organized in two columns: one for left hand times, and one for right hand times.
03

Step 3. Calculate the Mean Reaction Times

Calculate the mean reaction time for both, the left hand and the right hand. The mean is the total reaction time divided by the number of participants, in this case, 100.
04

Step 4. Conduct t-test

To compare the differences in means between two related groups, a paired-samples t-test is used. Perform the t-test on the means obtained in the previous step. This involves calculating the difference between the means, the standard deviation of differences and finally, the t-value.
05

Step 5. Decision Making

Decide on the null hypothesis based on the t-test results and a predetermined significance level (usually 5%). If the p-value obtained from the t-test is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. This would mean, there is enough evidence to suggest that the reaction times of the right hand are faster.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Euchre One of the authors and some statistician friends have an ongoing series of Euchre games that will stop when one of the two teams is deemed to be statistically significantly better than the other team. Euchre is a card game and each game results in a win for one team and a loss for the other. Only two teams are competing in this series, which we'll call team A and team B. (a) Define the parameter(s) of interest. (b) What are the null and alternative hypotheses if the goal is to determine if either team is statistically significantly better than the other at winning Euchre? (c) What sample statistic(s) would they need to measure as the games go on? (d) Could the winner be determined after one or two games? Why or why not? (e) Which significance level, \(5 \%\) or \(1 \%,\) will make the game last longer?

Exercise 4.19 on page 269 describes a study investigating the effects of exercise on cognitive function. \({ }^{31}\) Separate groups of mice were exposed to running wheels for \(0,2,4,7,\) or 10 days. Cognitive function was measured by \(Y\) maze performance. The study was testing whether exercise improves brain function, whether exercise reduces levels of BMP (a protein which makes the brain slower and less nimble), and whether exercise increases the levels of noggin (which improves the brain's ability). For each of the results quoted in parts (a), (b), and (c), interpret the information about the p-value in terms of evidence for the effect. (a) "Exercise improved Y-maze performance in most mice by the 7 th day of exposure, with further increases after 10 days for all mice tested \((p<.01)\) (b) "After only two days of running, BMP ... was reduced \(\ldots\) and it remained decreased for all subsequent time-points \((p<.01)\)." (c) "Levels of noggin ... did not change until 4 days, but had increased 1.5 -fold by \(7-10\) days of exercise \((p<.001)\)." (d) Which of the tests appears to show the strongest statistical effect? (e) What (if anything) can we conclude about the effects of exercise on mice?

By some accounts, the first formal hypothesis test to use statistics involved the claim of a lady tasting tea. \({ }^{11}\) In the 1920 's Muriel Bristol- Roach, a British biological scientist, was at a tea party where she claimed to be able to tell whether milk was poured into a cup before or after the tea. R.A. Fisher, an eminent statistician, was also attending the party. As a natural skeptic, Fisher assumed that Muriel had no ability to distinguish whether the milk or tea was poured first, and decided to test her claim. An experiment was designed in which Muriel would be presented with some cups of tea with the milk poured first, and some cups with the tea poured first. (a) In plain English (no symbols), describe the null and alternative hypotheses for this scenario. (b) Let \(p\) be the true proportion of times Muriel can guess correctly. State the null and alternative hypothesis in terms of \(p\).

Hypotheses for a statistical test are given, followed by several possible confidence intervals for different samples. In each case, use the confidence interval to state a conclusion of the test for that sample and give the significance level used. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: \rho=0\) vs \(H_{a}: \rho \neq 0\). In addition, in each case for which the results are significant, give the sign of the correlation. (a) \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\rho: 0.07\) to 0.15 . (b) \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\rho:-0.39\) to -0.78 . (c) \(99 \%\) confidence interval for \(\rho:-0.06\) to 0.03 .

Influencing Voters Exercise 4.39 on page 272 describes a possible study to see if there is evidence that a recorded phone call is more effective than a mailed flyer in getting voters to support a certain candidate. The study assumes a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05\) (a) What is the conclusion in the context of thisstudy if the p-value for the test is \(0.027 ?\) (b) In the conclusion in part (a), which type of error are we possibly making: Type I or Type II? Describe what that type of error means in this situation. (c) What is the conclusion if the p-value for the test is \(0.18 ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free