Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A situation is described for a statistical test. In each case, define the relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses. Testing to see if there is evidence that the mean time spent studying per week is different between first-year students and upperclass students.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Parameters are the mean time spent studying per week for first-year students (\( \mu_1 \)) and upperclass students (\( \mu_2 \)). The null hypothesis (H0) is \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0 \) and the alternative hypothesis (H1) is \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 \neq 0 \).

Step by step solution

01

Define Parameters

Let \( \mu_1 \) represent the mean study time per week for first-year students and \( \mu_2 \) the mean study time per week for upperclass students. These are the parameters this statistical test will be conducted upon.
02

Constructing Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis (H0) assumes that there is no difference between the two population means, so it's defined as: \( H0: \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0 \), which indicates that the mean study time of first-year students is the same as the upperclass students.
03

Constructing Alternative Hypothesis

The alternative hypothesis (H1) is the contrary to the null hypothesis. It states that there is a difference between the two population means. So, it's defined as: \( H1: \mu_1 - \mu_2 \neq 0 \), suggesting the mean study time for first-year students is not the same as for the upperclass students.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null and Alternative Hypotheses
Understanding the null and alternative hypotheses is critical in statistical hypothesis testing. The null hypothesis, denoted as H0, is a statement of no effect or no difference. It serves as a starting point and suggests that any observed variation is due to chance. For our exercise regarding study times, the null hypothesis posits that the average study time per week for first-year and upperclass students is exactly the same, mathematically expressed as H0: \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0 \).

In contrast, the alternative hypothesis, denoted as H1 or Ha, is a statement that indicates the presence of an effect or a significant difference. The alternative hypothesis for the exercise challenges the null, suggesting the study times differ between the two groups, formalized as H1: \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 eq 0 \). It's essentially what we aim to support or find evidence for during our testing.

Choosing the correct null and alternative hypotheses sets the stage for determining the appropriateness of the test and the interpretation of the results. They are mutually exclusive and together cover all possible scenarios.
Mean Comparison
Statistical tests often involve mean comparison, comparing the average values from two or more groups to draw conclusions. In the exercise, we're comparing the mean study times (\( \mu_1 \) and \( \mu_2 \) for the first-year and upperclass students, respectively) to see if any significant difference exists between them. The paired differences \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 \) is the focus of this exercise.

Mean comparison can be performed with various statistical tests such as t-tests, ANOVA, or Z-tests, depending on parameters like sample size, variance, and the underlying distribution of the data. Each test has its assumptions and conditions for applicability. This scenario seems to imply a two-sample t-test, used to compare two separate group means assuming data follows a roughly normal distribution when samples are small and variance is unknown.

Significance Level and Decision

While performing a mean comparison, we choose a significance level (usually 0.05) that determines how extreme the data must be for us to reject the null hypothesis. If the observed differences in means are deemed statistically significant, we may conclude that the study times are, in fact, different. Otherwise, we lack evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
Statistical Parameters
In the context of our statistical test, statistical parameters are numerical characteristics that define and describe aspects of a population. Parameters are the building blocks for our hypotheses. For instance, \( \mu_1 \) and \( \mu_2 \) in the exercise represent the population means for the first-year and upperclass student's study time respectively.

Identifying and defining the right parameters is crucial; they summarize key features of a population, such as location (mean), spread (variance, standard deviation), and shape (skewness, kurtosis). These numbers provide a standardized way to describe and make inferences about populations based on sample data.

Parameter Estimation

Since we often cannot measure every individual in a population, we use sample data to estimate these parameters. Such estimations come with a degree of uncertainty, measured and communicated through confidence intervals and standard errors. Understanding statistical parameters is fundamental in hypothesis testing as they form the basis upon which we compare, infer, and draw conclusions about wider populations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Polling 1000 people in a large community to determine the average number of hours a day people watch television.

