Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The same sample statistic is used to test a hypothesis, using different sample sizes. In each case, use StatKey or other technology to find the p-value and indicate whether the results are significant at a \(5 \%\) level. Which sample size provides the strongest evidence for the alternative hypothesis? Testing \(H_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: p_{1}>p_{2}\) using \(\hat{p}_{1}-\hat{p}_{2}=0.45-0.30=0.15\) with each of the following sample sizes: (a) \(\hat{p}_{1}=9 / 20=0.45\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=6 / 20=0.30\) (b) \(\hat{p}_{1}=90 / 200=0.45\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=60 / 200=0.30\) (c) \(\hat{p}_{1}=900 / 2000=0.45\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=600 / 2000=0.30\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Without the specific calculated p-values, it is not possible to conclude which sample size provides the strongest evidence for the alternative hypothesis. Generally, with all other factors being equal, a larger sample size would provide stronger evidence for the alternative hypothesis as it minimizes the standard error. However, the comparison of the p-values from all the different sizes will give the correct answer. Use a tool like StatKey, Python, or R to compute the p-values.

Step by step solution

01

Testing Hypothesis for Sample Size (a)

In the first scenario, we have \(\hat{p}_{1}=0.45\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=0.30\). In this case, the difference for the sample proportion is \(\hat{p}_{1} - \hat{p}_{2}=0.15\). To calculate the p-value, it's recommended to use a technology like StatKey, Python, R, or any kind of statistical software. A p-value less than 0.05 will mean that the result is significant at the 5% level.
02

Testing Hypothesis for Sample Size (b)

In the second scenario, the sample size is larger with \(\hat{p}_{1}=0.45\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=0.30\), but the difference \(\hat{p}_{1} - \hat{p}_{2}\) is still 0.15. After calculating the p-value with a statistical tool, like StatKey, if the p-value is less than 0.05, it means that the result is significant at the 5% level.
03

Testing Hypothesis for Sample Size (c)

In the third scenario, the sample size is now 2,000 with \(\hat{p}_{1}=0.45\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=0.30\), and the difference \(\hat{p}_{1} - \hat{p}_{2}\) remains 0.15. Again, a statistical tool is used to calculate the p-value. If this p-value is less than 0.05, it's significant at the 5% level.
04

Comparing the Results

After calculating the p-value for each scenario, the sample size that gives the lowest p-value will provide the strongest evidence for the alternative hypothesis because a smaller p-value means there is stronger evidence against the null hypothesis. You need to compare the p-values of all three tests to find the smallest.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

P-value Significance
The p-value is a crucial concept in hypothesis testing that represents the probability of obtaining a sample statistic at least as extreme as the one observed, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. In simpler terms, it measures how surprising your data is, given the null hypothesis.

When conducting a hypothesis test, researchers typically set a significance level, often 5%, denoted as \(\alpha = 0.05\), before collecting data. This level represents the threshold for deciding whether an observed effect is statistically significant. If a p-value is smaller than the chosen significance level, the result is deemed significant, which suggests the observed data are unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone, and thus, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

In the exercise above, different sample sizes are used to test the hypothesis. For each, a p-value is calculated using statistical software. If any of the p-values are below 0.05, those results would be considered significant at the 5% level, indicating that there's sufficient evidence to suggest that \(p_1 > p_2\), supporting the alternative hypothesis.
Statistical Software Usage
Statistical software plays an integral role in modern statistical analysis, allowing researchers to manage, analyze, and visualize data more efficiently and accurately. Software such as StatKey, R, and Python have vast libraries and functions designed specifically for performing statistical tests, including hypothesis testing.

Using these tools, researchers can quickly calculate complex statistics, such as p-values, without the need for tedious manual calculations. In the context of the provided exercise, utilizing statistical software simplifies the process of determining whether the sample statistic gives significant evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. This accessibility is vital when dealing with large sample sizes or when precision is paramount for reliable results. By inputting sample proportions and sample sizes into the software, students and professionals alike can effortlessly compute p-values and draw conclusions about their hypotheses.
Sample Size Impact
Sample size is a fundamental factor in statistical tests that directly impacts the reliability of the results. A larger sample size tends to yield more accurate estimates of population parameters and can increase the power of a hypothesis test, which is the probability of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false. In other words, larger samples reduce the chances of a Type II error, where one fails to detect a real effect or difference.