In Exercise 3.129 on page \(254,\) we see that the home team was victorious in 70 games out of a sample of 120 games in the FA premier league, a football (soccer) league in Great Britain. We wish to investigate the proportion \(p\) of all games won by the home team in this league. (a) Use StatKeyor other technology to find and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of games won by the home team. (b) State the null and alternative hypotheses for a test to see if there is evidence that the proportion is different from 0.5 . (c) Use the confidence interval from part (a) to make a conclusion in the test from part (b). State the confidence level used. (d) Use StatKey or other technology to create a randomization distribution and find the p-value for the test in part (b). (e) Clearly interpret the result of the test using the p-value and using a \(10 \%\) significance level. Does your answer match your answer from part (c)? (f) What information does the confidence interval give that the p-value doesn't? What information does the p-value give that the confidence interval doesn't? (g) What's the main difference between the bootstrap distribution of part (a) and the randomization distribution of part (d)?

The consumption of caffeine to benefit alertness is a common activity practiced by \(90 \%\) of adults in North America. Often caffeine is used in order to replace the need for sleep. One study \(^{24}\) compares students' ability to recall memorized information after either the consumption of caffeine or a brief sleep. A random sample of 35 adults (between the ages of 18 and 39 ) were randomly divided into three groups and verbally given a list of 24 words to memorize. During a break, one of the groups takes a nap for an hour and a half, another group is kept awake and then given a caffeine pill an hour prior to testing, and the third group is given a placebo. The response variable of interest is the number of words participants are able to recall following the break. The summary statistics for the three groups are in Table 4.9. We are interested in testing whether there is evidence of a difference in average recall ability between any two of the treatments. Thus we have three possible tests between different pairs of groups: Sleep vs Caffeine, Sleep vs Placebo, and Caffeine vs Placebo. (a) In the test comparing the sleep group to the caffeine group, the p-value is \(0.003 .\) What is the conclusion of the test? In the sample, which group had better recall ability? According to the test results, do you think sleep is really better than caffeine for recall ability? (b) In the test comparing the sleep group to the placebo group, the p-value is 0.06 . What is the conclusion of the test using a \(5 \%\) significance level? If we use a \(10 \%\) significance level? How strong is the evidence of a difference in mean recall ability between these two treatments? (c) In the test comparing the caffeine group to the placebo group, the p-value is 0.22 . What is the conclusion of the test? In the sample, which group had better recall ability? According to the test results, would we be justified in concluding that caffeine impairs recall ability? (d) According to this study, what should you do before an exam that asks you to recall information?

Exercise 4.19 on page 269 describes a study investigating the effects of exercise on cognitive function. \({ }^{31}\) Separate groups of mice were exposed to running wheels for \(0,2,4,7,\) or 10 days. Cognitive function was measured by \(Y\) maze performance. The study was testing whether exercise improves brain function, whether exercise reduces levels of BMP (a protein which makes the brain slower and less nimble), and whether exercise increases the levels of noggin (which improves the brain's ability). For each of the results quoted in parts (a), (b), and (c), interpret the information about the p-value in terms of evidence for the effect. (a) "Exercise improved Y-maze performance in most mice by the 7 th day of exposure, with further increases after 10 days for all mice tested \((p<.01)\) (b) "After only two days of running, BMP ... was reduced \(\ldots\) and it remained decreased for all subsequent time-points \((p<.01)\)." (c) "Levels of noggin ... did not change until 4 days, but had increased 1.5 -fold by \(7-10\) days of exercise \((p<.001)\)." (d) Which of the tests appears to show the strongest statistical effect? (e) What (if anything) can we conclude about the effects of exercise on mice?

Suppose you want to find out if reading speed is any different between a print book and an e-book. (a) Clearly describe how you might set up an experiment to test this. Give details. (b) Why is a hypothesis test valuable here? What additional information does a hypothesis test give us beyond the descriptive statistics we discuss in Chapter \(2 ?\) (c) Why is a confidence interval valuable here? What additional information does a confidence interval give us beyond the descriptive statistics of Chapter 2 and the results of a hypothesis test described in part (b)? (d) A similar study \(^{53}\) has been conducted, and reports that "the difference between Kindle and the book was significant at the \(p<.01\) level, and the difference between the iPad and the book was marginally significant at \(p=.06 . "\) The report also stated that "the iPad measured at \(6.2 \%\) slower reading speed than the printed book, whereas the Kindle measured at \(10.7 \%\) slower than print. However, the difference between the two devices [iPad and Kindle] was not statistically significant because of the data's fairly high variability." Can you tell from the first quotation which method of reading (print or e-book) was faster in the sample or do you need the second quotation for that? Explain the results in your own words.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free