In the exercise, the impact of sample size is highlighted by comparing three different sample sizes, while keeping the observed differences the same. A larger sample size will typically result in a smaller standard error of the sample statistic, leading to a smaller p-value when testing the same null hypothesis. Therefore, the larger the sample size, the higher the likelihood of detecting the effect size of \(0.15\), assuming such an effect truly exists. It is essential for students to understand that increasing the sample size can be a critical means of providing more convincing evidence for the alternative hypothesis in hypothesis testing.
Null and Alternative Hypothesis
In the realm of hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis \(H_0\) represents a statement of no effect or no difference, and is the hypothesis that one seeks evidence against. On the flip side, the alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) represents the statement for which one is seeking evidence.

In the current exercise, \(H_0: p_1 = p_2\) implies that there is no difference between the two population proportions. Conversely, the alternative hypothesis \(H_a: p_1 > p_2\) suggests that the first population proportion is greater than the second. Hypothesis tests are designed to assess the strength of the evidence against \(H_0\). If evidence is strong enough, as indicated by a low p-value, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative. It is crucial to define these hypotheses clearly before conducting the test, as they guide the entire analysis and the interpretation of the results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose you want to find out if reading speed is any different between a print book and an e-book. (a) Clearly describe how you might set up an experiment to test this. Give details. (b) Why is a hypothesis test valuable here? What additional information does a hypothesis test give us beyond the descriptive statistics we discuss in Chapter \(2 ?\) (c) Why is a confidence interval valuable here? What additional information does a confidence interval give us beyond the descriptive statistics of Chapter 2 and the results of a hypothesis test described in part (b)? (d) A similar study \(^{53}\) has been conducted, and reports that "the difference between Kindle and the book was significant at the \(p<.01\) level, and the difference between the iPad and the book was marginally significant at \(p=.06 . "\) The report also stated that "the iPad measured at \(6.2 \%\) slower reading speed than the printed book, whereas the Kindle measured at \(10.7 \%\) slower than print. However, the difference between the two devices [iPad and Kindle] was not statistically significant because of the data's fairly high variability." Can you tell from the first quotation which method of reading (print or e-book) was faster in the sample or do you need the second quotation for that? Explain the results in your own words.

Hypotheses for a statistical test are given, followed by several possible confidence intervals for different samples. In each case, use the confidence interval to state a conclusion of the test for that sample and give the significance level used. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: \rho=0\) vs \(H_{a}: \rho \neq 0\). In addition, in each case for which the results are significant, give the sign of the correlation. (a) \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\rho: 0.07\) to 0.15 . (b) \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\rho:-0.39\) to -0.78 . (c) \(99 \%\) confidence interval for \(\rho:-0.06\) to 0.03 .

Flaxseed and Omega-3 Exercise 4.30 on page 271 describes a company that advertises that its milled flaxseed contains, on average, at least \(3800 \mathrm{mg}\) of ALNA, the primary omega-3 fatty acid in flaxseed, per tablespoon. In each case below, which of the standard significance levels, \(1 \%\) or \(5 \%\) or \(10 \%,\) makes the most sense for that situation? (a) The company plans to conduct a test just to double-check that its claim is correct. The company is eager to find evidence that the average amount per tablespoon is greater than 3800 (their alternative hypothesis), and is not really worried about making a mistake. The test is internal to the company and there are unlikely to be any real consequences either way. (b) Suppose, instead, that a consumer organization plans to conduct a test to see if there is evidence against the claim that the product contains at least \(3800 \mathrm{mg}\) per tablespoon. If the organization finds evidence that the advertising claim is false, it will file a lawsuit against the flaxseed company. The organization wants to be very sure that the evidence is strong, since if the company is sued incorrectly, there could be very serious consequences.

For each situation described, indicate whether it makes more sense to use a relatively large significance level (such as \(\alpha=0.10\) ) or a relatively small significance level (such as \(\alpha=0.01\) ). Testing a new drug with potentially dangerous side effects to see if it is significantly better than the drug currently in use. If it is found to be more effective, it will be prescribed to millions of people.

In Exercise 4.16 on page 268 , we describe an observational study investigating a possible relationship between exposure to organophosphate pesticides as measured in urinary metabolites (DAP) and diagnosis of ADHD (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder). In reporting the results of this study, the authors \(^{28}\) make the following statements: \- "The threshold for statistical significance was set at \(P<.05 . "\) \- "The odds of meeting the \(\ldots\) criteria for \(\mathrm{ADHD}\) increased with the urinary concentrations of total DAP metabolites" \- "The association was statistically significant." (a) What can we conclude about the p-value obtained in analyzing the data? (b) Based on these statements, can we distinguish whether the evidence of association is very strong vs moderately strong? Why or why not? (c) Can we conclude that exposure to pesticides is related to the likelihood of an ADHD diagnosis? (d) Can we conclude that exposure to pesticides causes more cases of ADHD? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free